Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GitAuto: [FEATURE] Implement Database wrapper #205

Closed

Conversation

gitauto-ai[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@gitauto-ai gitauto-ai bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Original issue: #83

What is the feature

The feature is to implement a Database wrapper that abstracts the underlying database operations, providing a simplified and consistent interface for interacting with the database.

Why we need the feature

A Database wrapper is essential for maintaining clean and maintainable code. It allows developers to interact with the database without needing to know the specifics of the database implementation. This abstraction layer can help in reducing code duplication, improving testability, and making it easier to switch database engines if needed.

How to implement and why

  1. Define the Interface:

    • Create an interface that outlines the basic operations needed (e.g., connect, disconnect, executeQuery, fetchResults).
    • This ensures that any database implementation adheres to a consistent contract.
  2. Implement the Wrapper Class:

    • Develop a class that implements the defined interface.
    • Use a popular database library (e.g., SQLAlchemy for Python, PDO for PHP) to handle the actual database operations.
    • Ensure that the class handles connection pooling, error handling, and transaction management.
  3. Add Configuration Management:

    • Allow the wrapper to accept configuration parameters (e.g., database type, host, port, credentials) to support different environments.
    • Use environment variables or configuration files to manage these settings.
  4. Write Unit Tests:

    • Develop unit tests to ensure that the wrapper behaves as expected.
    • Mock the database operations to test the wrapper independently of the actual database.
  5. Documentation:

    • Update the project documentation to include usage examples and configuration instructions for the Database wrapper.

About backward compatibility

The implementation of the Database wrapper should maintain backward compatibility by ensuring that existing code can still interact with the database through the new wrapper without requiring changes. This can be achieved by providing the same method signatures and expected behaviors as the current database interaction code.

Test these changes locally

git checkout -b gitauto/issue-#83-2bdc6d36-b3f0-4ec0-ab17-f46887c159b3
git pull origin gitauto/issue-#83-2bdc6d36-b3f0-4ec0-ab17-f46887c159b3

Copy link

deepsource-io bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 3ee8b2e..c231a1b. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource SQL LogoSQL✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource PHP LogoPHP✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Docker LogoDocker✅ SuccessView Check ↗

Code Coverage Report

MetricAggregatePhp
Branch Coverage100%100%
Composite Coverage95.8%95.8%
Line Coverage95.8%95.8%

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

Copy link

codacy-production bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.00% (target: -1.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (3ee8b2e) 236 226 95.76%
Head commit (c231a1b) 236 (+0) 226 (+0) 95.76% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#205) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.65%. Comparing base (3ee8b2e) to head (c231a1b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #205   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.65%   95.65%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         230      230           
=======================================
  Hits          220      220           
  Misses         10       10           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@gstraccini gstraccini bot requested a review from guibranco August 22, 2024 09:06
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added 🤖 bot Issue/Pull request created by bot 🚦awaiting triage Awaiting triage labels Aug 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

11:29PM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
11:29PM INF 148 commits scanned.
11:29PM INF scan completed in 423ms
11:29PM INF no leaks found

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 26, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@guibranco guibranco closed this Aug 27, 2024
@guibranco guibranco deleted the gitauto/issue-#83-2bdc6d36-b3f0-4ec0-ab17-f46887c159b3 branch August 27, 2024 12:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🚦awaiting triage Awaiting triage 🤖 bot Issue/Pull request created by bot size/L
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant