🩹 Fix: error check in Form binder

[devhaozi]

Description

Add missing error check in Form binder.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• Code consistency (non-breaking change which improves code reliability and robustness)

Checklist

Before you submit your pull request, please make sure you meet these requirements:

• Followed the inspiration of the Express.js framework for new functionalities, making them similar in usage.
• Conducted a self-review of the code and provided comments for complex or critical parts.
• Updated the documentation in the /docs/ directory for Fiber's documentation.
• Added or updated unit tests to validate the effectiveness of the changes or new features.
• Ensured that new and existing unit tests pass locally with the changes.
• Verified that any new dependencies are essential and have been agreed upon by the maintainers/community.
• Aimed for optimal performance with minimal allocations in the new code.
• Provided benchmarks for the new code to analyze and improve upon.

Commit formatting

Please use emojis in commit messages for an easy way to identify the purpose or intention of a commit. Check out the emoji cheatsheet here: CONTRIBUTING.md

[welcome]

Thanks for opening this pull request! 🎉 Please check out our contributing guidelines. If you need help or want to chat with us, join us on Discord https://gofiber.io/discord

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes enhance error handling in the Bind function of the formBinding struct in the binder/form.go file. An additional check for a non-nil error after certain operations ensures that any errors during the binding process are returned promptly to the caller, modifying the control flow accordingly.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
binder/form.go	Introduced an error handling mechanism in the Bind function to check for and return errors.

Poem

In the realm of code, where bunnies hop,
A check for errors makes our hearts stop!
With a nibble of logic, so neat and so fine,
Binding now glows with a sweet, clear sign.
Hoppity, hop, errors no longer hide,
In the garden of code, let’s take error in stride! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 260c5e5 and da72420.

Files selected for processing (1)

• binder/form.go (1 hunks)

Additional comments not posted (1)

binder/form.go (1)

43-45: Good addition of error handling.

The added error check ensures that any error encountered during the iteration over post arguments is returned immediately. This enhances the robustness of the function.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.82%. Comparing base (25e3992) to head (da72420).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
binder/form.go	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3110      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.77%   80.82%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         116      116              
  Lines        8850     8852       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         7149     7155       +6     
+ Misses       1302     1300       -2     
+ Partials      399      397       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	80.82% <0.00%> (+0.04%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[gaby]

@devhaozi The lines you added are not being covered by the tests as noted in the coverage report.

[devhaozi]

@devhaozi The lines you added are not being covered by the tests as noted in the coverage report.

The whole file is not tested, not only the lines I added, updated the description.

[ReneWerner87]

LGTM
we extend the tests in the next PR´s

[welcome]

Congrats on merging your first pull request! 🎉 We here at Fiber are proud of you! If you need help or want to chat with us, join us on Discord https://gofiber.io/discord