-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify Comment on Removing Duplicate L1 Tokens Update TokenListTable… #1140
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
….tsx This pull request addresses a small but important improvement in the clarity of a comment in the code.
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes made in the Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@0xminds has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 23 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)components/TokenListTable.tsx (1)
The updated comment better describes how duplicate detection works, making it clear that tokens are considered duplicates based on their addresses rather than other properties like symbols or names. Let's verify if there are any actual duplicate tokens by address in the tokenlist: ✅ Verification successfulThe comment clarification is accurate and the duplicate removal logic is necessary The code imports the tokenlist from
The updated comment clearly documents that the deduplication is based on token addresses, which aligns with the implementation. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for duplicate token addresses within the same chain in the tokenlist
# Expected: If duplicates exist, this helps validate the necessity of the duplicate removal logic
# Parse the tokenlist and group tokens by chainId, then check for duplicate addresses
cat node_modules/@eth-optimism/tokenlist/dist/tokenlist.json | jq '
.tokens
| group_by(.chainId)
| .[]
| select(
(group_by(.address) | map(select(length > 1))) | length > 0
)
| "Chain \(.[0].chainId) has duplicate token addresses"
'
Length of output: 332 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's first locate the tokenlist file in the repository
fd -t f "tokenlist.json"
# Then examine its content if found
fd -t f "tokenlist.json" -x cat {}
Length of output: 61 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the TokenListTable component to understand where the tokenlist is imported from
rg -A 5 "import.*tokenlist" components/TokenListTable.tsx
# Also check for any direct references to tokenlist
rg "tokenlist" components/TokenListTable.tsx
Length of output: 399 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Description:
This pull request addresses a small but important improvement in the clarity of a comment in the code.
In the original code, the comment:
// Remove any duplicate L1 tokens
Can be made more specific. To enhance readability and precision, the comment has been updated to:
// Remove duplicate L1 tokens by address
Why this is important:
The updated comment clarifies that duplicates are being removed based on the token's address, rather than a vague reference to "any duplicate." This improvement ensures that the code's behavior is more clearly communicated, making it easier for developers to understand the intent of the logic and maintain the code effectively.