-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 237
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dataquality - Relation validation enhancements for optional from clause, query limit, unit tests #3295
Dataquality - Relation validation enhancements for optional from clause, query limit, unit tests #3295
Conversation
Do we need to have an explicit property for runtime? Our goal is to move towards usage of |
hi Rafael here we are ultimately using the separate property for runtime to construct the |
functionName=from_T_m__Runtime_1__T_m_.name, | ||
importGroup=system::imports::coreImport, | ||
genericType=$returnType, | ||
multiplicity=ZeroMany, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lets double check that ZeroMany is correct here. I would expect multiplicity to be the same as the paramValue given the function signature
{ | ||
if (Objects.isNull(queryLimit)) | ||
{ | ||
return core_dataquality_generation_dataquality.Root_meta_external_dataquality_generateDataQualityQuery_DataQuality_1__Integer_MANY__LambdaFunction_1_(packageableElement, Lists.immutable.empty(), pureModel.getExecutionSupport()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lets change limit to 0..1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
approved, but follow up required.
What type of PR is this?
What does this PR do / why is it needed ?
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Other notes for reviewers:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
No