Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update checking-for-existing-gpg-keys.md #35597

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hemashushu
Copy link

Add a workaround for the “No valid identities found in this GPG data” error.

Why:

Users may encounter “No valid identities found in this GPG data” error when importing larger GPG public keys. This is because some users have been using GPG for a long time and the public key contains more signature information. The original documentation does not indicate why this error is encountered and does not provide a workaround.

What's being changed (if available, include any code snippets, screenshots, or gifs):

The following paragraph was added:

If you encounter "No valid identities found in this GPG data" error, it may be because the public key you exported is too large or contains useless information, please add GPG option --export-options export-minimal to export again, e.g.: $ gpg --armor --export-options export-minimal --export 3AA5C34371567BD2

Add a workaround for the “No valid identities found in this GPG data” error.
Copy link

welcome bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Thanks for opening this pull request! A GitHub docs team member should be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, please check out the contributing guidelines.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team label Dec 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Automatically generated comment ℹ️

This comment is automatically generated and will be overwritten every time changes are committed to this branch.

The table contains an overview of files in the content directory that have been changed in this pull request. It's provided to make it easy to review your changes on the staging site. Please note that changes to the data directory will not show up in this table.


Content directory changes

You may find it useful to copy this table into the pull request summary. There you can edit it to share links to important articles or changes and to give a high-level overview of how the changes in your pull request support the overall goals of the pull request.

Source Preview Production What Changed
authentication/managing-commit-signature-verification/checking-for-existing-gpg-keys.md fpt
ghec
ghes@ 3.15 3.14 3.13 3.12 3.11 3.10
fpt
ghec
ghes@ 3.15 3.14 3.13 3.12 3.11 3.10

fpt: Free, Pro, Team
ghec: GitHub Enterprise Cloud
ghes: GitHub Enterprise Server

@nguyenalex836 nguyenalex836 added content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team waiting for review Issue/PR is waiting for a writer's review authentication Content relating to authentication and removed triage Do not begin working on this issue until triaged by the team labels Dec 10, 2024
@nguyenalex836
Copy link
Contributor

@hemashushu Thanks so much for opening a PR! I'll get this triaged for review ✨

@hemashushu
Copy link
Author

I am providing two public key files for testing:
hippospark.public.zip
one is the original public key, which causes import errors, and the other is the public key after a "gpg clean" operation.
They are both valid public keys and can be verified using the gpg command:

$ gpg --import --import-options show-only hippospark.public.asc 
pub   rsa2048 2013-04-15 [SC] [expires: 2050-03-27]
      AC1F548ADA01B4770A7C5B0E240CA6A5BDAF9022
sub   rsa2048 2013-04-15 [E] [expires: 2050-03-27]
sub   rsa2048 2013-05-14 [S] [expires: 2050-03-27]

@subatoi subatoi added the needs SME This proposal needs review from a subject matter expert label Dec 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for opening a pull request! We've triaged this issue for technical review by a subject matter expert 👀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
authentication Content relating to authentication content This issue or pull request belongs to the Docs Content team needs SME This proposal needs review from a subject matter expert waiting for review Issue/PR is waiting for a writer's review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants