-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: convert project to esm module #15
Conversation
WalkthroughThe project has transitioned from CommonJS to ES6 module syntax, affecting how modules import and export functions. Node.js version support in the CI workflow has been updated, and the README.md now reflects the new import style and improved code readability. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X ? TipsChat with CodeRabbit Bot (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to filter (1)
- package.json
Files selected for processing (9)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (2 hunks)
- cli.js (1 hunks)
- contributors.js (6 hunks)
- index.js (2 hunks)
- network.js (2 hunks)
- test/contributors.test.js (1 hunks)
- test/fixtures/contributors.fixture.js (1 hunks)
- test/index.test.js (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- contributors.js
- test/fixtures/contributors.fixture.js
Additional comments: 13
.github/workflows/test.yml (1)
- 17-23: The update to the Node.js versions in the testing matrix is correct and aligns with the PR's objective to modernize the project's infrastructure. The versions 16.x, 18.x, and 20.x are appropriate choices as they are either LTS or current versions as of the last known release schedule.
README.md (2)
4-4: The clickable badge for the GitHub Actions workflow is a good enhancement for better user experience.
42-48: The updated import syntax and function call structure in the code snippet align with the ES6 module standards and improve readability.
cli.js (1)
- 3-3: The import statement correctly replaces the CommonJS
require
syntax with ES6import
syntax, aligning with the PR's objective to refactor the project to use ES modules.index.js (4)
1-1: The import statement correctly uses ES6 syntax to import all exports from
contributors.js
ascontributorsLib
.18-18: The
OCK
object is correctly exported as the default export using ES6 syntax.15-18: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [3-17]
The
OCK
object structure and the reference toarchiveContributorsLeaderboard
fromcontributorsLib
are maintained and correctly implemented.
- 1-4: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-18]
Verify that all references to
OCK
throughout the codebase are updated to accommodate the change from named exports to default export.
The shell script intended to verify the usage of
OCK
across the codebase failed due to a syntax error. I will correct the script and re-run the verification process.#!/bin/bash # Search for files that import `OCK` from `index.js` using the old CommonJS syntax. Expecting no results. rg "const { OCK } = require\\('./index.js'\\)" # Search for files that import `OCK` from `index.js` using the new ES6 default import syntax. Expecting list of all locations that use this import. rg "import OCK from './index.js'"network.js (1)
- 21-27: > Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-27]
The refactoring of
makeRequest
to an async function and the use of ES6 export syntax is consistent with the PR's objective to modernize the module system. Ensure that all parts of the codebase that usemakeRequest
are updated to handle the new Promise-based async function correctly.
The verification of the
makeRequest
function's usage in the codebase shows that it is being used correctly as an async function incontributors.js
. The calls tomakeRequest
are awaited, which is consistent with its new async signature.Final review comment:
The refactoring of
makeRequest
to an async function and the use of ES6 export syntax has been verified. The usage incontributors.js
correctly handles the new Promise-based async function. No further action is required.test/contributors.test.js (2)
1-4: The import statements have been correctly updated to ES6 syntax.
6-6: The tests are currently being skipped. Confirm if this is intentional or if the
.skip
should be removed before merging.test/index.test.js (2)
1-5: The changes to the import statements correctly reflect the transition from CommonJS to ES6 modules, aligning with the PR's objective.
18-18: Verify that the fixture file
contributors.fixture.js
has been updated to include theALL_REPO_CONTRIBUTOR_COUNT_MIN
variable and that the logic of the test remains correct with this change.
The fixture file
contributors.fixture.js
includes theALL_REPO_CONTRIBUTOR_COUNT_MIN
variable, confirming that the necessary update has been made to align with the changes in thetest/index.test.js
file. The logic of the test should remain correct with this change.
#!/usr/bin/env node | ||
|
||
const OCK = require('./index').OCK; | ||
import OCK from './index.js'; | ||
|
||
let mainCommand = process.argv[1]; | ||
console.log("Running "+mainCommand+"..."); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note: This review was outside the patches, so it was mapped to the patch with the greatest overlap. Original lines [5-12]
Consider adding validation for command line arguments to ensure that REPO_OWNER
and GITHUB_PERSONAL_TOKEN
are provided and valid before they are used. This can prevent runtime errors and improve the user experience by providing clear error messages when necessary arguments are missing or incorrect.
Note: This review was outside the patches, and no patch overlapping with it was found. Original lines [12-12]
Consider adding error handling around the OCK.contributors.github.archive
function call to manage exceptions or promise rejections. This could include a try-catch block or chaining a .catch()
if the function returns a promise.
export async function makeRequest(method, url, options) { | ||
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { | ||
// Ensure options is an object and set the method | ||
options = typeof options === 'object' ? options : {}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mutating the input parameter options
directly can lead to unexpected side effects. Consider creating a new object that extends the provided options
to avoid potential issues with objects passed by reference.
- options = typeof options === 'object' ? options : {};
- options.method = method;
+ const requestOptions = { ...options, method };
Committable suggestion
❗ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
export async function makeRequest(method, url, options) { | |
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { | |
// Ensure options is an object and set the method | |
options = typeof options === 'object' ? options : {}; | |
export async function makeRequest(method, url, options) { | |
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => { | |
// Ensure options is an object and set the method | |
const requestOptions = { ...options, method }; |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Refactor
require
withimport
andexports
withexport
.Tests
Chores