Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency geostyler-wfs-parser to v2.0.1 #148

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 31, 2024

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
geostyler-wfs-parser 2.0.0 -> 2.0.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

geostyler/geostyler-wfs-parser (geostyler-wfs-parser)

v2.0.1: Version 2.0.1

Compare Source

BugFixes

  • fixes issue with DescribeFeatureType request for layers without attributes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/geostyler-wfs-parser-2.x branch from afd14be to 3b8cea8 Compare June 4, 2024 07:10
@KaiVolland KaiVolland merged commit abf2363 into main Jun 4, 2024
2 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/geostyler-wfs-parser-2.x branch June 4, 2024 07:12
@jansule
Copy link

jansule commented Jun 4, 2024

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.3.2 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants