Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] Update verify_es_serverless_image.yml patterns #195813

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

jbudz
Copy link
Member

@jbudz jbudz commented Oct 10, 2024

To make sure these test suites are run during elasticsearch image verification.

Related to #195811

@jbudz jbudz added Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes backport:skip This commit does not require backporting labels Oct 10, 2024
@jbudz jbudz requested a review from a team as a code owner October 10, 2024 17:53
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-operations (Team:Operations)

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

Copy link
Member

@pheyos pheyos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@pheyos pheyos merged commit 57ce380 into elastic:main Oct 11, 2024
28 checks passed
pheyos added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2024
## Summary

This PR adds the `esGate` tag to the serverless tests in the deployment
agnostic test directory. This will make sure these tests are run as part
of the Elasticsearch serverless checks.

Related to #195813 where the deployment agnostic test configs are added
to the pipeline for the Kibana side.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:skip This commit does not require backporting release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v9.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants