Update CouchDBCacheRepository.cs

[guibranco]

Closes #

📑 Description

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

☢️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

• Yes
• No

ℹ Additional Information

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Improved comments and documentation for methods to enhance clarity and readability.
  • Updated punctuation and phrasing for consistency across documentation.

No functional changes were made; the underlying functionality remains intact.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in CouchDBCacheRepository.cs consist of updates to comments and documentation aimed at improving clarity and consistency. These modifications include punctuation adjustments and refinements in phrasing for various methods, without affecting method signatures or the underlying functionality of the class. The overall structure, logic, and exception handling remain unchanged.

Changes

File	Change Summary
Src/CrispyWaffle.CouchDB/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepository.cs	Minor modifications to comments and documentation for methods like GetDocCount<T>(), Clear<T>(), and others, focusing on clarity and consistency. No changes to method signatures or functionality.

Possibly related PRs

• Improve documentation in RedisExtensions.cs #542: This PR involves minor modifications to documentation comments in RedisExtensions.cs, similar to the changes made in CouchDBCacheRepository.cs, which also focused on enhancing comment clarity without altering functionality.
• Update version to 8.2 and enhance changelog #554: This PR includes formatting adjustments in CouchDBCacheRepository.cs, specifically improving documentation comments, aligning closely with the main PR's focus on enhancing comment clarity and readability.

Suggested labels

documentation, enhancement, size/XS, ☑️ auto-merge, Review effort [1-5]: 1

Suggested reviewers

• gstraccini

🐰 In the code, we hop and play,
Comments polished, bright as day.
Clarity shines, like the morning dew,
Enhancements made, just for you!
With every line, we strive to be,
A clearer path for all to see! 🌟

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (38671d0)	3684	1623	44.06%
Head commit (2826ed5)	3684 (+0)	1623 (+0)	44.06% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#601)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[AppVeyorBot]

✅ Build CrispyWaffle 9.0.20 completed (commit da4f4c8c7e by @guibranco)

[github-actions]

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

💻 Scan logs

7:22AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
7:22AM INF 609 commits scanned.
7:22AM INF scan completed in 766ms
7:22AM INF no leaks found

[AppVeyorBot]

✅ Build CrispyWaffle 9.0.27 completed (commit 1c039d3f44 by @gstraccini[bot])

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 40.67%. Comparing base (38671d0) to head (2826ed5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #601      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   40.50%   40.67%   +0.16%     
==========================================
  Files          83       83              
  Lines        3634     3634              
  Branches      519      519              
==========================================
+ Hits         1472     1478       +6     
+ Misses       2057     2053       -4     
+ Partials      105      103       -2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud