This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 11, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
Scale mutation queue with multiple shards #1048
Merged
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7173c8a
Add Shards to Queue
gdbelvin 5437f9b
Read Queue by shardID
gdbelvin fc8c64f
Write to multiple shards
gdbelvin 055ac62
HighWatermarks metadata proto
gdbelvin 39122ea
Read from multiple shards
gdbelvin 0748802
Create new shards during domain creation
gdbelvin 2b398b2
SQL independent randomShard
gdbelvin 6ebf36c
Use constant for repeated string
gdbelvin f6a17ed
Merge branch 'master' into f/retry/multi-queue
gdbelvin b48a1c1
Cleanup comments
gdbelvin 69e197c
Nits and improved error handling
gdbelvin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you at a point where you can't afford breaking compatibility by simply removing this field?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fortunately we're early enough that we're happy to break compatibility.
This PR is also introducing backwards-incompatible database schema changes as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that was my point. Why using
reserved 1
instead of just dropping / reassigning the tag to the new field?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good habits I suppose :-)