-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Delete assets/css/style.scss #369
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@guibranco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 5 seconds before requesting another review. β How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. π¦ How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Infisical secrets check: β No secrets leaked! π» Scan logs10:24AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
10:24AM INF 559 commits scanned.
10:24AM INF scan completed in 309ms
10:24AM INF no leaks found
|
β Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 2.3.1667 failed (commit 414d4d5998 by @guibranco) |
Closes #
π Description
β Checks
β’οΈ Does this introduce a breaking change?
βΉ Additional Information