Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HPCC-30405 CNoopSpan Implementation #17893

Closed

Conversation

rpastrana
Copy link
Member

  • Defines CNoopSpan
  • Adds cppunit skip directives
  • TraceManager produces CNoop if disabled
  • HPCC GlobalID,CallerID not persisted

Type of change:

  • This change is a bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • This change is a new feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • This change improves the code (refactor or other change that does not change the functionality)
  • This change fixes warnings (the fix does not alter the functionality or the generated code)
  • This change is a breaking change (fix or feature that will cause existing behavior to change).
  • This change alters the query API (existing queries will have to be recompiled)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
    • My code does not create any new warnings from compiler, build system, or lint.
  • The commit message is properly formatted and free of typos.
    • The commit message title makes sense in a changelog, by itself.
    • The commit is signed.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly, or...
    • I have created a JIRA ticket to update the documentation.
    • Any new interfaces or exported functions are appropriately commented.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTORS document.
  • The change has been fully tested:
    • I have added tests to cover my changes.
    • All new and existing tests passed.
    • I have checked that this change does not introduce memory leaks.
    • I have used Valgrind or similar tools to check for potential issues.
  • I have given due consideration to all of the following potential concerns:
    • Scalability
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Thread-safety
    • Cloud-compatibility
    • Premature optimization
    • Existing deployed queries will not be broken
    • This change fixes the problem, not just the symptom
    • The target branch of this pull request is appropriate for such a change.
  • There are no similar instances of the same problem that should be addressed
    • I have addressed them here
    • I have raised JIRA issues to address them separately
  • This is a user interface / front-end modification
    • I have tested my changes in multiple modern browsers
    • The component(s) render as expected

Smoketest:

  • Send notifications about my Pull Request position in Smoketest queue.
  • Test my draft Pull Request.

Testing:

- Defines CNoopSpan
- Adds cppunit skip directives
- TraceManager produces CNoop if disabled
- HPCC GlobalID,CallerID not persisted

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Pastrana <[email protected]>
@github-actions
Copy link

@rpastrana
Copy link
Member Author

@ghalliday WIP, I assume we want CNoopSpan to persist HPCC's GlobalID, etc. but the write up seemed to indicate the opposite, let me know.

- factors CNoopSpan
- Adds cppunit skip directives
- Adds passthrough cppunit
- Ensures passthrough valus logged

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Pastrana <[email protected]>
@rpastrana rpastrana requested a review from ghalliday October 12, 2023 21:02
Copy link
Member

@ghalliday ghalliday left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rpastrana I think you have implemented something different from the jira. The first commit was close, but was not used in the way I was expecting/described in the jira.
The second commit seems to be implementing HPCC-30432, but in a way that duplicates code rather than the way that was suggested.

@rpastrana
Copy link
Member Author

@rpastrana I think you have implemented something different from the jira. The first commit was close, but was not used in the way I was expecting/described in the jira. The second commit seems to be implementing HPCC-30432, but in a way that duplicates code rather than the way that was suggested.

Ok, that's deflating to hear given the amount of thought and time to test I devoted to this. I will focus entirely on the description of HPCC-30405. A couple of questions for you, 1) will this Cnoopspan ever support "passthrough" attributes? 2) is Cnullspan/Cnoopspan really just a CnoOteltracingSpan or CPassThroughSpan, etc? 3) Can you expand on this: "and avoid the need to check for activeSink in the context code (and elsewhere)."

@rpastrana rpastrana closed this Oct 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants