Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check also with Jackson 2.15.4, 2.16.2, and 2.17.0 #67

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

dmikurube
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@dmikurube dmikurube added this to the v0.5.0 milestone Apr 3, 2024
@dmikurube dmikurube requested a review from a team as a code owner April 3, 2024 07:45
@dmikurube dmikurube changed the base branch from master to actions-setup-java-v4 April 3, 2024 07:45
@dmikurube dmikurube changed the title Check with jackson 2.15.4 2.16.2 2.17.0 Check also with Jackson 2.15.4, 2.16.2, and 2.17.0 Apr 3, 2024
@hiroyuki-sato
Copy link
Member

CI failed in Jackson 2.16.2 and 2.17.0. Please take a look when you get a chance.

The test has started to fail since Jackson 2.16.0 because of the following changes:

- FasterXML/jackson-core#1053
- FasterXML/jackson-core#1142

These were "fixing" the following issues:

- FasterXML/jackson-core#1050
- FasterXML/jackson-core#1141
@dmikurube dmikurube force-pushed the check-with-Jackson-2.15.4-2.16.2-2.17.0 branch from 8926815 to 8e5841e Compare April 3, 2024 09:45
@dmikurube
Copy link
Member Author

Base automatically changed from actions-setup-java-v4 to master April 3, 2024 09:48
Copy link
Member

@hiroyuki-sato hiroyuki-sato left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM👍

@dmikurube
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks!

@dmikurube dmikurube merged commit 58acc1a into master Apr 3, 2024
5 checks passed
@dmikurube dmikurube deleted the check-with-Jackson-2.15.4-2.16.2-2.17.0 branch April 3, 2024 15:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants