Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
updated the release notes
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
hneemann committed Feb 1, 2020
1 parent 7b92e1d commit c71298d
Showing 1 changed file with 7 additions and 7 deletions.
14 changes: 7 additions & 7 deletions distribution/ReleaseNotes.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,23 +1,23 @@
Release Notes

HEAD, planned as v0.24
- Added support for INOUT ports in HDL generation.
v0.24, released on 1. Feb. 2020
- Improved SVG export
- Allows to disable inputs and outputs in the measurement graph.
- Model analyzer is able to use switches as inputs.
- Editor is able to store views ([CRTL]+[[n]] to store and [[n]] ro recall a view.
So [CTRL]+[1] stores a view in slot one and [1] recalls it.
- Editor is able to store views ([CRTL]+[[n]] to create, [[n]] ro recall
a view. So [CTRL]+[1] stores a view in slot one and [1] recalls it.
- The octal number format was added.
- A mirroring option was added to some components.
- Custom Java implemented components can now also implement HDL code to represent
the component in an HDL export.
- Custom Java implemented components can now also implement HDL code to
represent the component in an HDL export.
- Added a undo function to the table editor.
- Adds a command line interface for testing circuits.
- Allows to disable "snap to grid" in text and rectangle components.
- A push button combined with a LED was added.
- A VGA monitor was added.
- Unnamed Tunnels are ignored silently.
- Improved naming of new Tunnels. Unnamed Tunnels are ignored silently.
- Overlapping pins are now connected.
- Added support for INOUT ports in HDL generation.
- Fixed an issue with Chinese text rendering.

v0.23, released on 23. Aug. 2019
Expand Down

2 comments on commit c71298d

@mengstr
Copy link

@mengstr mengstr commented on c71298d Feb 1, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh? The bookmarks/views are still here? I thought you had to remove them when taking care of #384

@hneemann
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope! It was not necessary to remove the views to fix #384.

Please sign in to comment.