Tweak to lanfguse trace script

[evangriffiths]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the match_bets_with_langfuse_traces.py file, updating the start_time variable to change the timeframe for fetching resolved bets. It introduces a new conditional check to skip processing if bets_with_traces is empty, enhancing control flow. The logic for calculating simulated outcomes remains unchanged, and error handling for the get_outcome_for_trace function continues to manage exceptions appropriately. The output generation section is preserved, ensuring integration of the new logic within the existing framework.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
examples/monitor/match_bets_with_langfuse_traces.py	Updated start_time to utc_datetime(2024, 10, 1), added check for empty bets_with_traces, and preserved existing logic for outcomes and error handling.

Possibly related PRs

• Improve matching of langfuse traces with resolved bets. Add example #418: Enhances the matching of Langfuse traces with resolved bets, directly relating to this PR's changes.
• Remove timestamp check when matching bets with traces #421: Removes a timestamp check when matching bets with traces, relevant to the control flow improvements in this PR.
• Save more detailed bet details in strategy simulation script #429: Updates the get_outcome_for_trace function, introducing new strategies and modifying error handling, aligning with this PR's changes.
• Fix examples/monitor/match_bets_with_langfuse_traces.py #450: Fixes issues in the same script, including adjustments to output and handling of agent keys, relevant to this PR's modifications.
• Add o1 agents to bet simulation script #453: Adds new agent configurations and expands betting strategies, directly related to the changes in this PR.

Suggested reviewers

• kongzii

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[evangriffiths]

To quickly see if the script still works, I like to set start_time to 1 day ago. But then some agents have 0 bets, in which case the script will throw a divide-by-zero error. This fixes that.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

examples/monitor/match_bets_with_langfuse_traces.py (1)

210-212: LGTM! Consider enhancing the logging.

The empty check is a good addition to skip unnecessary processing. Consider adding a log message when skipping to make it more explicit in the output.

         if len(bets_with_traces) == 0:
+            print(f"Skipping {agent_name}: No bets with traces found.")
             continue

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 50b9f78 and edc6840.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• examples/monitor/match_bets_with_langfuse_traces.py (2 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

examples/monitor/match_bets_with_langfuse_traces.py (1)

173-173: ⚠️ Potential issue

Verify the start time configuration.

The start time is set to a future date (October 2024), which may cause issues as it's beyond the current date (November 2024). Additionally, please verify that October 1st, 2024 is an appropriate date that satisfies the "after pool token number is stored" requirement mentioned in the comment.

Consider updating to a past date or implementing a dynamic date calculation relative to the current time:

-        start_time = utc_datetime(2024, 10, 1)
+        start_time = utc_datetime(2023, 10, 1)  # Assuming you meant 2023
# Or use a dynamic approach:
+        from datetime import datetime, timedelta
+        start_time = datetime.utcnow() - timedelta(days=30)  # Last 30 days