Update AppVeyor Configuration by Removing SONAR_TOKEN

[guibranco]

User description

Resolves #ISSUE_NUMBER

---

Before the change?

After the change?

Pull request checklist

• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features)
• Docs have been reviewed and added/updated if needed (for bug fixes/features)

Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

---

---

Description

• Enhanced the AppVeyor configuration by removing the SONAR_TOKEN environment variable.
• Maintained the security of other tokens in the configuration.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Configuration changes	appveyor.yml Update AppVeyor Configuration by Removing SONAR_TOKEN        appveyor.yml Removed the SONAR_TOKEN environment variable. Kept CODACY_PROJECT_TOKEN and CODECLIMATE_TOKEN secure tokens. +0/-2

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated CI/CD pipeline configuration for improved build process.
  • Removed unnecessary environment variable for security.
  • Streamlined commands for coverage reporting and artifact management.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in the pull request primarily involve updates to the appveyor.yml configuration for the AppVeyor CI/CD pipeline. Key modifications include the removal of the SONAR_TOKEN environment variable, while retaining CODACY_PROJECT_TOKEN and CODECLIMATE_TOKEN. The build process has been refined with new installations for opencover.portable and codecov, as well as adjustments to the PowerShell commands in the build_script section to improve parameter handling. The deployment settings for NuGet and GitHub have also been specified, particularly for the main branch.

Changes

File	Change Summary
appveyor.yml	- Removed SONAR_TOKEN from environment variables.
	- Retained CODACY_PROJECT_TOKEN and CODECLIMATE_TOKEN.
	- Updated before_build to install opencover.portable and codecov, and download reporters.
	- Restructured PowerShell commands in build_script for better parameter handling.
	- Streamlined coverage reporting commands.
	- Maintained after_build structure with commands for copying artifacts and reports.
	- Specified deployment settings for NuGet and GitHub with conditions for the main branch.

Poem

In the land of code where bunnies hop,
The builds are swift, they never stop.
With tokens trimmed and paths refined,
Our CI/CD is now aligned.
So let’s rejoice, with carrots in hand,
For smoother builds across the land! 🐰✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cfbd8f8 and af3a71c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• appveyor.yml (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• appveyor.yml

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[penify-dev]

PR Review 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	1, because the changes are straightforward and involve the removal of a single environment variable without affecting the overall functionality.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
⚡ Possible issues	No
🔒 Security concerns	No

[penify-dev]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Security	Remove sensitive token values from the configuration file for better security practices Consider removing the secure token values from the configuration file to enhance security, as they can be exposed in version control. appveyor.yml [7-9] -CODACY_PROJECT_TOKEN: - secure: 8fnQaRryh/pMRB9NtqyX0M0FSfPYW8Rtl1zeYcMXLVaK0o1UC3EAynZSB6rze5wM -CODECLIMATE_TOKEN: +CODACY_PROJECT_TOKEN: + secure: <your-secure-token-here> +CODECLIMATE_TOKEN: + secure: <your-secure-token-here> Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: The suggestion addresses a significant security concern by recommending the removal of sensitive token values from the configuration file, which is crucial for protecting sensitive information in version control.	9

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (cfbd8f8)	1774	4	0.23%
Head commit (af3a71c)	1774 (+0)	4 (+0)	0.23% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#311)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.22%. Comparing base (cfbd8f8) to head (af3a71c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #311   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   0.22%   0.22%           
=====================================
  Files        117     117           
  Lines       1774    1774           
  Branches      75      75           
=====================================
  Hits           4       4           
+ Misses      1770    1768    -2     
- Partials       0       2    +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[guibranco]

@gstraccini appveyor build pull request

[gstraccini]

AppVeyor build (pull request) started! 🚀

Build ID: 50726867
Version: 2.3.1050

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[AppVeyorBot]

✅ Build VTEX-SDK-dotnet 2.3.1050 completed (commit b7356aa10a by @guibranco)