Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update LegendTdsResultParser to handle columns without relationalType #2331

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Oct 3, 2023

Conversation

shtirlets
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

Bug Fix

What does this PR do / why is it needed ?

Legend response does not provide "relationalType" for derived columns. Update the parser on Legend SQL Engine to handle the use case.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Other notes for reviewers:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

@shtirlets shtirlets requested a review from a team as a code owner September 29, 2023 19:43
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 29, 2023

Test Results

     684 files  +2       684 suites  +2   59m 19s ⏱️ - 1m 28s
11 259 tests +5  10 881 ✔️ +5  378 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
14 049 runs  +6  13 587 ✔️ +6  462 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 62e50d2. ± Comparison against base commit 7b96273.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@shtirlets shtirlets changed the title Update LegendTDSResult parser to handle columns without relationalType Update LegendTdsResultParser to handle columns without relationalType Oct 2, 2023
…/main/java/org/finos/legend/engine/postgres/handler/legend/LegendTdsResultParser.java
…/main/java/org/finos/legend/engine/postgres/handler/legend/LegendTdsResultParser.java
…/main/java/org/finos/legend/engine/postgres/handler/legend/LegendTdsResultParser.java
@aormerod-gs aormerod-gs merged commit 9db8aec into finos:master Oct 3, 2023
@shtirlets shtirlets deleted the handle-missing-relationaltype branch January 23, 2024 18:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants