-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SPARQL queries #3
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ | |||
# checking whether all GDCs are generically depending on something |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems to me that your queries are much more complex than mine and the others I have reviewed, we may have to see how to adjust the complexity levels.
I have left comments where protege gives me an error in the execution.
The only thing I would consider is whether to add a short description of the functionality to each one (at least it seemed to me that the assignment required title + description)
projects/project-2/assignment/aristotelian_definition_level3.sparql
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
projects/project-2/assignment/second_process_boundary_lv4.sparql
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
are you checking if some subclasses of ICE are related to some subclass of IBE and subclasses of IQE within CCO? we do not need to have that closure, like saying that a email ICE must depend on some other entity we can find in CCO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good for seeing that some parts of CCO lack in documentation and human readability. If you changed the last string filter with some regex instead of "cco:" this could be applied to any ontology, and the difficult level would be maybe 3.5.
Added first level 3 query