Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Improve rpc_soak and channel_soak test to cover streaming #11687

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Improve rpc_soak and channel_soak test to cover streaming #11687

wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

zbilun
Copy link

@zbilun zbilun commented Nov 13, 2024

PTAL @apolcyn

  • The clientCompressedStreaming and serverCompressedStreaming cases are not included in this version of the PR but will be added if necessary.
  • In this design, the large_unary soak test case will continue to use the blocking API, while the streaming test cases will use the non-blocking API.
  • A new test type parameter has been introduced to the performSoakTest function.
  • Please review the POC code, and we can discuss the design further, thanks!

@zbilun
Add concurrency condition to the soak test using exisiting blocking api
fedbd64
@zbilun
Modify the influenced files
885e109
@zbilun
Address code review comments from Alex: improve soak test logic by us…
58e2ebd 
…ing soak_num_threads Flag
@zbilun
Address code review comments from Alex: modify totalFailures handling…
56883b5 
…, channel creation logic, and refactor thread body for performSoakTest
@zbilun
Removed useless file
7a9f3a9
@zbilun
Modify the channel implementation for rpc_soak test.
84dac62
@zbilun
Refactor soak test to use function callback for channel management an…
512ad84 
…d simplify thread result aggregation
@zbilun
Refactor performSoakTest and related functions to propagate Interrupt…
3d8c555 
…edException. Update the ThreadResults data type.
@zbilun
Improve rpc_soak and channel_soak test to cover streaming
fbba2b8
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@zbilun