Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: convert project to esm module #15

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2023
Merged

Conversation

gitcommitshow
Copy link
Owner

@gitcommitshow gitcommitshow commented Dec 11, 2023

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated README.md to reflect new import syntax and improved code snippet formatting for better readability.
  • Refactor

    • Transitioned the codebase to ES6 module syntax, replacing require with import and exports with export.
  • Tests

    • Updated test files to use ES6 import statements for consistency with the refactored codebase.
  • Chores

    • Modified GitHub Actions workflow to support Node.js version 16.x, dropping version 14.x.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2023

Walkthrough

The project has transitioned from CommonJS to ES6 module syntax, affecting how modules import and export functions. Node.js version support in the CI workflow has been updated, and the README.md now reflects the new import style and improved code readability.

Changes

File(s) Summary
.github/workflows/test.yml Updated Node.js versions in CI workflow.
README.md, cli.js, contributors.js, index.js, network.js, test/... Transitioned from require to import syntax and updated export style to ES6.

🐇✨
In the code garden, changes bloom,
ES6 sprouts, giving modules room.
From require to import, we hop,
With cleaner syntax, our code won't flop. 🌱🚀

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X ?


Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • If you reply to a review comment from CodeRabbit, the bot will automatically respond.
  • To engage with CodeRabbit bot directly around the specific lines of code in the PR, mention @coderabbitai in your review comment
  • Note: Review comments are made on code diffs or files, not on the PR overview.
  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Note: For conversation with the bot, please use the review comments on code diffs or files.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

@gitcommitshow gitcommitshow merged commit cac0676 into main Dec 11, 2023
3 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 3

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5397704 and 94fe394.
Files ignored due to filter (1)
  • package.json
Files selected for processing (9)
  • .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • cli.js (1 hunks)
  • contributors.js (6 hunks)
  • index.js (2 hunks)
  • network.js (2 hunks)
  • test/contributors.test.js (1 hunks)
  • test/fixtures/contributors.fixture.js (1 hunks)
  • test/index.test.js (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • contributors.js
  • test/fixtures/contributors.fixture.js
Additional comments: 13
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
  • 17-23: The update to the Node.js versions in the testing matrix is correct and aligns with the PR's objective to modernize the project's infrastructure. The versions 16.x, 18.x, and 20.x are appropriate choices as they are either LTS or current versions as of the last known release schedule.
README.md (2)
  • 4-4: The clickable badge for the GitHub Actions workflow is a good enhancement for better user experience.

  • 42-48: The updated import syntax and function call structure in the code snippet align with the ES6 module standards and improve readability.

cli.js (1)
  • 3-3: The import statement correctly replaces the CommonJS require syntax with ES6 import syntax, aligning with the PR's objective to refactor the project to use ES modules.
index.js (4)
  • 1-1: The import statement correctly uses ES6 syntax to import all exports from contributors.js as contributorsLib.

  • 18-18: The OCK object is correctly exported as the default export using ES6 syntax.

  • 15-18: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [3-17]

The OCK object structure and the reference to archiveContributorsLeaderboard from contributorsLib are maintained and correctly implemented.

  • 1-4: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-18]

Verify that all references to OCK throughout the codebase are updated to accommodate the change from named exports to default export.


The shell script intended to verify the usage of OCK across the codebase failed due to a syntax error. I will correct the script and re-run the verification process.

#!/bin/bash
# Search for files that import `OCK` from `index.js` using the old CommonJS syntax. Expecting no results.
rg "const { OCK } = require\\('./index.js'\\)"
# Search for files that import `OCK` from `index.js` using the new ES6 default import syntax. Expecting list of all locations that use this import.
rg "import OCK from './index.js'"
network.js (1)
  • 21-27: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-27]

The refactoring of makeRequest to an async function and the use of ES6 export syntax is consistent with the PR's objective to modernize the module system. Ensure that all parts of the codebase that use makeRequest are updated to handle the new Promise-based async function correctly.


The verification of the makeRequest function's usage in the codebase shows that it is being used correctly as an async function in contributors.js. The calls to makeRequest are awaited, which is consistent with its new async signature.

Final review comment:

The refactoring of makeRequest to an async function and the use of ES6 export syntax has been verified. The usage in contributors.js correctly handles the new Promise-based async function. No further action is required.

test/contributors.test.js (2)
  • 1-4: The import statements have been correctly updated to ES6 syntax.

  • 6-6: The tests are currently being skipped. Confirm if this is intentional or if the .skip should be removed before merging.

test/index.test.js (2)
  • 1-5: The changes to the import statements correctly reflect the transition from CommonJS to ES6 modules, aligning with the PR's objective.

  • 18-18: Verify that the fixture file contributors.fixture.js has been updated to include the ALL_REPO_CONTRIBUTOR_COUNT_MIN variable and that the logic of the test remains correct with this change.


The fixture file contributors.fixture.js includes the ALL_REPO_CONTRIBUTOR_COUNT_MIN variable, confirming that the necessary update has been made to align with the changes in the test/index.test.js file. The logic of the test should remain correct with this change.

Comment on lines 1 to 6
#!/usr/bin/env node

const OCK = require('./index').OCK;
import OCK from './index.js';

let mainCommand = process.argv[1];
console.log("Running "+mainCommand+"...");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [5-12]

Consider adding validation for command line arguments to ensure that REPO_OWNER and GITHUB_PERSONAL_TOKEN are provided and valid before they are used. This can prevent runtime errors and improve the user experience by providing clear error messages when necessary arguments are missing or incorrect.


Note: This review was outside the patches, and no patch overlapping with it was found. Original lines [12-12]

Consider adding error handling around the OCK.contributors.github.archive function call to manage exceptions or promise rejections. This could include a try-catch block or chaining a .catch() if the function returns a promise.

Comment on lines +24 to 27
export async function makeRequest(method, url, options) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
// Ensure options is an object and set the method
options = typeof options === 'object' ? options : {};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mutating the input parameter options directly can lead to unexpected side effects. Consider creating a new object that extends the provided options to avoid potential issues with objects passed by reference.

- options = typeof options === 'object' ? options : {};
- options.method = method;
+ const requestOptions = { ...options, method };

Committable suggestion

IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
export async function makeRequest(method, url, options) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
// Ensure options is an object and set the method
options = typeof options === 'object' ? options : {};
export async function makeRequest(method, url, options) {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
// Ensure options is an object and set the method
const requestOptions = { ...options, method };

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant