Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typos in Beyond Binary Classification #315

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 2 additions & 4 deletions book/complex.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13,8 +13,6 @@ \chapter{Beyond Binary Classification} \label{sec:complex}
regression.
\end{learningobjectives}

\dependencies{}

\newthought{In the preceeding chapters,} you have learned all about a
very simple form of prediction: predicting bits. In the real world,
however, we often need to predict much more complex objects. You may
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -70,9 +68,9 @@ \section{Learning with Imbalanced Data} \label{sec:imbalanced}
that you are left with a balanced data set ($50\%$ positive, $50\%$
negative). This might scare you a bit since throwing out data seems
like a bad idea, but at least it makes learning much more efficient.
In weighting, instead of throwing out positive examples, we just give
In weighting, instead of throwing out negative examples, we just give
them lower weight. If you assign an \concept{importance weight} of
$0.00101$ to each of the positive examples, then there will be as much
$0.00101$ to each of the negative examples, then there will be as much
\emph{weight} associated with positive examples as negative examples.

Before formally defining these heuristics, we need to have a mechanism
Expand Down