feat(#355): add support of CIP-57 #356
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ce data instances
sourabhxyz
commented
Oct 4, 2024
| @@ -13,13 +13,25 @@ module GeniusYield.Types.Script.ScriptHash ( | |||
| scriptHashFromLedger, | |||
| apiHashToPlutus, | |||
| scriptHashToPlutus, | |||
| GYValidatorHash, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These are just ported over from GeniusYield.Types.Script module.
sourabhxyz
changed the title
brunjlar
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #355.
Also since post CIP-69 we have unified script signature, I have made
GYValidator, etc. just a synonym forGYScript. This is non-breaking as constructor for types such asGYValidatorwere never exposed and now with them being just a type synonym, functions which were earlier expectingGYValidatorcan also acceptGYScript.To see how everything fits together, look at an e2e example written under privnet tests.