Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fleet] Add feature for syncing integrations on remote output target cluster #199978

Conversation

jillguyonnet
Copy link
Contributor

@jillguyonnet jillguyonnet commented Nov 13, 2024

🚧 WIP

Summary

Closes #192361

This PR adds a feature to remote Elasticsearch Fleet outputs for syncing integrations on remote clusters. It is guarded behind the remoteIntegrationSync feature flag.

Checklist

Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.

Risk Matrix

Delete this section if it is not applicable to this PR.

Before closing this PR, invite QA, stakeholders, and other developers to identify risks that should be tested prior to the change/feature release.

When forming the risk matrix, consider some of the following examples and how they may potentially impact the change:

Risk Probability Severity Mitigation/Notes
Multiple Spaces—unexpected behavior in non-default Kibana Space. Low High Integration tests will verify that all features are still supported in non-default Kibana Space and when user switches between spaces.
Multiple nodes—Elasticsearch polling might have race conditions when multiple Kibana nodes are polling for the same tasks. High Low Tasks are idempotent, so executing them multiple times will not result in logical error, but will degrade performance. To test for this case we add plenty of unit tests around this logic and document manual testing procedure.
Code should gracefully handle cases when feature X or plugin Y are disabled. Medium High Unit tests will verify that any feature flag or plugin combination still results in our service operational.
See more potential risk examples

For maintainers

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 Jobs for this PR can be triggered through checkboxes. 🚧

ℹ️ To trigger the CI, please tick the checkbox below 👇

  • Click to trigger kibana-pull-request for this PR!
  • Click to trigger kibana-deploy-project-from-pr for this PR!

@jillguyonnet jillguyonnet self-assigned this Nov 13, 2024
@jillguyonnet jillguyonnet added the Team:Fleet Team label for Observability Data Collection Fleet team label Nov 13, 2024
@jillguyonnet jillguyonnet force-pushed the fleet/192361-remote-output-synchronize branch from b75fc99 to ddbc29c Compare November 13, 2024 17:20
@jillguyonnet
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing this PR, as this approach cannot be implemented with a secret remote API key and the technical definition is being revisited (see #192361 (comment) and further comments).

@jillguyonnet jillguyonnet deleted the fleet/192361-remote-output-synchronize branch November 19, 2024 17:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Team:Fleet Team label for Observability Data Collection Fleet team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Fleet] Add feature to synchronize integrations on remote ES clusters
2 participants