Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: shuffling of primary location candidates #242

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 17, 2024

Conversation

sebhoerl
Copy link
Contributor

I took the liberty of creating a PR that fixes #237. Running now to see if it has any impact on the unit tests.

@sebhoerl
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vincent-leblond Sorry for yet another request, could you please check what impact this PR has on your flow plots? I would wait for a brief analysis from your side before merging this.

@vincent-leblond
Copy link
Contributor

We looked at the PR with Marie. In the flow analysis, there is not much difference. It make sense as our flow analysis is done on municipalities and IRIS.
However, looking at the code, we think that the PR is important to valide as it fixes a real issue.

@sebhoerl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, I agree. Even though you don't see a big impact, what I take from your message is that there is also no negative impact and no strange things are happening. So we can merge it :)

@sebhoerl sebhoerl enabled auto-merge (squash) June 17, 2024 21:22
@sebhoerl sebhoerl merged commit e892be8 into develop Jun 17, 2024
2 checks passed
@sebhoerl sebhoerl deleted the fix/primary-location-candidates branch June 17, 2024 21:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Statistical bug in primary locations attribution
2 participants