feat(scrapers.update_from_text): new command #4520
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Helps solve: freelawproject/juriscraper#858 - New command to re-run Site.extract_from_text over downloaded opinions - Able to filter by Docket.court_id , OpinionCluster.date_filed, OpinionCluster.precedential_status - Updates tasks.update_from_document_text to return information for logging purposes - Updates test_opinion_scraper to get a Site.extract_from_text method
🔍 Existing Issues For ReviewYour pull request is modifying functions with the following pre-existing issues: 📄 File: cl/scrapers/tasks.py
Did you find this useful? React with a 👍 or 👎 |
flooie
reviewed
Oct 3, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Oct 18, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Oct 19, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Oct 19, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Oct 19, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Oct 19, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Oct 19, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Oct 19, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Oct 19, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Oct 19, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Oct 20, 2024
grossir
force-pushed
the
scrapers_update_from_text_command
branch
4 times, most recently
from
2838202
to
6a1fadb
Compare
- validate citation objects from `Site.extract_from_text`. Add tests for this - abstract --courts required argument for scrapers into ScraperCommand class also, made it more flexible - refactor cl_scrape_opinions; cl_scrape_oral_arguments to account for this - delete cl.scrapers.utils.extract_recap_documents which was generating a circular import. This function was not used anywhere
grossir
force-pushed
the
scrapers_update_from_text_command
branch
from
6a1fadb
to
ce22a58
Compare
grossir
force-pushed
the
scrapers_update_from_text_command
branch
from
f43e855
to
abc27aa
Compare
flooie
reviewed
Nov 21, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Nov 21, 2024
flooie
reviewed
Nov 21, 2024
|
@grossir just a few comments. This looks good and close. |
Also add tests for get_module_by_court_id function
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Helps solve: freelawproject/juriscraper#858