Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add jsdoc for the python chat api #13

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

XaviPeiro
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed Changes

[describe the changes here...]

Linked Issues

[if applicable, add links to issues resolved by this PR]

Types of changes

What type of change does this pull request make (put an x in the boxes that apply)?

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue).
  • New feature added (non-breaking change that adds functionality).
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to stop working as expected).
  • Documentation update.
  • Something else (e.g., tests, scripts, example, deployment, infrastructure).

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING guide
  • Checks and tests pass locally

If applicable

  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have checked that code coverage does not decrease
  • I have added/updated the documentation

Further comments

[if this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off a discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did, what alternatives you considered, etc...]

@XaviPeiro XaviPeiro requested a review from qati as a code owner September 3, 2024 19:25
@XaviPeiro XaviPeiro changed the title Feat/add jsdoc for the python chat api feat: add jsdoc for the python chat api Sep 3, 2024
qati
qati previously approved these changes Sep 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants