Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update grammar #276

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions book/ens.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ \section{Boosting Weak Learners}
$\vx$; otherwise $f(\vx) = -1$ for all $\vx$. To make the problem
moderately interesting, suppose that in the original training set,
there are $80$ positive examples and $20$ negative examples. In this
case, $f\oth(\vx)=+1$. It's weighted error rate will be $\hat\ep\oth
case, $f\oth(\vx)=+1$. Its weighted error rate will be $\hat\ep\oth
= 0.2$ because it gets every negative example wrong. Computing, we
get $\al\oth = \frac12\log 4$. Before normalization, we get the new
weight for each positive (correct) example to be $1 \exp[-\frac12\log
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ \section{Boosting Weak Learners}

In fact, a very popular weak learner is a decision \concept{decision
stump}: a decision tree that can only ask \emph{one} question. This
may seem like a silly model (and, in fact, it is on it's own), but
may seem like a silly model (and, in fact, it is on its own), but
when combined with boosting, it becomes very effective. To understand
why, suppose for a moment that our data consists only of binary
features, so that any question that a decision tree might ask is of
Expand Down