Implement Asynchronous Operations for Cache Repositories #562
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
the
size/XL
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes across multiple classes in the CrispyWaffle project, primarily converting synchronous methods to asynchronous counterparts. This transition includes updating method signatures and implementations to use Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewersPoem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![gstraccini[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/480132?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
gstraccini
bot
added
the
🚦 awaiting triage
penify-dev
bot
changed the title
PR Review 🔍
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
Tests/CrispyWaffle.Tests/Cache/CacheManagerTests.cs (2)
Line range hint
57-68: Update the test method to be async.The test method has been renamed to
Remove_ShouldRemoveValueFromAllRepositoriesAsyncwhich implies it's an async test, but the method itself is still synchronous.Please update the test method to be async and use
CacheManager.RemoveAsyncinstead ofCacheManager.Removeto fully validate the async behavior.[Fact] public async Task Remove_ShouldRemoveValueFromAllRepositoriesAsync() { // Arrange var key = "test-key"; // Act await CacheManager.RemoveAsync(key); // Assert _mockRepository1.Verify(m => m.RemoveAsync(key), Times.Once); _mockRepository2.Verify(m => m.RemoveAsync(key), Times.Once); }
44-47: Remove commented out code.Please remove the commented out lines of code as they seem to be leftovers from the test method update. It's a good practice to clean up the code before committing changes.
Tests/CrispyWaffle.Tests/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepositoryTests.cs (1)
Line range hint
65-76: Update the test method name and comments to accurately describe the test scenario.The current test method is testing the scenario where the
GetAsyncmethod is called with a key that has not been set, and it correctly asserts that the returned value is null. However, the test method name and comments suggest that it is testing the scenario of retrieving a stored value, which is misleading.Consider updating the test method name and comments to something like:
/// <summary> /// Tests that the GetAsync method returns null for a key that has not been set. /// </summary> [Fact] public async Task GetFromDatabase_ShouldReturnNullForNonExistentKey() { // ... }Additionally, consider adding a new test method to test the scenario of retrieving a stored value:
[Fact] public async Task GetFromDatabase_ShouldReturnStoredValue() { // Arrange var key = "test-key"; var expectedValue = "test-value"; await _repository.SetAsync(expectedValue, key); // Act var actualValue = await _repository.GetAsync<string>(key); // Assert actualValue.Should().Be(expectedValue); }Src/CrispyWaffle/Cache/MemoryCacheRepository.cs (5)
40-40: Consider removing the unusedttlparameter.The
ttlparameter is not being used, and the comment indicates it's not implemented yet. To avoid confusion, consider removing this parameter until TTL functionality is implemented.Apply this diff to remove the unused parameter:
-public async Task SetAsync<T>(T value, string key, TimeSpan? ttl = null) +public async Task SetAsync<T>(T value, string key)
Line range hint
66-74: Update the implementation to be asynchronous.The method signature has been updated to return a
Task<T>, indicating it's asynchronous, but the implementation is still synchronous. To align with the asynchronous signature, consider usingTask.FromResultto return the value asynchronously.Apply this diff to make the method asynchronous:
public async Task<T> GetAsync<T>(string key) { if (!_data.TryGetValue(key, out var value)) { throw new InvalidOperationException($"Unable to get the item with key {key}"); } - return (T)value; + return await Task.FromResult((T)value); }
Line range hint
84-95: Update the implementation to be asynchronous.The method signature has been updated to return a
Task<T>, indicating it's asynchronous, but the implementation is still synchronous. To align with the asynchronous signature, consider usingTask.FromResultto return the value asynchronously.Apply this diff to make the method asynchronous:
public async Task<T> GetAsync<T>(string key, string subKey) { var finalKey = $"{key}-{subKey}"; if (!_hash.TryGetValue(finalKey, out var value)) { throw new InvalidOperationException( $"Unable to get the item with key {key} and sub key {subKey}" ); } - return (T)value; + return await Task.FromResult((T)value); }
Line range hint
142-148: Update the implementation to be asynchronous.The method signature has been updated to return a
Task, indicating it's asynchronous, but the implementation is still synchronous. To align with the asynchronous signature, consider usingTask.CompletedTaskto make the method asynchronous.Apply this diff to make the method asynchronous:
public async Task RemoveAsync(string key) { if (_data.ContainsKey(key)) { _data.TryRemove(key, out _); } + await Task.CompletedTask; }
Line range hint
155-162: Update the implementation to be asynchronous.The method signature has been updated to return a
Task, indicating it's asynchronous, but the implementation is still synchronous. To align with the asynchronous signature, consider usingTask.CompletedTaskto make the method asynchronous.Apply this diff to make the method asynchronous:
public async Task RemoveAsync(string key, string subKey) { var finalKey = $"{key}-{subKey}"; if (_data.ContainsKey(finalKey)) { _hash.TryRemove(finalKey, out _); } + await Task.CompletedTask; }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (10)
- Src/CrispyWaffle.CouchDB/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepository.cs (18 hunks)
- Src/CrispyWaffle.Redis/Cache/RedisCacheRepository.cs (12 hunks)
- Src/CrispyWaffle.Utils/Communications/SmtpMailer.cs (2 hunks)
- Src/CrispyWaffle/Cache/CacheManager.cs (27 hunks)
- Src/CrispyWaffle/Cache/ICacheRepository.cs (5 hunks)
- Src/CrispyWaffle/Cache/MemoryCacheRepository.cs (9 hunks)
- Tests/CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepositoryTests.cs (6 hunks)
- Tests/CrispyWaffle.Tests/Cache/CacheManagerTests.cs (3 hunks)
- Tests/CrispyWaffle.Tests/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepositoryTests.cs (4 hunks)
- Tests/CrispyWaffle.Tests/Cache/MemoryCacheRepositoryTests.cs (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (63)
Tests/CrispyWaffle.Tests/Cache/MemoryCacheRepositoryTests.cs (3)
19-32: LGTM!The test method has been correctly updated to reflect the async nature of the
SetAsyncandGetAsyncmethods. The test method is correctly testing theSetAsyncmethod of theMemoryCacheRepositoryclass and is correctly using theGetAsyncmethod to retrieve the stored value from the cache. The test method is also correctly comparing the retrieved value with the expected value using theShould().Be()assertion.
35-48: LGTM!The test method has been correctly updated to reflect the async nature of the
SetAsyncandGetAsyncmethods. The test method is correctly testing theGetAsyncmethod of theMemoryCacheRepositoryclass and is correctly using theSetAsyncmethod to store a value in the cache. The test method is also correctly comparing the retrieved value with the expected value using theShould().Be()assertion.
Line range hint
50-64: LGTM!The test method has been correctly updated to reflect the async nature of the
SetAsync,RemoveAsync, andGetAsyncmethods. The test method is correctly testing theRemoveAsyncmethod of theMemoryCacheRepositoryclass and is correctly using theSetAsyncmethod to store a value in the cache and theRemoveAsyncmethod to remove the stored value from the cache. The test method is also correctly using theAssert.ThrowsAsyncmethod to assert that theGetAsyncmethod throws anInvalidOperationExceptionwhen trying to retrieve the removed value from the cache.Tests/CrispyWaffle.Tests/Cache/CacheManagerTests.cs (3)
19-20: LGTM!The change to use
CacheManager.AddRepositoryAsyncis consistent with the PR objective of converting cache operations to async. The mock repositories are being added asynchronously in the constructor, which is the correct approach.
24-35: Test updated correctly for async/await!The test method has been appropriately updated to:
- Use async/await syntax.
- Call the async
SetAsyncmethod instead of the syncSetmethod.- Verify that the async
SetAsyncmethod is called on the mock repositories.These changes are consistent with the PR objective of converting cache operations to async.
39-51: Test updated correctly for async/await!The test method has been appropriately updated to:
- Use async/await syntax.
- Call the async
GetAsyncmethod instead of the syncGetmethod.- Setup the mock repository to return a tuple asynchronously from
TryGetAsync.These changes are consistent with the PR objective of converting cache operations to async.
Src/CrispyWaffle/Cache/ICacheRepository.cs (11)
2-2: LGTM!The
using System.Threading.Tasks;statement is necessary for usingTaskandTask<T>types in the interface.
26-32: LGTM!The
SetAsync<T>method has been correctly introduced to replace the synchronousSet<T>method. The method signature and documentation are consistent with the asynchronous nature of the operation.
41-47: LGTM!The
SetAsync<T>overload method has been correctly introduced to replace the synchronousSet<T>overload method. The method signature and documentation are consistent with the asynchronous nature of the operation.
54-61: LGTM!The
GetAsync<T>method has been correctly introduced to replace the synchronousGet<T>method. The method signature and documentation are consistent with the asynchronous nature of the operation.
69-75: LGTM!The
GetAsync<T>overload method has been correctly introduced to replace the synchronousGet<T>overload method. The method signature and documentation are consistent with the asynchronous nature of the operation.
84-86: LGTM!The
TryGetAsync<T>method has been correctly introduced to replace the synchronousTryGet<T>method. The method signature and documentation are consistent with the asynchronous nature of the operation. The change in the return type fromoutparameter to a tuple is a good improvement for usability and readability.
95-97: LGTM!The
TryGetAsync<T>overload method has been correctly introduced to replace the synchronousTryGet<T>overload method. The method signature and documentation are consistent with the asynchronous nature of the operation. The change in the return type fromoutparameter to a tuple is a good improvement for usability and readability.
103-104: LGTM!The
RemoveAsyncmethod has been correctly introduced to replace the synchronousRemovemethod. The method signature and documentation are consistent with the asynchronous nature of the operation.
111-112: LGTM!The
RemoveAsyncoverload method has been correctly introduced to replace the synchronousRemoveoverload method. The method signature and documentation are consistent with the asynchronous nature of the operation.
118-119: LGTM!The
TTLAsyncmethod has been correctly introduced to replace the synchronousTTLmethod. The method signature and documentation are consistent with the asynchronous nature of the operation.
124-124: LGTM!The
ClearAsyncmethod has been correctly introduced to replace the synchronousClearmethod. The method signature is consistent with the asynchronous nature of the operation.Src/CrispyWaffle/Cache/MemoryCacheRepository.cs (2)
40-43: LGTM!The method has been correctly updated to be asynchronous using
Task.Run.
53-57: LGTM!The method has been correctly updated to be asynchronous using
Task.Run.Tests/CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepositoryTests.cs (6)
38-49: LGTM!The test method has been correctly updated to use the async versions of the
CouchDBCacheRepositorymethods. The changes are consistent with the async updates made to the repository.
62-84: LGTM!The test method has been correctly updated to use the async versions of the
CouchDBCacheRepositorymethods for setting, getting, and removing specificCarobjects. The changes are consistent with the async updates made to the repository.
96-107: LGTM!The test method has been correctly updated to use the async versions of the
CouchDBCacheRepositorymethods for setting, removing, and getting aCouchDBCacheDocument. The changes are consistent with the async updates made to the repository.
120-131: LGTM!The test method has been correctly updated to use the async versions of the
CouchDBCacheRepositorymethods for setting, removing, and getting a specificCarobject. The changes are consistent with the async updates made to the repository.
Line range hint
146-157: LGTM!The test method has been correctly updated to use the async versions of the
CouchDBCacheRepositorymethods for setting multiple documents and clearing the repository. The changes are consistent with the async updates made to the repository.
174-187: LGTM!The test method has been correctly updated to use the async versions of the
CouchDBCacheRepositorymethods for setting a document with a TTL and getting the document. The changes are consistent with the async updates made to the repository.Src/CrispyWaffle.Utils/Communications/SmtpMailer.cs (2)
342-343: LGTM!The change from
CacheManager.TryGettoCacheManager.TryGetAsyncis correct and aligns with the goal of making the function fully asynchronous. This enhances the method's responsiveness by allowing other operations to proceed while waiting for the cache check to complete.
376-376: LGTM!The change from
CacheManager.SettoCacheManager.SetAsyncis correct and aligns with the goal of making cache operations asynchronous. This indicates a shift towards a fully asynchronous approach for setting cache values, which is likely aimed at improving performance and scalability.Src/CrispyWaffle.Redis/Cache/RedisCacheRepository.cs (10)
Line range hint
160-184: LGTM!The
SetAsyncmethod correctly implements the asynchronous logic to set a value in the cache with an optional TTL. The exception handling is also implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag.
Line range hint
191-210: LGTM!The
SetAsyncoverload correctly implements the asynchronous logic to set a value in the cache with a sub-key. The method retrieves all values, updates the value for the sub-key, and sets all values back using the appropriate asynchronous methods. The exception handling is also implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag.
Line range hint
219-245: LGTM!The
GetAsyncmethod correctly implements the asynchronous logic to retrieve a value from the cache by key. The method checks the existence of the key and retrieves the value using the appropriate asynchronous methods. The exception handling is implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag, and anInvalidOperationExceptionis thrown with an appropriate message if the key doesn't exist.
Line range hint
256-286: LGTM!The
GetAsyncoverload correctly implements the asynchronous logic to retrieve a value from the cache by key and sub-key. The method checks the existence of the sub-key within the key and retrieves the value using the appropriate asynchronous methods. The exception handling is implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag, and anInvalidOperationExceptionis thrown with an appropriate message if the key and sub-key combination doesn't exist.
Line range hint
297-316: LGTM!The
TryGetAsyncmethod correctly implements the asynchronous logic to attempt retrieving a value from the cache by key and return a tuple indicating the existence and the value. The method retrieves the value and checks the existence using the appropriate asynchronous methods. The exception handling is implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag, and the method returns an appropriate tuple with the existence flag and the value (default value if not found).
Line range hint
326-347: LGTM!The
TryGetAsyncoverload correctly implements the asynchronous logic to attempt retrieving a value from the cache by key and sub-key and return a tuple indicating the existence and the value. The method retrieves the value and checks the existence using the appropriate asynchronous methods. The exception handling is implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag, and the method returns an appropriate tuple with the existence flag and the value (default value if not found).
Line range hint
353-369: LGTM!The
RemoveAsyncmethod correctly implements the asynchronous logic to remove a value from the cache by key. The method uses the appropriate asynchronous method to remove the value. The exception handling is implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag.
Line range hint
375-390: LGTM!The
RemoveAsyncoverload correctly implements the asynchronous logic to remove a value from the cache by key and sub-key. The method uses the appropriate asynchronous method to remove the value. The exception handling is implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag.
Line range hint
397-415: LGTM!The
TTLAsyncmethod correctly implements the logic to retrieve the time to live (TTL) of a key in the cache. The method uses the appropriate method to retrieve the TTL. The exception handling is implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag, and the method returns an appropriate value (TimeSpan.Zero) if the key doesn't exist or has already expired.
Line range hint
420-435: LGTM!The
ClearAsyncmethod correctly implements the asynchronous logic to clear the entire cache. The method uses the appropriate asynchronous method to clear the cache. The exception handling is implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag.Src/CrispyWaffle.CouchDB/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepository.cs (12)
48-50: LGTM!The
ClearAsyncmethod is implemented correctly using async/await andTask.Runto execute the genericClearAsyncmethod asynchronously.
Line range hint
65-79: LGTM!The
ClearAsync<T>method is implemented correctly using async/await andTask.Runto execute the delete operations asynchronously. The exception handling is also implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag.
93-100: LGTM!The
GetAsync<T>(string key)method is implemented correctly. It checks if the typeTis assignable fromCouchDBCacheDocument, calls theGetSpecificAsyncmethod to retrieve the document, and casts the result toT.
118-125: LGTM!The
GetAsync<T>(string key, string subKey)method is implemented correctly. It checks if the typeTis assignable fromCouchDBCacheDocument, calls theGetSpecificAsyncmethod to retrieve the document, and casts the result toT.
135-140: LGTM!The
GetSpecificAsync<T>(string key)method is implemented correctly using async/await andTask.Runto execute the database query asynchronously. The expiration check and exception handling are also implemented correctly.
178-185: LGTM!The
GetSpecificAsync<T>(string key, string subKey)method is implemented correctly using async/await andTask.Runto execute the database query asynchronously. The expiration check and exception handling are also implemented correctly.
211-213: LGTM!The
RemoveAsync(string key)method is implemented correctly. It calls theRemoveSpecificAsyncmethod to remove the document.
227-229: LGTM!The
RemoveAsync(string key, string subKey)method is implemented correctly. It calls theRemoveSpecificAsyncmethod to remove the document.
237-243: LGTM!The
RemoveSpecificAsync<T>(string key)method is implemented correctly using async/await andTask.Runto execute the database operations asynchronously. The exception handling is also implemented correctly.
274-280: LGTM!The
RemoveSpecificAsync<T>(string key, string subKey)method is implemented correctly using async/await andTask.Runto execute the database operations asynchronously. The exception handling is also implemented correctly.
299-306: LGTM!The
SetAsync<T>(T value, string key, TimeSpan? ttl = null)method is implemented correctly. It checks if the typeTis assignable fromCouchDBCacheDocumentand calls theSetSpecificAsyncmethod to set the value.
322-329: LGTM!The
SetAsync<T>(T value, string key, string subKey)method is implemented correctly. It checks if the typeTis assignable fromCouchDBCacheDocumentand calls theSetSpecificAsyncmethod to set the value.
| public async Task SetToDatabase_ShouldStoreValueAsync() | ||
| { | ||
| // Arrange | ||
| var key = "test-key"; | ||
| var value = "test-value"; | ||
|
|
||
| // Act | ||
| _repository.Set(value, key); | ||
| await _repository.SetAsync(value, key); | ||
|
|
||
| // Assert | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add assertions to verify that the value was stored correctly.
The test method is missing assertions to verify that the SetAsync method correctly stored the value in the database. Consider adding assertions to check that the value can be retrieved using the GetAsync method after calling SetAsync.
Here's an example of how you can add assertions:
// Assert
var storedValue = await _repository.GetAsync<string>(key);
storedValue.Should().Be(value);| public async Task RemoveFromDatabase_ShouldRemoveValueAsync() | ||
| { | ||
| // Arrange | ||
| var key = "test-key"; | ||
|
|
||
| // Act | ||
| _repository.Remove(key); | ||
| await _repository.RemoveAsync(key); | ||
|
|
||
| // Assert | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add assertions to verify that the value was removed correctly.
The test method is missing assertions to verify that the RemoveAsync method correctly removed the value from the database. Consider adding assertions to check that the value cannot be retrieved using the GetAsync method after calling RemoveAsync.
Here's an example of how you can add assertions:
// Arrange
var key = "test-key";
var value = "test-value";
await _repository.SetAsync(value, key);
// Act
await _repository.RemoveAsync(key);
// Assert
var removedValue = await _repository.GetAsync<string>(key);
removedValue.Should().BeNull();| public async Task<(bool Exists, T value)> TryGetAsync<T>(string key) | ||
| { | ||
| value = default; | ||
| T value = default; | ||
| if (!_data.TryGetValue(key, out var temp)) | ||
| { | ||
| return false; | ||
| return (false, value); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| value = (T)temp; | ||
| return true; | ||
| return (true, value); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update the implementation to be asynchronous.
The method signature has been updated to return a Task<(bool Exists, T value)>, indicating it's asynchronous, but the implementation is still synchronous. To align with the asynchronous signature, consider using Task.FromResult to return the tuple asynchronously.
Apply this diff to make the method asynchronous:
public async Task<(bool Exists, T value)> TryGetAsync<T>(string key)
{
T value = default;
if (!_data.TryGetValue(key, out var temp))
{
- return (false, value);
+ return await Task.FromResult((false, value));
}
value = (T)temp;
- return (true, value);
+ return await Task.FromResult((true, value));
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public async Task<(bool Exists, T value)> TryGetAsync<T>(string key) | |
| { | |
| value = default; | |
| T value = default; | |
| if (!_data.TryGetValue(key, out var temp)) | |
| { | |
| return false; | |
| return (false, value); | |
| } | |
| value = (T)temp; | |
| return true; | |
| return (true, value); | |
| } | |
| public async Task<(bool Exists, T value)> TryGetAsync<T>(string key) | |
| { | |
| T value = default; | |
| if (!_data.TryGetValue(key, out var temp)) | |
| { | |
| return await Task.FromResult((false, value)); | |
| } | |
| value = (T)temp; | |
| return await Task.FromResult((true, value)); | |
| } |
| public async Task<(bool Exists, T value)> TryGetAsync<T>(string key, string subKey) | ||
| { | ||
| value = default; | ||
| T value = default; | ||
| var finalKey = $"{key}-{subKey}"; | ||
| if (!_hash.TryGetValue(finalKey, out var temp)) | ||
| { | ||
| return false; | ||
| return (false, value); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| value = (T)temp; | ||
| return true; | ||
| return (true, value); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update the implementation to be asynchronous.
The method signature has been updated to return a Task<(bool Exists, T value)>, indicating it's asynchronous, but the implementation is still synchronous. To align with the asynchronous signature, consider using Task.FromResult to return the tuple asynchronously.
Apply this diff to make the method asynchronous:
public async Task<(bool Exists, T value)> TryGetAsync<T>(string key, string subKey)
{
T value = default;
var finalKey = $"{key}-{subKey}";
if (!_hash.TryGetValue(finalKey, out var temp))
{
- return (false, value);
+ return await Task.FromResult((false, value));
}
value = (T)temp;
- return (true, value);
+ return await Task.FromResult((true, value));
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public async Task<(bool Exists, T value)> TryGetAsync<T>(string key, string subKey) | |
| { | |
| value = default; | |
| T value = default; | |
| var finalKey = $"{key}-{subKey}"; | |
| if (!_hash.TryGetValue(finalKey, out var temp)) | |
| { | |
| return false; | |
| return (false, value); | |
| } | |
| value = (T)temp; | |
| return true; | |
| return (true, value); | |
| } | |
| public async Task<(bool Exists, T value)> TryGetAsync<T>(string key, string subKey) | |
| { | |
| T value = default; | |
| var finalKey = $"{key}-{subKey}"; | |
| if (!_hash.TryGetValue(finalKey, out var temp)) | |
| { | |
| return await Task.FromResult((false, value)); | |
| } | |
| value = (T)temp; | |
| return await Task.FromResult((true, value)); | |
| } |
| public async Task<TimeSpan> TTLAsync(string key) | ||
| { | ||
| return new TimeSpan(0); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update the implementation to be asynchronous.
The method signature has been updated to return a Task<TimeSpan>, indicating it's asynchronous, but the implementation is still synchronous. To align with the asynchronous signature, consider using Task.FromResult to return the TimeSpan asynchronously.
Apply this diff to make the method asynchronous:
public async Task<TimeSpan> TTLAsync(string key)
{
- return new TimeSpan(0);
+ return await Task.FromResult(new TimeSpan(0));
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public async Task<TimeSpan> TTLAsync(string key) | |
| { | |
| return new TimeSpan(0); | |
| } | |
| public async Task<TimeSpan> TTLAsync(string key) | |
| { | |
| return await Task.FromResult(new TimeSpan(0)); | |
| } |
|
✅ Build CrispyWaffle 8.2.70 completed (commit 963d330493 by @mf0zz13) |
|
@gstraccini csharpier |
|
Running CSharpier on this branch! 🔧 |
|
✅ CSharpier result: |
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sonarcsharp (reported by Codacy) found more than 20 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.
|
✅ Build CrispyWaffle 8.2.71 completed (commit b577de148d by @guibranco) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
Src/CrispyWaffle.Redis/Cache/RedisCacheRepository.cs (4)
Line range hint
219-248: Consider removing theTask.Runwrapper.Since the
GetAsyncmethod of the cache client already returns aTask, there is no need to wrap it inside aTask.Run. You can directlyawaittheGetAsynccall.Apply this diff to remove the
Task.Runwrapper:-var returnResult = await Task.Run( - () => _cacheClient.Db0.GetAsync<T>(key, CommandFlags.PreferReplica).Result -); -return returnResult; +return await _cacheClient.Db0.GetAsync<T>(key, CommandFlags.PreferReplica);
Line range hint
258-290: Consider usingawaitinstead of accessing theResultproperty.To make the method fully asynchronous, consider using
awaitinstead of directly accessing theResultproperty of theTaskreturned byHashExistsAsyncandHashGetAsync.Apply this diff to use
await:-if ( - _cacheClient.Db0.HashExistsAsync(key, subKey, CommandFlags.PreferReplica).Result -) -{ - return Task.FromResult( - _cacheClient - .Db0.HashGetAsync<T>(key, subKey, CommandFlags.PreferReplica) - .Result - ); -} +if (await _cacheClient.Db0.HashExistsAsync(key, subKey, CommandFlags.PreferReplica)) +{ + return await _cacheClient.Db0.HashGetAsync<T>(key, subKey, CommandFlags.PreferReplica); +}
Line range hint
301-320: Consider checking the existence of the key before retrieving the value.To optimize the method, consider checking the existence of the key using
ExistsAsyncbefore trying to retrieve its value usingGetAsync. This way, you can avoid unnecessary retrieval attempts for non-existent keys.Apply this diff to check the existence before retrieving the value:
-value = _cacheClient.Db0.GetAsync<T>(key, CommandFlags.PreferReplica).Result; -return (_cacheClient.Db0.ExistsAsync(key).Result, value); +var exists = await _cacheClient.Db0.ExistsAsync(key); +if (exists) +{ + value = await _cacheClient.Db0.GetAsync<T>(key, CommandFlags.PreferReplica); +} +return (exists, value);
Line range hint
330-351: Consider checking the existence of the subkey before retrieving the value.Similar to the previous
TryGetAsyncmethod, consider checking the existence of the subkey usingHashExistsAsyncbefore trying to retrieve its value usingHashGetAsync. This way, you can avoid unnecessary retrieval attempts for non-existent subkeys.Apply this diff to check the existence before retrieving the value:
-value = _cacheClient - .Db0.HashGetAsync<T>(key, subKey, CommandFlags.PreferReplica) - .Result; -return (_cacheClient.Db0.HashExistsAsync(key, subKey).Result, value); +var exists = await _cacheClient.Db0.HashExistsAsync(key, subKey); +if (exists) +{ + value = await _cacheClient.Db0.HashGetAsync<T>(key, subKey, CommandFlags.PreferReplica); +} +return (exists, value);
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- Src/CrispyWaffle.CouchDB/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepository.cs (18 hunks)
- Src/CrispyWaffle.Redis/Cache/RedisCacheRepository.cs (12 hunks)
- Src/CrispyWaffle/Cache/CacheManager.cs (27 hunks)
- Tests/CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepositoryTests.cs (6 hunks)
- Tests/CrispyWaffle.Tests/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepositoryTests.cs (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- Tests/CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepositoryTests.cs
- Tests/CrispyWaffle.Tests/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepositoryTests.cs
Additional comments not posted (32)
Src/CrispyWaffle.Redis/Cache/RedisCacheRepository.cs (6)
Line range hint
160-183: LGTM!The changes to make the
Setmethod asynchronous usingasync/awaitandAddAsyncare implemented correctly. The exception handling logic is also preserved.
Line range hint
191-210: LGTM!The changes to make the
Setmethod with subkey asynchronous usingasync/awaitandHashSetAsyncare implemented correctly. The exception handling logic is also preserved.
Line range hint
357-373: LGTM!The changes to make the
Removemethod asynchronous usingasync/awaitandRemoveAsyncare implemented correctly. The exception handling logic is also preserved.
Line range hint
379-393: LGTM!The changes to make the
Removemethod with subkey asynchronous usingasync/awaitandHashDeleteAsyncare implemented correctly. The exception handling logic is also preserved.
Line range hint
401-419: LGTM!The changes to make the
TTLmethod asynchronous usingasync/awaitare implemented correctly. The exception handling logic is also preserved.
Line range hint
424-439: LGTM!The changes to make the
Clearmethod asynchronous usingasync/awaitandFlushDbAsyncare implemented correctly. The exception handling logic is also preserved.Src/CrispyWaffle.CouchDB/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepository.cs (11)
48-50: LGTM!The
ClearAsyncmethod is implemented correctly usingasyncandTask.Runto clear the cache asynchronously.
Line range hint
65-90: LGTM!The
ClearAsync<T>method is implemented correctly usingasyncandTask.Runto clear documents of a specific type asynchronously. It efficiently creates delete tasks for each document and waits for their completion. The exception handling is also properly implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag.
93-100: LGTM!The
GetAsync<T>(string key)method is implemented correctly. It checks if the typeTis assignable fromCouchDBCacheDocumentand retrieves the cached document usingGetSpecificAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>. The type cast is properly handled, and the default value is returned for non-assignable types.
118-125: LGTM!The
GetAsync<T>(string key, string subKey)method is implemented correctly. It checks if the typeTis assignable fromCouchDBCacheDocumentand retrieves the cached document usingGetSpecificAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>. The type cast is properly handled, and the default value is returned for non-assignable types.
Line range hint
135-162: LGTM!The
GetSpecificAsync<T>(string key)method is implemented correctly. It usesTask.Runto execute the database query asynchronously and handles document expiration by removing expired documents. The exception handling is properly implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag, and anInvalidOperationExceptionis thrown with a clear message if the item cannot be retrieved.
Line range hint
180-212: LGTM!The
GetSpecificAsync<T>(string key, string subKey)method is implemented correctly. It usesTask.Runto execute the database query asynchronously and handles document expiration by removing expired documents. The exception handling is properly implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag, and anInvalidOperationExceptionis thrown with a clear message if the item cannot be retrieved.
216-218: LGTM!The
RemoveAsync(string key)method is implemented correctly. It delegates the removal of the cached entry toRemoveSpecificAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>.
232-234: LGTM!The
RemoveAsync(string key, string subKey)method is implemented correctly. It delegates the removal of the cached entry toRemoveSpecificAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>.
Line range hint
242-263: LGTM!The
RemoveSpecificAsync<T>(string key)method is implemented correctly. It usesTask.Runto execute the database operations asynchronously. It retrieves the document by key and deletes it if it exists. The exception handling is properly implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag.
Line range hint
279-302: LGTM!The
RemoveSpecificAsync<T>(string key, string subKey)method is implemented correctly. It usesTask.Runto execute the database operations asynchronously. It retrieves the document by key and subkey and deletes it if it exists. The exception handling is properly implemented based on theShouldPropagateExceptionsflag.
306-313: LGTM!Src/CrispyWaffle/Cache/CacheManager.cs (15)
43-48: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto resolve the repository and add it to the list is the correct approach.
56-60: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto add the repository to the list is the correct approach.
68-76: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto resolve the repository and add it to the list is the correct approach.
Line range hint
84-104: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto run the logging statement asynchronously is the correct approach.
117-131: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto run the logging statement and set the value in each repository asynchronously is the correct approach.
140-159: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto run the logging statement and set the value in each repository asynchronously is the correct approach.
168-183: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto run the logging statement and set the value in each repository asynchronously is the correct approach.
193-213: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto run the logging statement, resolve the repository, and set the value in the repository asynchronously is the correct approach.
224-251: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto run the logging statement, resolve the repository, and set the value in the repository asynchronously is the correct approach.
262-289: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto run the logging statement, resolve the repository, and set the value in the repository asynchronously is the correct approach.
301-330: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto run the logging statement, resolve the repository, and set the value in the repository asynchronously is the correct approach.
Line range hint
339-370: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto run the logging statement, try to get the value from each repository, and set the value in the memory repository asynchronously is the correct approach.
Line range hint
381-419: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto run the logging statement, try to get the value from each repository, and set the value in the memory repository asynchronously is the correct approach.
429-448: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto run the logging statement, resolve the repository, and get the value from the repository asynchronously is the correct approach.
459-483: LGTM!The changes to make the method asynchronous look good. Using
awaitto run the logging statement and get the value from the repository asynchronously is the correct approach.
|
✅ Build CrispyWaffle 9.0.74 completed (commit c4cf85d18b by @guibranco) |
|
Rerunning 4 failed workflows on the commit |
|
Rerunning the following workflows:
|
|
@gstraccini csharpier |
|
Running CSharpier on this branch! 🔧 |
|
✅ CSharpier result: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
appveyor.yml (5)
Line range hint
23-35: Consider documenting CouchDB dependency.The installation of Apache CouchDB in the build process suggests it's a dependency for the project or tests. It would be beneficial to document this dependency in the project's README or documentation to ensure developers are aware of this requirement when setting up the project locally.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n
(new-lines)
Line range hint
37-50: Comprehensive setup with code quality tools.The before_build section now includes a robust setup with various code quality and coverage tools. This is a great improvement for maintaining code quality.
Consider pinning the versions of the installed tools (opencover.portable, codecov, etc.) to ensure reproducible builds. For example:
- cmd: choco install opencover.portable --version=X.X.X - cmd: choco install codecov --version=X.X.XReplace X.X.X with the desired versions.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n
(new-lines)
Line range hint
52-76: Comprehensive build script with thorough code analysis.The build script now includes a robust setup for SonarScanner and various code quality tools. This is excellent for maintaining high code quality standards.
To improve readability, consider extracting the SonarScanner parameters into a separate PowerShell function. For example:
function Get-SonarScannerParams { $Params = @( "/k:`"$env:SONAR_PROJECT`"", "/o:`"$env:SONAR_ORGANIZATION`"", "/v:`"$env:APPVEYOR_BUILD_NUMBER`"", "/d:sonar.host.url=`"https://sonarcloud.io`"", "/d:sonar.exclusions=`"**/bin/**/*,**/obj/**/*`"", "/d:sonar.coverage.exclusions=`"**/$env:SOLUTION_NAME.Tests/**,**/*Tests.cs`"", "/d:sonar.cs.opencover.reportsPaths=`"Tests\$env:SOLUTION_NAME.Tests\coverage.opencover.xml`"" ) if($env:LOCAL_PR -Eq 1) { $Params += "/d:sonar.token=`"$env:SONAR_TOKEN`"" } if(-Not $env:APPVEYOR_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER) { $Params += "/d:sonar.branch.name=`"$env:APPVEYOR_REPO_BRANCH`"" } if($env:APPVEYOR_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER) { $Params += "/d:sonar.pullrequest.key=$env:APPVEYOR_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER", "/d:sonar.pullrequest.branch=`"$env:APPVEYOR_REPO_BRANCH`"" } return $Params -join ' ' } $SonarParams = Get-SonarScannerParams Start-Process "dotnet" "sonarscanner begin $SonarParams"This would make the script more modular and easier to maintain.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n
(new-lines)
Line range hint
78-149: Comprehensive artifact generation and deployment configuration.The after_build and deploy sections are well-structured and cover all necessary aspects of artifact generation and deployment. This ensures that the build output is properly packaged and distributed.
To improve maintainability, consider extracting the list of projects and versions into variables at the beginning of the file. For example:
environment: VERSIONS: - netstandard2.0 - netstandard2.1 - net6.0 - net8.0 PROJECTS: - Configuration - ElasticSearch - Elmah - EventLog - I18n.PtBr - Log4Net - RabbitMQ - Redis - UtilsThen, you can use these variables in your PowerShell scripts:
$VERSIONS = $env:VERSIONS.Split(',') $PROJECTS = $env:PROJECTS.Split(',')This would make it easier to update the list of supported versions and projects in the future.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n
(new-lines)
Line range hint
1-149: Consider standardizing line endings.The static analysis tool yamllint reported an issue with line endings. It appears the file is using Windows-style line endings (CRLF) instead of Unix-style (LF). While this doesn't affect functionality, it's a good practice to use consistent line endings across all project files.
Consider converting the file to use LF line endings. You can do this with most modern text editors or use the following git command:
git config --global core.autocrlf input git rm --cached -r . git reset --hardThis will configure git to handle line endings correctly and reset the repository to use the correct line endings.
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n
(new-lines)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- appveyor.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
appveyor.yml
[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n
(new-lines)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
appveyor.yml (1)
1-4: Major version update detected.The version has been incremented from 8.2.{build} to 9.0.{build}, indicating a significant update. This change may have implications for semantic versioning and compatibility. Please ensure that this major version bump is intentional and aligns with the project's versioning strategy.
To verify the impact of this version change, please run the following script:
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 1-1: wrong new line character: expected \n
(new-lines)
|
✅ Build CrispyWaffle 9.0.141 completed (commit 5a4b7f3b4b by @guibranco) |
|
@gstraccini create labels |
|
Creating labels on this repository! 🏷️ |
|
✅ Build CrispyWaffle 9.0.150 completed (commit 54f5289edf by @guibranco) |
|
Creating labels on this repository! 🏷️ |
|
Creating 21 labels and updating 7 labels! 🏷️ |
|
@gstraccini create labels |
|
Creating labels on this repository! 🏷️ |
|
Creating 23 labels and updating 6 labels! 🏷️ |
|
@gstraccini csharpier |
|
Running CSharpier on this branch! 🔧 |
|
✅ CSharpier result: |
|
✅ Build CrispyWaffle 9.0.178 completed (commit 2736eac454 by @guibranco) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
Tests/CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepositoryTests.cs (6)
38-48: LGTM! Consider adding ConfigureAwait(false) for better performance.The conversion to async/await is correct and maintains the original test logic. Well done!
For slightly better performance in test scenarios, consider adding
ConfigureAwait(false)to each await call. For example:await _repository.SetAsync(doc, Guid.NewGuid().ToString()).ConfigureAwait(false);This can help avoid potential deadlocks in certain scenarios, although it's less critical in test code.
62-87: LGTM! Consider consistent formatting for method calls.The conversion to async/await is correct and maintains the original test logic. The multi-line formatting of the
SetSpecificAsynccall improves readability.For consistency, consider applying the same multi-line formatting to the second
SetSpecificAsynccall:await _repository.SetSpecificAsync( docTwo, Guid.NewGuid().ToString() );This would make the code style more uniform throughout the method.
100-110: LGTM! Consider usingis nullfor null check.The conversion to async/await is correct and maintains the original test logic.
For improved readability and to follow more modern C# conventions, consider using the
ispattern matching for the null check:Assert.True(docDB is null);This is more explicit and aligns with current C# best practices for null checking.
124-134: LGTM! Consider usingis nullfor consistency with previous suggestion.The conversion to async/await is correct and maintains the original test logic.
For consistency with the previous suggestion and to follow modern C# conventions, consider using the
ispattern matching for the null check:Assert.True(docDB is null);This change would make the null checks consistent across all test methods.
150-161: LGTM! Consider adding error handling for database operations.The conversion to async/await is correct and maintains the original test logic. The separation of
SetAsynccalls improves readability.Consider adding error handling to ensure the test fails gracefully if any of the database operations throw an exception. For example:
[Fact] public async Task DatabaseClearTestAsync() { try { await _repository.SetAsync(new CouchDBCacheDocument(), Guid.NewGuid().ToString()); await _repository.SetAsync(new CouchDBCacheDocument(), Guid.NewGuid().ToString()); await _repository.SetAsync(new CouchDBCacheDocument(), Guid.NewGuid().ToString()); await _repository.SetAsync(new CouchDBCacheDocument(), Guid.NewGuid().ToString()); await _repository.ClearAsync(); var count = await _repository.GetDocCountAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>(); Assert.True(count == 0); } catch (Exception ex) { Assert.Fail($"Database operation failed: {ex.Message}"); } }This will provide more informative test failures if there are issues with the database operations.
178-191: LGTM! Consider using a constant for the TTL value.The conversion to async/await is correct and maintains the original test logic. The use of
Task.Delay()is more appropriate for async methods.To improve the maintainability and readability of the test, consider introducing a constant for the TTL value:
private const int TTL_SECONDS = 5; private const int WAIT_SECONDS = 6; [Fact] public async Task TTLGetTestAsync() { var doc = new CouchDBCacheDocument() { Key = Guid.NewGuid().ToString() }; await _repository.SetAsync(new CouchDBCacheDocument(), doc.Key, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(TTL_SECONDS)); var fromDB = await _repository.GetAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>(doc.Key); Assert.True(doc.Key == fromDB.Key); await Task.Delay(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(WAIT_SECONDS)); fromDB = await _repository.GetAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>(doc.Key); Assert.True(fromDB is null); }This change makes the test more self-documenting and easier to modify if the TTL values need to be adjusted in the future.
Src/CrispyWaffle.CouchDB/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepository.cs (2)
Line range hint
332-345: Use method overloading instead of optional parametersSimilarly, in
SetSpecificAsync<T>(T value, string key, TimeSpan? ttl = null), consider replacing the optional parameter with method overloading. This approach can improve code readability and maintainability.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Sonarcsharp (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 332-332:
Use the overloading mechanism instead of the optional parameters.
450-453: RenameTTLAsynctoTtlAsyncto follow naming conventionsThe method
TTLAsyncshould be renamed toTtlAsyncto adhere to PascalCase naming conventions in C#. This change enhances code readability and maintains consistency throughout the codebase.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Sonarcsharp (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 450-450:
Rename method 'TTLAsync' to match pascal case naming rules, consider using 'TtlAsync'.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- Src/CrispyWaffle.CouchDB/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepository.cs (20 hunks)
- Tests/CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepositoryTests.cs (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Sonarcsharp (reported by Codacy)
Src/CrispyWaffle.CouchDB/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepository.cs
[warning] 41-41:
Refactor this method to use all type parameters in the parameter list to enable type inference.
[warning] 93-93:
Refactor this method to use all type parameters in the parameter list to enable type inference.
[warning] 118-118:
Refactor this method to use all type parameters in the parameter list to enable type inference.
[warning] 136-136:
Refactor this method to use all type parameters in the parameter list to enable type inference.
[warning] 179-179:
Refactor this method to use all type parameters in the parameter list to enable type inference.
[warning] 230-230:
Refactor this method to use all type parameters in the parameter list to enable type inference.
[warning] 267-267:
Refactor this method to use all type parameters in the parameter list to enable type inference.
[warning] 292-292:
Use the overloading mechanism instead of the optional parameters.
[warning] 332-332:
Use the overloading mechanism instead of the optional parameters.
[warning] 395-395:
Refactor this method to use all type parameters in the parameter list to enable type inference.
[warning] 423-423:
Refactor this method to use all type parameters in the parameter list to enable type inference.
[warning] 450-450:
Rename method 'TTLAsync' to match pascal case naming rules, consider using 'TtlAsync'.
[warning] 468-468:
Refactor this method to use all type parameters in the parameter list to enable type inference.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Tests/CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepositoryTests.cs (1)
Line range hint
1-231: Overall, excellent job on implementing asynchronous operations!The changes in this file successfully convert all test methods to use the async/await pattern, which aligns well with the PR objectives of enhancing the caching system with asynchronous capabilities. The test logic remains intact, ensuring that the functionality of the
CouchDBCacheRepositoryis still thoroughly validated.Key improvements:
- All repository method calls now use their async counterparts.
- Test methods have been renamed with the 'Async' suffix for clarity.
- The use of
Task.Delay()instead ofThread.Sleep()in the TTL test is more appropriate for async methods.These changes will help ensure that the asynchronous behavior of the cache repositories is correctly tested, potentially uncovering any issues related to concurrent operations or timing-dependent behavior.
| public async Task<int> GetDocCountAsync<T>() | ||
| where T : CouchDBCacheDocument | ||
| { | ||
| return ResolveDatabase<T>().Where(x => x.Id != null).ToList().Count; | ||
| return (await ResolveDatabaseAsync<T>()).Where(x => x.Id != null).ToList().Count; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor method to enable type inference for generic type parameter
The method GetDocCountAsync<T>() does not utilize the type parameter T in its parameters in a way that allows for type inference. This may require callers to explicitly specify the type parameter when invoking the method. Consider modifying the method to include T in the parameter list or refactor the method to eliminate the unnecessary generic type parameter.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Sonarcsharp (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 41-41:
Refactor this method to use all type parameters in the parameter list to enable type inference.
| public async Task<T> GetAsync<T>(string key) | ||
| { | ||
| if (!typeof(CouchDBCacheDocument).IsAssignableFrom(typeof(T))) | ||
| { | ||
| return default; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return (T)(object)GetSpecific<CouchDBCacheDocument>(key); | ||
| return (T)(object)await GetSpecificAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>(key); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor GetAsync<T> to enable type inference
The method GetAsync<T>(string key) may prevent type inference because the generic type parameter T is not used in a way that allows the compiler to infer it. This can necessitate explicit type declarations when calling the method. Consider adjusting the method signature or parameters to facilitate type inference.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Sonarcsharp (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 93-93:
Refactor this method to use all type parameters in the parameter list to enable type inference.
| public async Task SetAsync<T>(T value, string key, TimeSpan? ttl = null) | ||
| { | ||
| if (!typeof(CouchDBCacheDocument).IsAssignableFrom(typeof(T))) | ||
| { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| SetSpecific((CouchDBCacheDocument)(object)value, key, ttl); | ||
| await SetSpecificAsync((CouchDBCacheDocument)(object)value, key, ttl); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use method overloading instead of optional parameters
The method SetAsync<T>(T value, string key, TimeSpan? ttl = null) uses an optional parameter ttl. Utilizing method overloading instead of optional parameters can enhance clarity and reduce potential issues with default values. Consider creating overloaded methods to handle different scenarios.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Sonarcsharp (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 292-292:
Use the overloading mechanism instead of the optional parameters.
| var result = await GetAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>(key); | ||
| return result.TTL; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add null check to prevent potential NullReferenceException
In the TTLAsync method, if result is null, accessing result.TTL will throw a NullReferenceException. Add a null check to handle cases where the key does not exist.
Apply this change to handle the null case:
var result = await GetAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>(key);
if (result == null)
{
// Handle the null case appropriately
return TimeSpan.Zero; // or throw an exception if preferred
}
return result.TTL;| private async Task<CouchDatabase<T>> ResolveDatabaseAsync<T>(string dbName = default) | ||
| where T : CouchDBCacheDocument | ||
| { | ||
| if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(dbName)) | ||
| { | ||
| dbName = $"{typeof(T).Name.ToLowerInvariant()}s"; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return !_connector.CouchDBClient.GetDatabasesNamesAsync().Result.Contains(dbName) | ||
| ? _connector.CouchDBClient.CreateDatabaseAsync<T>().Result | ||
| return !(await _connector.CouchDBClient.GetDatabasesNamesAsync()).Contains(dbName) | ||
| ? (await _connector.CouchDBClient.CreateDatabaseAsync<T>()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor method to enable type inference for generic type parameter
The method ResolveDatabaseAsync<T>(string dbName = default) does not utilize the type parameter T in its parameters in a way that allows for type inference. This may require callers to explicitly specify the type parameter when invoking the method. Consider modifying the method signature to facilitate type inference.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Sonarcsharp (reported by Codacy)
[warning] 468-468:
Refactor this method to use all type parameters in the parameter list to enable type inference.
| @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ | |||
| tasks.Add(db.DeleteAsync(doc)); | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| Task.WaitAll(tasks.ToArray()); | |||
| await Task.Run(() => tasks.ToArray()); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use Task.WhenAll to await completion of all tasks
In the ClearAsync<T>() method, using await Task.Run(() => tasks.ToArray()); is not the optimal way to wait for multiple tasks to complete. Instead, use await Task.WhenAll(tasks); to efficiently await all tasks concurrently.
Apply this diff to correct the implementation:
- await Task.Run(() => tasks.ToArray());
+ await Task.WhenAll(tasks);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| await Task.Run(() => tasks.ToArray()); | |
| await Task.WhenAll(tasks); |
| { | ||
| if (!typeof(CouchDBCacheDocument).IsAssignableFrom(typeof(T))) | ||
| { | ||
| return default; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return (T)(object)GetSpecific<CouchDBCacheDocument>(key, subKey); | ||
| return (T)(object)await Task.FromResult(GetSpecificAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>(key, subKey)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Simplify redundant use of Task.FromResult
At line 125, await Task.FromResult(GetSpecificAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>(key, subKey)) introduces unnecessary wrapping of the task. Since GetSpecificAsync already returns a Task, you can await it directly without wrapping it in Task.FromResult.
Apply this diff to simplify the code:
- return (T)(object)await Task.FromResult(GetSpecificAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>(key, subKey));
+ return (T)(object)await GetSpecificAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>(key, subKey);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return (T)(object)await Task.FromResult(GetSpecificAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>(key, subKey)); | |
| return (T)(object)await GetSpecificAsync<CouchDBCacheDocument>(key, subKey); |
|
✅ Build CrispyWaffle 9.0.186 completed (commit 7d2bd13877 by @guibranco) |
|
✅ Build CrispyWaffle 9.0.235 completed (commit 06cdc891c9 by @guibranco) |
User description
Description
Resolves: Add async operations for CacheManager and ICacheRepository classes #88
Update the caching system to operate asynchronously. Methods were converted to async Task. Tests for caching were updated to work asynchronously.
Description
ICacheRepository,CouchDBCacheRepository,RedisCacheRepository, andMemoryCacheRepositoryhave been updated to async.Changes walkthrough 📝
CouchDBCacheRepository.cs
Refactor CouchDBCacheRepository for Asynchronous OperationsSrc/CrispyWaffle.CouchDB/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepository.cs
RedisCacheRepository.cs
Update RedisCacheRepository for Async SupportSrc/CrispyWaffle.Redis/Cache/RedisCacheRepository.cs
CacheManager.cs
Enhance CacheManager with Asynchronous MethodsSrc/CrispyWaffle/Cache/CacheManager.cs
ICacheRepository.cs
Update ICacheRepository for Asynchronous MethodsSrc/CrispyWaffle/Cache/ICacheRepository.cs
MemoryCacheRepository.cs
Enhance MemoryCacheRepository with Async MethodsSrc/CrispyWaffle/Cache/MemoryCacheRepository.cs
CouchDBCacheRepositoryTests.cs
Update CouchDBCacheRepository Tests for AsyncTests/CrispyWaffle.IntegrationTests/Cache/CouchDBCacheRepositoryTests.cs
CacheManagerTests.cs
Refactor CacheManager Tests for Asynchronous OperationsTests/CrispyWaffle.Tests/Cache/CacheManagerTests.cs
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests