Update content/04.results.md

Co-authored-by: Casey Greene <[email protected]>

content/04.results.md

@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ Furthermore, we recapitulate this finding when comparing against an additional b
 To identify possible disparities with respect to name origin, we again used the extracted names of quoted speakers from _Nature_ news articles and last authors of published papers in _Nature_.
 In addition, we also identified the last authors of all papers cited by a _Nature_ news article. 
 All processed names were then input into Wiki2019-LSTM and assigned one of ten possible name origins ([Methods]).
-In our analysis, we use name origin as an estimate for the perceived ethnicity of a primary source by a journalist.
+In our analysis, we use name origin to estimate the perceived ethnicity of a primary source by a journalist or fellow scientists who might recommend the individual as a source.
 Our prediction is not intended to assign ethnicity to an individual, but to be used broadly as a tool to quantify representational differences in a journalist's sociologically constructed perception of a primary source's ethnicity.
 Figure {@fig:fig3}a shows an overview of the process and example input data for this analysis: 1) quotes and quoted speakers (blue box), 2) names of cited first and last authors in news articles (green)  3) first and last authors' names of papers published by _Nature_ (dark orange box).
 We divided our analysis into three parts: firstly, quantifying the proportions of predicted name origins of first and last authors cited in _Nature_ news articles.