Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UIORGS-383: add donor info for organization summary #574

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023
Merged

Conversation

alisher-epam
Copy link
Contributor

@alisher-epam alisher-epam commented Oct 13, 2023

Purpose

UIORGS-383 - Designate Organization as donor

Approach

TODOS and Open Questions

Learning

Pre-Merge Checklist

Before merging this PR, please go through the following list and take appropriate actions.

  • I've added appropriate record to the CHANGELOG.md
  • Does this PR meet or exceed the expected quality standards?
    • Code coverage on new code is 80% or greater
    • Duplications on new code is 3% or less
    • There are no major code smells or security issues
  • Does this introduce breaking changes?
    • If any API-related changes - okapi interfaces and permissions are reviewed/changed correspondingly
    • There are no breaking changes in this PR.

If there are breaking changes, please STOP and consider the following:

  • What other modules will these changes impact?
  • Do JIRAs exist to update the impacted modules?
    • If not, please create them
    • Do they contain the appropriate level of detail? Which endpoints/schemas changed, etc.
    • Do they have all they appropriate links to blocked/related issues?
  • Are the JIRAs under active development?
    • If not, contact the project's PO and make sure they're aware of the urgency.
  • Do PRs exist for these changes?
    • If so, have they been approved?

Ideally all of the PRs involved in breaking changes would be merged in the same day to avoid breaking the folio-testing environment. Communication is paramount if that is to be achieved, especially as the number of intermodule and inter-team dependencies increase.

While it's helpful for reviewers to help identify potential problems, ensuring that it's safe to merge is ultimately the responsibility of the PR assignee.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 13, 2023

Jest Unit Test Statistics

    1 files  ±0    64 suites  ±0   3m 15s ⏱️ +53s
215 tests ±0  215 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
218 runs  ±0  218 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit f81b2bf. ± Comparison against base commit bba9631.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 13, 2023

BigTest Unit Test Statistics

0 tests  ±0   0 ✔️ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ±0 

Results for commit f81b2bf. ± Comparison against base commit bba9631.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@alisher-epam alisher-epam requested review from a team October 13, 2023 12:05
Copy link
Member

@zburke zburke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code changes LGTM but please verify the desired behavior of the confirmation dialog (which will appear both for vendors and donors). I am not confident the current implementation is correct.

I acknowledge @usavkov-epam's point that there is a separate story for reworking the layout, but if you have already done the work here I do not personally see the need to separate it. Up to you.

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 16, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@alisher-epam alisher-epam requested review from zburke, usavkov-epam and a team October 16, 2023 08:28
Copy link
Member

@zburke zburke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@alisher-epam alisher-epam merged commit c0f694e into master Oct 16, 2023
6 checks passed
@alisher-epam alisher-epam deleted the UIORGS-383 branch October 16, 2023 12:13
alisher-epam added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 18, 2023
* UIORGS-383: add donor info for organization summary

* tests: fix failing tests

* tests: remove failing snapshots

* tests: generate snapshot tests

* tests: update snapshot tests

* improve: bump package.json, fix organizations summary layout, remove checkbox handler
alisher-epam added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2023
* UIORGS-391: add initial routing config and components

* UIORGS-404 bump optional plugins to compatible versions (#572)

Use plugins compatible with the requested version of stripes (v9).

Refs UIORGS-404

* Release v5.0.0 (#573)

* UIORGS-383: add donor info for organization summary (#574)

* UIORGS-383: add donor info for organization summary

* tests: fix failing tests

* tests: remove failing snapshots

* tests: generate snapshot tests

* tests: update snapshot tests

* improve: bump package.json, fix organizations summary layout, remove checkbox handler

* feat: add CRUD for banking account types

* UIORGS-391: integrate with backend.

* tests: add test coverages

* remove failing test

* tests: add test cases

* tests: add test coverages

* tests: add test coverage

* tests: add test coverages

* refactor: code based on comments

* test: fix failing tests

* update package.json interfaces

* update: refactor code and component

* test: add test coverage

* update: permissions for organization settings

* update: permissions for organizations settings

* refactor: query key and checkbox component

* remove unnecessary permissions

* update: permissions for banking-account-types

* refactor: change the order of imports

* refactor: fix column naming issues

* optimize: add settings version for optimistic locking issue

* tests: fix failing tests

---------

Co-authored-by: Zak Burke <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants