Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📚 Doc: Clarify SendFile Docs #3172

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

xEricL
Copy link
Contributor

@xEricL xEricL commented Oct 19, 2024

Description

These changes include:

  • Adds fiber. to SendFile for the SendFile config parameter in the docs.
  • Clarifies that the ContentType header is set based on the format of the file if the file extension is missing/invalid.
  • Adds unit-tests to verify the ContentType header is set as described.
  • Makes the formatting of default values for SendFile struct fields consistent (matching the FS field and most middleware configs.
  • Adds missing hyphens for usage of case sensitive (Not related to Sendfile but I noticed it when I was refactoring).

Changes introduced

  • Documentation Update: Fix typos and clarify SendFile usage.

Type of change

  • Documentation update (changes to documentation)

Checklist

@xEricL xEricL requested a review from a team as a code owner October 19, 2024 20:44
@xEricL xEricL requested review from gaby, sixcolors, ReneWerner87 and efectn and removed request for a team October 19, 2024 20:44
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates primarily focused on improving documentation across several files in the fiber package. Modifications include clarifying comments in struct definitions, enhancing method documentation, and refining test cases to improve code coverage and error handling. Additionally, new methods and examples were introduced in the documentation to better illustrate functionality. Overall, these changes aim to enhance clarity and consistency without altering the underlying functionality of the code.

Changes

File Change Summary
app.go Updated comments for CaseSensitive and StrictRouting fields in the Config struct for clarity.
app_test.go Enhanced test cases including new tests for error handling, route naming, and added benchmark tests.
ctx.go Updated comments in SendFile struct and method for clarity on default values and Content-Type handling.
ctx_interface_gen.go Clarified documentation for SendFile method in the Ctx interface regarding compression and Content-Type.
docs/api/ctx.md Comprehensive updates to Ctx documentation including method signature changes, new method introduction, and example updates.
router.go Updated comments in Route struct and methods to clarify case sensitivity in parameter keys and path processing.

Possibly related PRs

  • 🔥Feature: Add support for TrustProxy #3170: The changes in this PR involve updates to the Config struct, including renaming fields and enhancing documentation, which is directly related to the modifications made to the Config struct in the main PR.

Suggested labels

📒 Documentation, 🧹 Updates

Suggested reviewers

  • sixcolors
  • gaby
  • efectn
  • ReneWerner87

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
Comments now shine, they never stop!
With clarity bright, and tests galore,
Fiber's framework, we all adore!
Documentation, a joyful dance,
Enhancing our code, giving it a chance! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.69%. Comparing base (9a72704) to head (727156a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3172      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.75%   82.69%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         114      114              
  Lines       11149    11149              
==========================================
- Hits         9226     9220       -6     
- Misses       1523     1527       +4     
- Partials      400      402       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 82.69% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
router.go (2)

55-55: Approved: Improved consistency in documentation

The change from "Case sensitive param keys" to "Case-sensitive param keys" improves the consistency and correctness of the documentation. This aligns well with the PR objectives of fixing typos and improving clarity.


319-319: Approved: Improved clarity and consistency in comment

The change from "in-case sensitive" to "in case-sensitive" improves the grammatical correctness and consistency of the comment. This aligns well with the PR objectives of improving clarity and fixing typos.

For even better clarity, consider rephrasing the comment as follows:

		// Create a stripped path for case-sensitive routing and trailing slash handling

This suggestion more explicitly states the purpose of the stripped path creation.

ctx.go (1)

1500-1503: Approved: Documentation improvements for SendFile method

The updates to the SendFile method's documentation are clear and helpful. They address the PR objectives by clarifying that:

  1. The file is not compressed by default.
  2. The Content-Type is set based on the file format.

These changes improve the clarity of the documentation and should help users better understand the behavior of the SendFile method.

Consider adding a brief example of how to enable compression, as this might be useful for users who want to use this feature. For instance:

// To enable compression:
err := c.SendFile(file, SendFile{Compress: true})
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 298975a and 6c4c2e0.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • app.go (1 hunks)
  • app_test.go (1 hunks)
  • ctx.go (2 hunks)
  • ctx_interface_gen.go (1 hunks)
  • docs/api/ctx.md (5 hunks)
  • router.go (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • app.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
router.go (1)

Line range hint 1-479: Overall assessment: Documentation improvements

The changes in this file are focused on improving the clarity and consistency of the documentation, specifically addressing the usage of hyphens and grammatical correctness. These modifications align well with the PR objectives of enhancing documentation quality.

No functional changes were made to the code, ensuring that the existing behavior remains unchanged. The improvements contribute to better readability and understanding of the Route struct and the register method.

ctx_interface_gen.go (1)

274-275: Excellent documentation improvements for SendFile method!

The changes to the SendFile method documentation are clear and beneficial:

  1. The addition of information about file compression default behavior and how to enable it provides valuable guidance to users.
  2. The clarification about the Content-Type header being set based on the file format rather than just the file extension is more accurate and informative.

These updates align well with the PR objectives and enhance the overall quality of the documentation.

docs/api/ctx.md (2)

Line range hint 1712-1750: LGTM! Documentation improvements for SendFile config.

The updates to the SendFile configuration struct documentation are clear and informative. The clarifications on default values for various fields (Compress, ByteRange, Download, CacheDuration, MaxAge) and the explanation of the Content-Type behavior enhance the overall understanding of the SendFile method.


Line range hint 1764-1814: LGTM! Helpful example added for SendFile usage.

The new example demonstrating how to disable compression when using SendFile is a valuable addition. It clearly shows how to use the SendFile configuration struct to customize the method's behavior.

app_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/api/ctx.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@gaby gaby added this to the v3 milestone Oct 19, 2024
Copy link
Member

@gaby gaby left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 LGTM

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit 579d9a3 into gofiber:main Oct 28, 2024
17 of 18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants