Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
more details added to proof
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
MareoRaft committed Jan 3, 2018
1 parent 5c2033a commit 5ecfec2
Showing 1 changed file with 12 additions and 8 deletions.
20 changes: 12 additions & 8 deletions Complex Analysis/complex-analysis-notes.tex
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
\newcommand{\D}{\mathbb{D}}
\renewcommand{\Re}{\operatorname{Re}}
\renewcommand{\Im}{\operatorname{Im}}
\newcommand{\Cc}{\C^*}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BEGIN CONTENT: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\title[Complex Analysis]{Complex Analysis}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1489,18 +1490,21 @@ \section{(10/6/2016) Lecture 13}
\begin{prop}
All meromorphic functions on $\C^*$ are rational functions.
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}[Idea of proof]
First, there are only finitely many poles, otherwise they ware not
isolated because they would accumulate.
\begin{proof}
First, we claim there are only finitely many poles. Suppose not. Since $\Cc$ is compact, there would be an accumulation point of poles, causing a non-isolated singularity. But meromorphic functions only have isolated singularities by definition, hence the claim is true.

Second, let $\{z_1, \ldots, z_j\}$ be the poles in $\C$. Let
$p_j(z)$ be the principal part at $z_j$ and $p_\infty(z)$ be the
principal part at $\infty$. Then $f - (p_\infty + \sum p_j)$ is an
entire function that extends to be 0 at $\infty$.
$p_j(z)$ be the singular part at $z_j$ and $p_\infty(z)$ be the
singular part at $\infty$. I claim that $f - (p_\infty + \sum p_j)$ is an
entire function.

We know that $f$ and the $p$ functions are analytic away from the poles. We need only show $f - (p_\infty + \sum p_j)$ is analytic at the poles. At each pole, we consider $f$ written in its L. series centered at $z_j$. But thanks to subtracting off $p_j$, the singular part is now gone. The other $p$ functions do not interfere because they do not have poles at $z_j$. We conclude that $f - (p_\infty + \sum p_j)$ has no pole at $z_j$, and this is true for every $j$ and for $\oo$ too. So the claim is true.

We claim that $f - (p_\infty + \sum p_j)$ extends to 0 at $\oo$. Consider $f$ written in its L. series centered at $\oo$. Now take the limit of $f - (p_\infty + \sum p_j)$ as $z$ approaches $\oo$. $f$ and $p_\oo$ cancel each other (needs more justification). All other $p_j$ go to 0. So the claim is true.

Third, it is bounded. So,
Now $f - (p_\infty + \sum p_j)$ is bounded because it is bounded on a neighborhood of $\oo$ and the remaining domain is itself bounded, so that the continuity of $f - (p_\infty + \sum p_j)$ bounded.

fourth, by Liouville, it is zero. Thus, $p_\infty + \sum p_j$ is rational.
Finally, by Liouville, $f - (p_\infty + \sum p_j)$ is constant, and that constant must be 0. We conclude that $f =p_\infty + \sum p_j$, which is rational.
\end{proof}
Writing $f = p_\infty + \sum p_j$ is the partial fraction
decomposition of $f$.
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 5ecfec2

Please sign in to comment.