Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SPARQL queries #3

Open
wants to merge 52 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

SPARQL queries #3

wants to merge 52 commits into from

Conversation

giacomodecolle
Copy link
Owner

Added first level 3 query

@giacomodecolle giacomodecolle changed the title Create aristotelian_definition_level3.sparql SPARQL queries Oct 3, 2024
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
# checking whether all GDCs are generically depending on something

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems to me that your queries are much more complex than mine and the others I have reviewed, we may have to see how to adjust the complexity levels.
I have left comments where protege gives me an error in the execution.
The only thing I would consider is whether to add a short description of the functionality to each one (at least it seemed to me that the assignment required title + description)

projects/project-2/assignment/OBO.sparql Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
projects/project-2/assignment/inverse_property_lev4.sparql Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
projects/project-2/assignment/no_subclass_lv0.sparql Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
projects/project-2/assignment/realizations_lv6.sparql Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are you checking if some subclasses of ICE are related to some subclass of IBE and subclasses of IQE within CCO? we do not need to have that closure, like saying that a email ICE must depend on some other entity we can find in CCO.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good for seeing that some parts of CCO lack in documentation and human readability. If you changed the last string filter with some regex instead of "cco:" this could be applied to any ontology, and the difficult level would be maybe 3.5.

projects/project-2/assignment/GDC_lv6.sparql Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants