Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Contributing and conduct #110

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2016
Merged

Contributing and conduct #110

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 2, 2016

Conversation

betatim
Copy link
Member

@betatim betatim commented Feb 29, 2016

Some fairly standard information on conduct and how to contribute.

Straight forward:

  • every collaborator can merge PRs
  • all changes are proposed by forking the repository and then making a PR
  • no one can merge their own work
  • use common sense, and
  • be nice to everyone

We should get along swimmingly!

@khinsen
Copy link
Collaborator

khinsen commented Mar 1, 2016

Does it make sense to add this now? The proposal is submitted, so this repository should not evolve much from now on. We should start another one for the real work.

@cranmer
Copy link
Contributor

cranmer commented Mar 1, 2016

Hi,

We could make a release, perhaps push to zenodo the version that was submitted, and still use this repository for further discussions.

Kyle

On Mar 1, 2016, at 7:14 AM, Konrad Hinsen [email protected] wrote:

Does it make sense to add this now? The proposal is submitted, so this repository should not evolve much from now on. We should start another one for the real work.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #110 (comment).

@ctb
Copy link
Member

ctb commented Mar 1, 2016 via email

@cranmer
Copy link
Contributor

cranmer commented Mar 1, 2016

Fine with me. A release seems to make sense independently
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:36 AM C. Titus Brown [email protected]
wrote:

RIO has offered to publish open science prize proposals --

https://twitter.com/RIOJournal/status/703141211612155904

How about doing that?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#110 (comment)
.

@khinsen
Copy link
Collaborator

khinsen commented Mar 1, 2016

@ctb +1

@cranmer +1 as well, though it will take me some time to get used to the term "release" for a piece of prose that moreover is not supposed to evolve. I'd call it an archival copy, but the result is the same.

But the real question concerning this PR is if we continue to use it as a place for discussion.

@lukasheinrich
Copy link
Contributor

👍 for both release w/ zenodo and publishing in RIO (if it's not too involved)

@betatim
Copy link
Member Author

betatim commented Mar 1, 2016

I wanted to add it mainly for people who come here for the discussions in the issues. I think it makes sense to have those in this repo for a while longer.

I think we should use #15 to come up with a few next steps. One of them should be creating everpub/specs or everpub/mocks (or similar) where we post mockups or specs for how things might work together.

khinsen added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 2, 2016
@khinsen khinsen merged commit 570ba0f into everpub:master Mar 2, 2016
@khinsen
Copy link
Collaborator

khinsen commented Mar 2, 2016

👍

@khinsen khinsen mentioned this pull request Mar 2, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants