Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🩹 Fix: handle un-matched open brackets in the query params #3121

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 6, 2024

Conversation

dojutsu-user
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Add logic to keep count of open brackets. If there's a mismatch between the number of open and close brackets, then return error.

Fixes #3120

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Code consistency (non-breaking change which improves code reliability and robustness)

Checklist

Before you submit your pull request, please make sure you meet these requirements:

  • Followed the inspiration of the Express.js framework for new functionalities, making them similar in usage.
  • Conducted a self-review of the code and provided comments for complex or critical parts.
  • Updated the documentation in the /docs/ directory for Fiber's documentation.
  • Added or updated unit tests to validate the effectiveness of the changes or new features.
  • Ensured that new and existing unit tests pass locally with the changes.
  • Verified that any new dependencies are essential and have been agreed upon by the maintainers/community.
  • Aimed for optimal performance with minimal allocations in the new code.
  • Provided benchmarks for the new code to analyze and improve upon.

Commit formatting

Please use emojis in commit messages for an easy way to identify the purpose or intention of a commit. Check out the emoji cheatsheet here: CONTRIBUTING.md

Copy link

welcome bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Thanks for opening this pull request! 🎉 Please check out our contributing guidelines. If you need help or want to chat with us, join us on Discord https://gofiber.io/discord

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes made to the ctx.go and ctx_test.go files enhance the handling of square brackets in query parameters. The parseParamSquareBrackets function now includes improved logic for tracking unmatched brackets, ensuring that errors are returned for malformed input. Corresponding test cases have been added to validate these changes, specifically targeting scenarios with unmatched brackets to prevent panics and improve error handling.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
ctx.go Modified parseParamSquareBrackets to track unmatched brackets and return errors.
ctx_test.go Added test cases for QueryParser to validate error handling for unmatched brackets.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Panic on specific query param for QueryParser (#3120)

Poem

In the garden of code, I hop with delight,
Unmatched brackets now handled just right.
With tests to ensure all is well,
No more panics, all's swell!
A leap of joy, a twirl in the sun,
Parsing queries is now so much fun! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@dojutsu-user dojutsu-user marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2024 15:05
@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 linked an issue Sep 5, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
3 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
ctx.go (1)

Line range hint 1309-1338: Improve error handling and messages in parseParamSquareBrackets.

The function correctly implements the logic to handle unmatched brackets by using a counter. However, the error messages could be more descriptive. Consider including more context or the problematic part of the input in the error message to aid in debugging.

Additionally, ensure that all edge cases, such as strings ending with an unmatched bracket or strings with nested brackets, are handled correctly.

Consider enhancing the error messages with the following changes:

- return "", errors.New("unmatched brackets")
+ return "", fmt.Errorf("unmatched brackets in input: %s", k)

This change provides more context in the error message, making it easier to identify where the problem occurs in the input.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between bfcf91d and 540703f.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • ctx.go (2 hunks)
  • ctx_test.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (2)
ctx_test.go (2)

4511-4513: Check for unmatched brackets in query parameters.

The test case at lines 4511-4513 correctly checks for unmatched brackets in the query string, which is a good practice to ensure the robustness of the query parsing logic. This helps in preventing potential errors during runtime due to malformed query parameters.


4797-4799: Check for unmatched brackets in query parameters.

The test case at lines 4797-4799 correctly checks for unmatched brackets in the query string, which is a good practice to ensure the robustness of the query parsing logic. This helps in preventing potential errors during runtime due to malformed query parameters.

Comment on lines +4511 to +4513
c.Request().URI().SetQueryString("id=1&name[=tom")
q = new(Query)
utils.AssertEqual(t, "unmatched brackets", c.QueryParser(q).Error())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Duplicate test for unmatched brackets in query parameters.

The test cases at lines 4511-4513 and 4797-4799 are duplicates, testing the same functionality of checking for unmatched brackets in query parameters. Consider consolidating these tests or ensuring they cover different scenarios to avoid redundancy in the test suite.

Also applies to: 4797-4799

@ReneWerner87
Copy link
Member

we should have the same logic in the main branch for version 3, can you also make a pull request there

@ReneWerner87
Copy link
Member

image

@dojutsu-user
Copy link
Contributor Author

we should have the same logic in the main branch for version 3, can you also make a pull request there

Sure @ReneWerner87, will create a PR for v3.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
ctx.go (1)

Line range hint 1309-1338: Review the logic for handling unmatched brackets in parseParamSquareBrackets.

The function parseParamSquareBrackets has been updated to handle unmatched brackets more robustly by introducing a counter for open brackets. Here are a few observations and suggestions:

  1. Bracket Counting Logic: The use of openBracketsCount to track the number of unmatched open brackets is a good approach. It increments the count when an open bracket [ is found and decrements it when a close bracket ] is found. This helps in identifying unmatched brackets effectively.

  2. Error Handling: The function returns an error if openBracketsCount is negative (more closing than opening brackets) or if it's positive after processing all characters (more opening than closing brackets). This is crucial for preventing the processing of malformed queries that could lead to errors downstream.

  3. Improvement Suggestion: While the current implementation covers the basic cases of unmatched brackets, it might be beneficial to include more detailed error messages that could help in debugging. For example, indicating the position of the unmatched bracket could enhance the error's usefulness.

  4. Performance Consideration: The function iterates over each character in the input string, which is efficient given the need to check each character for brackets. However, if performance becomes a concern, especially with very long strings, consider benchmarks to evaluate if optimizations are necessary.

Overall, the changes enhance the robustness of query parameter parsing by preventing errors related to unmatched brackets. It's a valuable update given the potential impact of such errors on application stability.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 540703f and e489408.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • ctx.go (2 hunks)
  • ctx_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • ctx_test.go

@ReneWerner87 ReneWerner87 merged commit cb06bc5 into gofiber:v2 Sep 6, 2024
20 checks passed
Copy link

welcome bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉 We here at Fiber are proud of you! If you need help or want to chat with us, join us on Discord https://gofiber.io/discord

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

🐛 [Bug]: Panic on specific query param for QueryParser
2 participants