Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documents that nested fields aren't supported for Theshold rules "Group by" operations #4683

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2024

Conversation

benironside
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #4119 by adding a note that says you can't use nested fields for "group by" to the doc about how to make a threshold rule.

Please let me know if you think we should add any other details. One thing we could consider adding a link to this page: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/8.12/nested.html

Preview: Create a threshold rule

@benironside benironside self-assigned this Jan 25, 2024
@benironside benironside requested a review from a team as a code owner January 25, 2024 23:04
Copy link

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Help us out by validating the Buildkite preview and reporting issues here.
Please also be sure to double check all images to ensure they are correct in the preview.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

Copy link
Contributor

@joepeeples joepeeples left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! I'm leaning away from adding a link to the nested fields docs. The concept seems easy to understand on its own, and that page gets real technical real fast, so it feels like extra homework for the reader instead of giving more clarity.

@benironside benironside merged commit fbc53b5 into main Jan 26, 2024
5 checks passed
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2024
(cherry picked from commit fbc53b5)
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2024
(cherry picked from commit fbc53b5)

# Conflicts:
#	docs/detections/rules-ui-create.asciidoc
benironside added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
(cherry picked from commit fbc53b5)

Co-authored-by: Benjamin Ironside Goldstein <[email protected]>
benironside added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
…es "Group by" operations (backport #4683) (#4694)

* first pass, minor bugfix (#4683)

(cherry picked from commit fbc53b5)

# Conflicts:
#	docs/detections/rules-ui-create.asciidoc

* fix merge conflict

---------

Co-authored-by: Benjamin Ironside Goldstein <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Ironside Goldstein <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Document unsupported field types for threshold rule type Group by feature
2 participants