-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 329
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow broadcasting a renderable later #501
Open
davidalejandroaguilar
wants to merge
1
commit into
hotwired:main
Choose a base branch
from
davidalejandroaguilar:allow-broadcasting-renderable-later
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the property re-assignment necessary? The
action_view
code that checks forrespond_to?(:render_in)
seems to expect the object under the:renderable
key.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I see. View Components aren't serializable to Active Job arguments:
This means that if we stick with the current proposed change, rendering of the
renderable:
option would occur immediately, in-process with the request, and the broadcast would be enqueued to a background job.Prior to this change, the rendering itself occurs in the background job alongside the broadcasting. This change would mean that
rendering:
options are a special case, require special care, and could have adverse effects on the request-response cycle if the rendering is expensive.I'm curious what it'd take to make ViewComponent
ActiveJob
-serializable.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is.
Since we're rendering the renderable in advance, if we don't re-assign, the
:renderable
key will have aActiveSupport::SafeBuffer
value, andTurbo::Streams::Broadcasts#broadcast_action_to
will callrender_format(:html, **rendering)
causing it to fail with:Because it's not actually a renderable that responds to
format
, but rendered HTML.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I was going to mention exactly that:
That what will happen in the background is the actual broadcasting, but the rendering will still be synchronous. Unless we somehow serialize the component in a way that is compatible with
ActiveJob
/Sidekiq
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, not exactly true, prior to this change, these
_later
methods using a renderable are entirely broken 😄