Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add bidir esd/tvs diode #321

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

LHSmicius
Copy link
Contributor

@LHSmicius LHSmicius commented Jun 12, 2023

As always I have some questions :D
Unit
I names pins "1" and "2", because it's bidirectional - it would be not accurate to call pins "A" and "K".
Symbol
I marked pin 1 with "+" because even if it's bidirectional (from electrical view), ESD and TVS diodes often has not symmetric package. Maybe pad numbers are enough... IDK...
image
Package
Just noticed that there is not described in "Horizon Pool Convention" that Courtyard expansion should be 0.25mm. It would be nice to mention somewhere.
image
Part
Base part has no description (It doesn't make any sense), so bot will fail. I think we need exception for base parts.

@LHSmicius
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bot!

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@LHSmicius
Copy link
Contributor Author

LHSmicius commented Jun 14, 2023

Bot!
Finally text placement is correct. Bot fails on base part which is good.

@LHSmicius
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bot!

@github-actions
Copy link

This review is brought to you by the Horizon EDA Poolbot commit 33131f8.

Items in this PR

State Type Name Checks Version Filename
New Entity ESD diode bidirectional ✔️ Pass 0 ✔️ entities/diode/esd_diode_bidirectional.json
New Package SOD523 ✔️ Pass 0 ✔️ packages/diode/SOD523/package.json
New Part base SOD523 ESD diode bidirectional ❌ Fail 1 ✔️ parts/diode/base_SOD523_ESD_bidirectional.json
New Part DESD5V0U1BB ✔️ Pass 0 ✔️ parts/diode/tvs/DESD5V0U1BB.json
New Symbol ESD diode bidirectional ✔️ Pass 1 ✔️ symbols/diode/esd_diode_bidirectional.json
New Unit ESD diode bidirectional ✔️ Pass 0 ✔️ units/diode/esd_diode_bidirectional.json

Parts overview (excluding derived)

Bold items are from this PR

  • Part base SOD523 ESD diode bidirectional
    • Package SOD523
      • Padstack SMD rectangular
    • Entity ESD diode bidirectional
      • Unit ESD diode bidirectional
        • Symbol ESD diode bidirectional

Derived parts

Bold items are from this PR

  • base SOD523 ESD diode bidirectional
    • DESD5V0U1BB

Parts table

Values in italic are inherited

MPN Value Manufacturer Datasheet Description Tags
base SOD523 ESD diode bidirectional bidirectional diode esd smd tvs
DESD5V0U1BB Diodes Inc. https://www.diodes.com/assets/Datasheets/DESD5V0U1BB.pdf Bidirectional TVS diode, 2.9pF bidirectional diode esd smd tvs

Details

Parts

base SOD523 ESD diode bidirectional

Checks didn't pass

  • ❌ Description must not be empty
Attribute Value
MPN base SOD523 ESD diode bidirectional
Value
Manufacturer (125 other parts)
Datasheet
Description
Tags bidirectional diode esd smd tvs

Flags

  • Base part
Pad Gate Pin
1 Main 1
2 Main 2

DESD5V0U1BB

Inerhits from base SOD523 ESD diode bidirectional

✔️ Checks passed

Attribute Value
MPN DESD5V0U1BB
Value
Manufacturer Diodes Inc. (39 other parts)
Datasheet https://www.diodes.com/assets/Datasheets/DESD5V0U1BB.pdf
Description Bidirectional TVS diode, 2.9pF
Tags bidirectional diode esd smd tvs (inherited)

Orderable MPNs

  • DESD5V0U1BB-7

Entities

ESD diode bidirectional

✔️ Checks passed

Attribute Value
Manufacturer (125 other parts)
Prefix D
Tags bidirectional diode esd tvs
Gate Suffix Swap group Unit
Main 0 ESD diode bidirectional

Units

ESD diode bidirectional

✔️ Checks passed

Attribute Value
Manufacturer (125 other parts)
Pin Direction
1 Passive
2 Passive

Symbol: ESD diode bidirectional

✔️ Checks passed

Angle Normal Mirrored
Symbol Symbol
90° Symbol Symbol
180° Symbol Symbol
270° Symbol Symbol

Packages

SOD523

Attribute Value
Manufacturer (125 other parts)
Tags diode generic smd

✔️ Package checks passed

✔️ Clearance checks passed

Package

Parameters
Parameter Value
Courtyard expansion 000.250 mm
2.000mm 0.800mm
get-parameter [ courtyard_expansion ]
2 * +xy
set-polygon [ courtyard rectangle 0.000mm 0.000mm ]
Pads
Pad Padstack Pad width Pad height
1 SMD rectangular 000.600 mm 000.700 mm
2 SMD rectangular 000.600 mm 000.700 mm
3D views (no models)

Without model

Top Bottom
3D 3D
Pitch analysis
X Y Count
001.400 mm 000.000 mm 2

@RX14
Copy link
Collaborator

RX14 commented Aug 12, 2023

If in doubt, look at what other parts do! The other diodes in the pool all use A/K pin naming.

In regards to the + pin marking, I am sceptical but I haven't used any of these diodes so I trust you to choose a sensible course. Other passives don't tend to enable pin markings on their symbols.

I would consider rounding the pads of the SOD package.

@LHSmicius
Copy link
Contributor Author

Changed pin names to A/K - you are right, even it's bidirectional, it makes more sense then naming 1/2.
Decided not to use "+" marking because it's non-standard and maybe it will bring more uncertainty.
Now I also think about round pads, it's easy to do, but then it will differs from other packages in the pool. I can make other PR and change all SOD packages to use round pads if needed

@RX14
Copy link
Collaborator

RX14 commented Aug 12, 2023

Newer parts to the pool all have round pads. Square or round pads is purely about the age of the part in the pool, nothing else. One day perhaps all the parts will have round pads

@LHSmicius
Copy link
Contributor Author

Didn't find how to calculate corner radius, so for now used default 0.1 mm. If it's not correct, I will fix it.

@LHSmicius
Copy link
Contributor Author

In last 2 commits I completely redraw footprint using horizon built-in footprint generator for SOD package. It looks a bit different from Diodes Inc suggestion. That's how footprint generator draws using package dimensions (attached datasheet screenshot upper side) as input parameters.
image
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bot: fail At least one check failed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants