-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removed _Source use from get_trace_items
#191647
Closed
Closed
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
111df68
wip
bryce-b 78e1b65
removed _source usage from get_trace_items.ts
bryce-b a2a0565
removed comment
bryce-b fddcff4
updated tests and fixes
bryce-b 18954f6
fixed tests to reflect changes from removal of _source usage
bryce-b 3bd5c99
changed span.links to use span.links.span.id and span.links.trace.id
bryce-b 6a4a8e8
Merge branch 'main' into remove-_source-from-queries
bryce-b d438980
fixed additional fields missed
bryce-b 96ad20e
fixed EventOutcome type
bryce-b 0fe5b64
additional fixes
bryce-b File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to verify taking span links from
fields
works for our use case. My suspicion is that we need to take span links from_source
becausefields
doesn't return an array of span link objects, but arrays for all leaf fields, such asspan.links.trace.id
. Also, the content for OTel span links and APM span links will look slightly differently.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, it appears both will have to be specified:
span.links.trace.id
andspan.links.span.id
. Are there any additional leaf fields? I can experiment with collecting them and dedotting.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it seems like
span.links.trace.id
andspan.links.trace.id
are string types, while the processed structure is an array ofSpanLink[]
which implies there may be more than one span link per span, but I'm not able to find examples of spans with more than one SpanLink.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did some tests and it appears that span.links.trace.id and span.links.span.id will be two equal length and the ids at relative indices are associated.
I was able to recreate the
SpanLink[]
structure by merging these two arrays together. A commit is coming shortly.