Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Types #166

Merged
merged 75 commits into from
Oct 5, 2023
Merged

Types #166

merged 75 commits into from
Oct 5, 2023

Conversation

SimonGuilloud
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR is about making a front end for first order logic, allowing to define more specialized Terms, starting with functions, numbers and pairs and ultimately arbitrary types. The implementation aims to be as general as possible to allow for future development.
Incidentally, it solves some unsatisfactory problems of using the Kernel's FOL: The difference between Variables and VariableLabels, runtime assertions to check arity (with the updated "front" this is checked at compile time), etc.

With FOL redefined, it needs to be integrated to the existing proof framework, while maintaining correspondance with kernel objects. Depending of the kind of object, this range from easy to systematic but tedious to non-trivial.

@SimonGuilloud SimonGuilloud marked this pull request as draft May 9, 2023 19:59
@SimonGuilloud SimonGuilloud marked this pull request as ready for review September 22, 2023 16:40
@SimonGuilloud
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This should be ready for merge.

@SimonGuilloud SimonGuilloud mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2023
build.sbt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sankalpgambhir
Copy link
Member

Looks great overall; I checked as much of the technical stuff as I could at this moment. All theory files pass as well! Minor comments as above ^^^ and then we can merge!

…n lisa-examples, add a newline in build.properties
Copy link
Member

@sankalpgambhir sankalpgambhir left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good now! Thanks for changing according to comments

@sankalpgambhir sankalpgambhir merged commit 265ed45 into epfl-lara:main Oct 5, 2023
1 check passed
@sankalpgambhir sankalpgambhir mentioned this pull request Oct 5, 2023
@SimonGuilloud SimonGuilloud deleted the types branch February 8, 2024 15:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants