Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update package.json #325

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024
Merged

Update package.json #325

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Owner

@guibranco guibranco commented Oct 18, 2024

User description

Closes #

πŸ“‘ Description

βœ… Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

☒️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

β„Ή Additional Information


Description

  • Enhanced the formatting of the package.json file for improved readability.
  • No changes were made to the dependencies or scripts.

Changes walkthrough πŸ“

Relevant files
Formatting
package.json
Improve formatting of package.json fileΒ  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β 

docs/package.json

  • Reformatted JSON structure for better readability.
  • Maintained existing dependencies and scripts.
  • +25/-24Β 

    πŸ’‘ Penify usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available Penify tools and their descriptions

    Summary by CodeRabbit

    • Chores
      • Updated the formatting of the docs/package.json file for improved readability, with no changes to the actual content or structure.

    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Oct 18, 2024

    Walkthrough

    The pull request involves a complete replacement of the docs/package.json file content. The changes focus on formatting adjustments, specifically the spacing and indentation, resulting in a more compact style. The logical structure and content of the JSON object remain unchanged, preserving all properties such as name, version, private, scripts, dependencies, and browserslist.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    docs/package.json Complete replacement of content with formatting adjustments.

    Possibly related PRs

    Suggested labels

    documentation, size/XS, β˜‘οΈ auto-merge, Review effort [1-5]: 1

    Poem

    πŸ‡ In the land of code, so neat and bright,
    A package was polished, all done just right.
    With spaces tucked in and lines all aligned,
    Our JSON now sparkles, perfectly refined!
    Hooray for the changes, let’s hop with glee,
    For tidy old files bring joy, you see! 🌟


    πŸ“œ Recent review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL

    πŸ“₯ Commits

    Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2c31a2e and 1ea1075.

    πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
    • docs/package.json (1 hunks)
    βœ… Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
    • docs/package.json

    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    ❀️ Share
    πŸͺ§ Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    @penify-dev penify-dev bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 18, 2024
    @github-actions github-actions bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 18, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Oct 18, 2024

    PR Review πŸ”

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    1, because the changes are purely formatting and do not affect functionality or introduce new logic.

    πŸ§ͺΒ Relevant tests

    No

    ⚑ Possible issues

    No

    πŸ”’Β Security concerns

    No

    Copy link

    socket-security bot commented Oct 18, 2024

    New dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub β†—οΈŽ

    Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
    npm/@docusaurus/[email protected] Transitive: environment, eval, filesystem, network, shell, unsafe +615 66.6 MB slorber
    npm/@docusaurus/[email protected] environment Transitive: eval, filesystem, network, shell, unsafe +463 64.6 MB slorber

    View full reportβ†—οΈŽ

    Copy link

    socket-security bot commented Oct 18, 2024

    Report is too large to display inline.
    View full reportβ†—οΈŽ

    Next steps

    Mark a package as acceptable risk

    To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/[email protected] or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

    Copy link
    Contributor

    penify-dev bot commented Oct 18, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestionΒ  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Β  Score
    Enhancement
    Add a description field to enhance the package metadata

    Consider adding a "description" field to provide context about the package's purpose.

    docs/package.json [1]

     {
        "name":"vtex-sdk-docs",
        "version":"0.0.1",
    +   "description": "Documentation for VTEX SDK",
        "private":true,
        "scripts":{
           "start":"docusaurus start",
           "build":"docusaurus build",
           "serve":"docusaurus serve"
        },
        "dependencies":{
           "@docusaurus/core":"^2.0.0",
           "@docusaurus/preset-classic":"^2.0.0"
        },
        "browserslist":{
           "production":[
              ">0.2%",
              "not dead",
              "not op_mini all"
           ],
           "development":[
              "last 1 chrome version",
              "last 1 firefox version",
              "last 1 safari version"
           ]
        }
     }
     
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Adding a "description" field would enhance the package metadata and provide clarity about its purpose, which is beneficial for maintainability and usability. However, it is not a critical change, hence the score.

    7

    @guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) October 18, 2024 00:04
    @gstraccini gstraccini bot added the β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Oct 18, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    Infisical secrets check: βœ… No secrets leaked!

    πŸ’» Scan logs
    12:20AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
    12:20AM INF 288 commits scanned.
    12:20AM INF scan completed in 193ms
    12:20AM INF no leaks found
    

    Copy link

    Coverage summary from Codacy

    See diff coverage on Codacy

    Coverage variation Diff coverage
    βœ… +0.00% (target: -1.00%) βœ… βˆ…
    Coverage variation details
    Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
    Common ancestor commit (1962203) 1774 4 0.23%
    Head commit (0b098aa) 1774 (+0) 4 (+0) 0.23% (+0.00%)

    Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

    Diff coverage details
    Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
    Pull request (#325) 0 0 βˆ… (not applicable)

    Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

    See your quality gate settingsΒ Β Β Β Change summary preferences

    Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

    Copy link

    @AppVeyorBot
    Copy link

    βœ… Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 2.3.1124 completed (commit 8d8337a4c9 by @gstraccini[bot])

    @guibranco guibranco merged commit 54e8328 into main Oct 18, 2024
    26 of 27 checks passed
    @guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-2 branch October 18, 2024 01:13
    Copy link

    codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2024

    Codecov Report

    All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests βœ…

    Project coverage is 0.22%. Comparing base (1962203) to head (0b098aa).
    Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

    Additional details and impacted files
    @@          Coverage Diff          @@
    ##            main    #325   +/-   ##
    =====================================
      Coverage   0.22%   0.22%           
    =====================================
      Files        117     117           
      Lines       1774    1774           
      Branches      75      75           
    =====================================
      Hits           4       4           
    + Misses      1770    1768    -2     
    - Partials       0       2    +2     

    β˜” View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
    πŸ“’ Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 1 size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants