docs: release template #182
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on modifications to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
github-actions
bot
added
docs
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/release-drafter.yml (1)
4-6: Consider generalizing the donation badge text.The badges are well-formatted and appropriately placed. However, the "Buy me an Omer" text in the donation badge might be too specific. Consider using the more conventional "Buy me a coffee" text to maintain consistency with the platform's branding.
- [](https://www.buymeacoffee.com/geertmeersman) + [](https://www.buymeacoffee.com/geertmeersman)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/release-drafter.yml(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/release-drafter.yml (1)
60-60: Verify removal of autolabeler configuration.
The AI summary indicates that the autolabeler section was removed. While this won't break the release drafter functionality, it might impact the automated labeling of PRs. Please confirm if this removal was intentional and if there's an alternative labeling strategy in place.
✅ Verification successful
Removal of autolabeler is compensated by dedicated PR labeling workflow
The removal of the autolabeler section from release-drafter.yml is intentional and well-compensated. The repository has a dedicated workflow in .github/workflows/pr-checker.yml that handles PR labeling through a more sophisticated approach:
- It uses a custom Python script (
.github/scripts/pr_extract_labels.py) to determine SemVer labels - Automatically assigns labels using GitHub Actions
- Includes validation to ensure proper SemVer labels (major/minor/patch) are present
This represents an improvement over the previous regex-based autolabeling, moving towards a more maintainable and controlled labeling strategy.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any other files that might handle PR labeling
echo "Checking for alternative PR labeling configurations..."
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ -x grep -l "pull_request" {}
Length of output: 377
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of workflow files for PR labeling configurations
echo "Checking PR labeling configurations in workflow files..."
for file in .github/workflows/validate.yml .github/workflows/dependency-review.yml .github/workflows/pr-checker.yml .github/workflows/lint.yml .github/workflows/codeql.yml .github/workflows/bandit.yml; do
echo "=== $file ==="
grep -A 5 -B 5 "label" "$file" || true
done
# Check if there was a previous version of release-drafter.yml
echo -e "\nChecking previous version of release-drafter.yml..."
git show HEAD^:.github/release-drafter.yml || true
Length of output: 5903
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes