Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete CONTRIBUTING.md #603

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2024
Merged

Delete CONTRIBUTING.md #603

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Owner

Closes #

πŸ“‘ Description

βœ… Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

☒️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

β„Ή Additional Information

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@gstraccini[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 17 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review.

βŒ› How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dee9385 and cec2a73.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❀️ Share
πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Infisical secrets check: βœ… No secrets leaked!

πŸ’» Scan logs
5:05AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
5:05AM INF 609 commits scanned.
5:05AM INF scan completed in 768ms
5:05AM INF no leaks found

@guibranco guibranco enabled auto-merge (squash) November 12, 2024 05:06
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Nov 12, 2024
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
βœ… -0.11% (target: -1.00%) βœ… βˆ…
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (dee9385) 3684 1627 44.16%
Head commit (cec2a73) 3684 (+0) 1623 (-4) 44.06% (-0.11%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#603) 0 0 βˆ… (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settingsΒ Β Β Β Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Nov 12, 2024

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

βœ… Build CrispyWaffle 9.0.24 completed (commit 9e6773b2ea by @guibranco)

@guibranco guibranco merged commit 38671d0 into main Nov 12, 2024
29 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-3 branch November 12, 2024 07:21
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests βœ…

Project coverage is 40.67%. Comparing base (dee9385) to head (cec2a73).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #603   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   40.67%   40.67%           
=======================================
  Files          83       83           
  Lines        3634     3634           
  Branches      519      519           
=======================================
  Hits         1478     1478           
  Misses       2053     2053           
  Partials      103      103           

β˜” View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
πŸ“’ Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants