Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix system and type #81

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

warrenronsiek
Copy link

Note that I removed "Coloardo Superior Court", because AFAIKT, it doesn't exist. Neither Google or GPT4 show any record of this existing.

@mlissner
Copy link
Member

mlissner commented Oct 4, 2023

@flooie, sending this your way.

@flooie
Copy link
Collaborator

flooie commented Oct 4, 2023

Thanks @mlissner

@warrenronsiek - Im not sure I agree with your assessment about the superior courts but I think there may be confusion because there were courts called the Superior Court in and for the County of Denver in the 1800s.

While I am not sure about whether their were more than Denver, The assumption I make its that there probably were and so Colorado Superior Court is a "parent court" for the Denver superior court.

Sometimes it's In the Superior Court of Denver, sometimes it's in and for the county of Denver.
See excerpt below
Screenshot 2023-10-04 at 6 14 10 PM

Comment on lines +18885 to +18891
"notes": "Need more information about this court. GPT4/Google do not recognize it.",
"regex": [
"New Jersey Special Statutory Court",
"New Jersey Special Statutory Tribunal"
],
"system": "state",
"type": ""
"type": null
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately, we are often basing the courts on actual courts we see in books. but that there aren't long historical records for.

@@ -48458,10 +48454,10 @@
"level": "",
"location": "Utah",
"name": "Salt Lake City Register and Receiver",
"notes": "Pre-Statehood Court: No information yet found",
"notes": "Register/Receiver terms are historically associated with the management of public lands in the United States, particularly in the context of the General Land Office (GLO) during western expansion. May have served quasi-judicial role in certain circumstances, but its not a court.",
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now this is the kind of comment I get up in the morning for.

@flooie
Copy link
Collaborator

flooie commented Oct 4, 2023

@warrenronsiek these are great thank you so much for the work you put into this. I think I have a few small quibbles with some of it - but Im happy to discuss outlier cases

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🆕 New
Status: General Backlog
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants