Enhance Request Handling in Request.php +semver: minor #227
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
penify-dev
bot
changed the title
PR Review 🔍
|
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
Code Coverage Report
|
guibranco
changed the title
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settings Change summary preferencesCodacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more |
PR Code Suggestions ✨
|
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; | ||
| if ($data !== null) { | ||
| $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; | ||
| } |
Check warning
Code scanning / Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
No blank line found after control structure Warning
| $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; | ||
| if ($data !== null) { | ||
| $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; | ||
| } |
Check warning
Code scanning / Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
No blank line found after control structure Warning
| $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; | ||
| if ($data !== null) { | ||
| $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; | ||
| } |
Check warning
Code scanning / Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
No blank line found after control structure Warning
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/Request.php (3)
101-103: LGTM: Improved handling of null data in POST requestsThe conditional check for null data before setting CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS is a good practice. It prevents unnecessary assignments and potential issues with null data.
Consider adding a blank line after the
ifblock to improve readability:if ($data !== null) { $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; } + return $this->execute($fields);🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 103-103:
No blank line found after control structure
111-113: LGTM: Improved handling of null data in PUT requestsThe conditional check for null data before setting CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS is consistent with the change in the
postmethod and is a good practice.Consider adding a blank line after the
ifblock to improve readability:if ($data !== null) { $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; } + return $this->execute($fields);🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 113-113:
No blank line found after control structure
131-133: LGTM: Improved handling of null data in PATCH requestsThe conditional check for null data before setting CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS is consistent with the changes in other methods and is a good practice.
Consider adding a blank line after the
ifblock to improve readability:if ($data !== null) { $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; } + return $this->execute($fields);🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 133-133:
No blank line found after control structure
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/Request.php (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
src/Request.php
[warning] 103-103:
No blank line found after control structure
[warning] 113-113:
No blank line found after control structure
[warning] 133-133:
No blank line found after control structure
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/Request.php (3)
50-50: LGTM: Improved response object with request headersAdding the request headers to the result object is a good practice. It enhances debugging capabilities and provides more context for the request-response cycle.
121-123: LGTM: Improved handling of optional data in DELETE requestsThe conditional check for null data before setting CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS is consistent with the changes in other methods. This change allows for sending data with DELETE requests when necessary, while maintaining backwards compatibility.
Line range hint
1-153: Overall assessment: Approved with minor formatting suggestionsThe changes in this pull request improve the
Requestclass by:
- Adding request headers to the result object, enhancing debugging capabilities.
- Implementing consistent null checks for request data across all HTTP methods (POST, PUT, DELETE, PATCH).
These improvements align with best practices for HTTP request handling and do not introduce breaking changes. The code is more robust and maintainable as a result of these changes.
To further improve code consistency, consider adding blank lines after the
ifblocks in the POST, PUT, and PATCH methods as suggested in the individual comments.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 103-103:
No blank line found after control structure
[warning] 113-113:
No blank line found after control structure
| $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; | ||
| if ($data !== null) { | ||
| $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; | ||
| } |
Check warning
Code scanning / Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
No blank line found after control structure Warning
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
docs/changelog.md (1)
3-5: Approve changelog entry with a suggestion for improvementThe new changelog entry for version 0.11 is well-formatted and clearly describes the enhancement to the Request class. However, there's an opportunity for improvement:
- The PR description mentions that this change introduces a breaking change, but this is not reflected in the changelog entry.
Consider modifying the changelog entry to explicitly mention the breaking change. For example:
- Enhance the Request class with optional data parameter by [@guibranco](https://github.com/guibranco). + Enhance the Request class with optional data parameter (breaking change) by [@guibranco](https://github.com/guibranco).This will help users understand the potential impact of upgrading to this version.
src/Request.php (4)
102-102: Add a blank line after the control structure.To improve code readability and adhere to common PHP coding standards, add a blank line after the closing brace of the
ifstatement.Here's the suggested change:
if ($data !== null) { $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; } + return $this->execute($fields);🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 102-102:
No blank line found after control structure
112-112: Add a blank line after the control structure.To improve code readability and adhere to common PHP coding standards, add a blank line after the closing brace of the
ifstatement.Here's the suggested change:
if ($data !== null) { $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; } + return $this->execute($fields);🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 112-112:
No blank line found after control structure
132-132: Add a blank line after the control structure.To improve code readability and adhere to common PHP coding standards, add a blank line after the closing brace of the
ifstatement.Here's the suggested change:
if ($data !== null) { $fields[CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS] = $data; } + return $this->execute($fields);🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 132-132:
No blank line found after control structure
Line range hint
100-132: Consistent improvements with potential breaking changesThe changes made to the
post,put,delete, andpatchmethods are consistent and improve the robustness of the code by only settingCURLOPT_POSTFIELDSwhen$datais not null. This is a good practice that prevents potential issues with null data.However, it's important to note that these changes could be considered breaking changes if any existing code relied on
CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSalways being set, even with null data. The PR description does mention a breaking change, which aligns with these modifications.To ensure backward compatibility:
- Update the documentation to clearly state this change in behavior.
- Consider adding a major version bump to the library version number.
- If possible, add a deprecation notice in the previous version to warn users about the upcoming change.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 102-102:
No blank line found after control structure
[warning] 112-112:
No blank line found after control structure
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- docs/changelog.md (1 hunks)
- src/Request.php (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
src/Request.php
[warning] 102-102:
No blank line found after control structure
[warning] 112-112:
No blank line found after control structure
[warning] 132-132:
No blank line found after control structure
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/Request.php (4)
110-112: Approve the conditional check for$data.The addition of the conditional check
if ($data !== null)before settingCURLOPT_POSTFIELDSis a good improvement, consistent with the change in thepostmethod. It ensures that the PUT fields are only set when data is actually provided.As with the
postmethod, note that this change might be considered a breaking change if any existing code relied onCURLOPT_POSTFIELDSalways being set, even with null data.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 112-112:
No blank line found after control structure
120-122: Approve the conditional check for$data.The addition of the conditional check
if ($data !== null)before settingCURLOPT_POSTFIELDSis a good improvement, consistent with the changes in thepostandputmethods. It ensures that the DELETE fields are only set when data is actually provided.As with the other methods, note that this change might be considered a breaking change if any existing code relied on
CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSalways being set, even with null data.The indentation and spacing in this method are correct, which is good for code readability.
130-132: Approve the conditional check for$data.The addition of the conditional check
if ($data !== null)before settingCURLOPT_POSTFIELDSis a good improvement, consistent with the changes in the other methods. It ensures that the PATCH fields are only set when data is actually provided.As with the other methods, note that this change might be considered a breaking change if any existing code relied on
CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSalways being set, even with null data.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 132-132:
No blank line found after control structure
100-102: Approve the conditional check for$data.The addition of the conditional check
if ($data !== null)before settingCURLOPT_POSTFIELDSis a good improvement. It ensures that the POST fields are only set when data is actually provided, which is more efficient and prevents potential issues with null data.However, please note that this change might be considered a breaking change if any existing code relied on
CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSalways being set, even with null data.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the codebase, please run the following verification script:
✅ Verification successful
CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSUsage Verified Successfully.The search for
CURLOPT_POSTFIELDSreturned only instances withinsrc/Request.php. This confirms that the added conditional check does not impact other parts of the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any direct usage of CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS in the codebase # that might be affected by this change. rg --type php 'CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS'Length of output: 294
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Phpcs (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 102-102:
No blank line found after control structure
|
Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked! 💻 Scan logs6:17PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
6:17PM INF 160 commits scanned.
6:17PM INF scan completed in 423ms
6:17PM INF no leaks found
|
|
User description
Closes #
📑 Description
✅ Checks
☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?
ℹ Additional Information
Description
requestHeadersin the response object for better debugging.$datais checked for null before use.Changes walkthrough 📝
Request.php
Enhance Request Handling in Request.phpsrc/Request.php
requestHeadersto the result of theexecutemethod.post,put,delete, andpatchmethods to check if$datais notnull before assigning it to
CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation