Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GitAuto: [FEATURE] Add Integration Tests project with WireMock fixture #354

Closed

Conversation

gitauto-ai[bot]
Copy link

@gitauto-ai gitauto-ai bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Resolves #173

What is the feature

Add comprehensive integration tests for the C# integration library that interacts with the VTEX HTTP REST API. This includes setting up a testing project using XUnit, WireMock for simulating HTTP responses, Snapshooter for snapshot testing, NSubstitute for mocking dependencies, and Bogus for generating realistic fake data.

Why we need the feature

Currently, the integration testing coverage for the HTTP ERP service is insufficient, posing a risk of undetected issues in the library's interactions with the ERP service. Without proper integration tests, bugs and unreliable behavior may go unnoticed in production, affecting the reliability and stability of the application.

How to implement and why

  1. Set Up Integration Tests:

    • Create Test Project: Initialize a new test project within the Tests directory if it doesn't exist.
    • Add Dependencies: Incorporate necessary packages such as XUnit, WireMock.Net, Snapshooter, NSubstitute, and Bogus to facilitate comprehensive testing.
  2. Configure WireMock for Fake HTTP Requests:

    • Simulate ERP Service: Use WireMock to mock various HTTP responses from the ERP service, enabling the testing of different scenarios without relying on the actual API.
  3. Implement Snapshot Testing with Snapshooter:

    • Ensure Response Consistency: Utilize Snapshooter to capture and compare responses, ensuring that the integration library consistently handles data as expected.
  4. Generate Realistic Test Data with Bogus:

    • Create Fake Data: Employ Bogus to generate realistic fake data, such as order details and customer information, enhancing the reliability of the tests.
  5. Mock Dependencies with NSubstitute:

    • Isolate Components: Use NSubstitute to mock dependencies unrelated to ERP service interactions, allowing for isolated and focused testing of the integration library.
  6. Run and Validate Tests:

    • Execute Tests: Run all integration tests to verify coverage and correctness.
    • Refine Tests: Iterate on test cases based on results and team feedback to ensure comprehensive scenario coverage.

This step-by-step approach ensures that the integration library is thoroughly tested against various scenarios, improving reliability and reducing the likelihood of production issues.

About backward compatibility

Adding integration tests does not introduce any changes to the existing library's functionality or public interfaces. Therefore, there are no concerns regarding backward compatibility. The tests enhance the development process by providing better coverage without affecting existing consumers of the library.

Test these changes locally

git checkout -b gitauto/issue-173-914b6b3e-a9ac-4cef-9124-8d895fca4196
git pull origin gitauto/issue-173-914b6b3e-a9ac-4cef-9124-8d895fca4196

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 8, 2024
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added .NET Pull requests that update .net code dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file enhancement New feature or request gitauto GitAuto label to trigger the app in a issue. resilience tests Tests (Unit, Integration, Load, Stress, User Acceptance) ⚙️ CI/CD Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment processes 📝 documentation Tasks related to writing or updating documentation 🚨 security Security-related issues or improvements labels Nov 8, 2024
@gstraccini gstraccini bot requested a review from guibranco November 8, 2024 00:09
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added 🚦 awaiting triage Items that are awaiting triage or categorization 🤖 bot Automated processes or integrations labels Nov 8, 2024
Copy link
Author

gitauto-ai bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Committed the Check Run linter-check error fix! Running it again...

Copy link
Author

gitauto-ai bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Committed the Check Run Deep Source Coverage report error fix! Running it again...

@github-actions github-actions bot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs
12:11AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:11AM INF 529 commits scanned.
12:11AM INF scan completed in 301ms
12:11AM INF no leaks found

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 2.3.1579 failed (commit 17938f3413 by @gitauto-ai[bot])

@guibranco guibranco closed this Nov 13, 2024
@guibranco guibranco deleted the gitauto/issue-173-914b6b3e-a9ac-4cef-9124-8d895fca4196 branch November 13, 2024 18:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🚦 awaiting triage Items that are awaiting triage or categorization 🤖 bot Automated processes or integrations ⚙️ CI/CD Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment processes dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file 📝 documentation Tasks related to writing or updating documentation enhancement New feature or request gitauto GitAuto label to trigger the app in a issue. .NET Pull requests that update .net code resilience 🚨 security Security-related issues or improvements size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. tests Tests (Unit, Integration, Load, Stress, User Acceptance)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[FEATURE] Add Integration Tests project with WireMock fixture
2 participants