Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch scratch images for Habor Where possible #238

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
125 changes: 125 additions & 0 deletions proposals/switch-to-scratch-images.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
# Harbor Community Proposal - We should build all Harbor Images based Scratch

Status: In Progress
Created by: Vadim Bauer
Created time: February 07, 2024 1:17 PM
Last Edited: February 07, 2024 1:52 PM

# **Proposal: Scratch Images**

# **Abstract**

https://hub.docker.com/_/scratch/

This proposal advocates switching to use Scratch images for Harbor.
This approach reduces container size, enhances security, and optimizes resource
utilization.
It streamlines the deployment process, reducing image footprint and accelerating
application startup.
Utilizing Scratch images leads to a more agile development cycle and improved
scalability.

Using Scratch images aligns with Golang's philosophy of simplicity and
performance,
creating a streamlined and resource-efficient containerized environment for
Golang applications.

# **Background**

Today Harbor is using PhotonOS base images. On top of the base image that
already
comes with many unnecessary dependencies, we are installing addition tools that
increase the potential attack surface even further.

The consequence is that the project received regular vulnerability reports that
primary affect those dependencies.
Most of the older images don't receive vulnerability patches.

PhotonOS base image patching can be also delayed by weeks and months, making the
process unnecessary slow.

# **Proposal**

The proposal is replacing as many base images with scratch as possible.
Images where it would make sense can be migrated to distroless, or remain Photon
based.

# **Benefits for Harbor and the Ecosystem**

* Reduced Image sizes result in faster turnaround time while developing and
distributing software.
* Good for the environment; as less power, storge is used in transfer and
storage
* Attack surface of the core applications is drastically reduced.
* Less maintenance and patching
* Faster build for local development
* Easier to support Arm or any other infrastructure

# **Non-Goals**

Replace all images with distroless or scratch. While this would be definitely a
great achievement, the easier part would be to replace what is currently
possible.

## Rationale

Scratch is the most stripped down version of a Docker container.
Scratch contains nothing in it except for the executable binary which you add to
it.
It has no shell, nothing extra.

An Alternative To Scratch
A distroless image is not a single image to solve the problem, like scratch is.
Instead, distroless images are a class of minimal images which contain only your
application and the application’s runtime dependencies.

The static distroless image, gcr.io/distroless/static, is the simplest of all
the distroless images.
It contains a minimal Linux, glibc-based system with:

📝 ca-certificates
🔒 A /etc/passwd entry for a root user
🗑️ A /tmp directory
⌚ tzdata

Currently there are two major distroless streams google and Wolfi.
The second one has a commercial purpose only, and can't be used in the Open
Source Context

[A discussion of alternate approaches and the trade offs, advantages, and disadvantages of the specified approach.]

## Compatibility

Downsides of Scratch, is that they only work for compiled languages, and
debugging only works with a debug container or pod.
There are already many elaborated solutions

for [debugging container in Docker](https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/debug/)
and [Kubernetes](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/debug/debug-cluster/kubectl-node-debug/)

## Implementation

In the first phase, we would focus on the migration of the core application like
core, registry, exporter, jobservice, registryctl, trivy-adapter.

### Building from scratch: What does It mean?

“From scratch” means building an image with the “FROM scratch” reference in the
Dockerfile.
So, instead of using commonly used base images like Alpine or Ubuntu or
PhotonOS, in our case, we will reference Scratch.

This reference creates the smallest possible image, to be precise, it is empty,
containing no files or folders.

https://medium.com/@m0v_3r/building-container-images-from-scratch-with-the-scratch-base-image-8ff56812124b

## Open issues (if applicable)

As mentioned, the only open issue if scratch can be used only applies to:

* Nginx (portal)
* Postgres (db)
* Redis (cache)

In the given cases we can evaluate and test if
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like the sentence is not finished ?