Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Develop #961

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 23, 2024
Merged

Develop #961

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 23, 2024

Conversation

debasishchakraborty-egovt
Copy link
Collaborator

@debasishchakraborty-egovt debasishchakraborty-egovt commented Sep 23, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added access control for division admin users in the Employee Details page, allowing them to view the primary village information.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved rendering of department and designation rows by removing unnecessary line breaks for better readability.
  • Refactor

    • Streamlined the structure of the submitAction function for enhanced clarity without changing functionality.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 23, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes involve enhancements to access control in the EmployeeDetails.js file, where a new check for DIVISION_ADMIN access has been implemented. Additionally, modifications in the EstimationService.java file alter the control flow of the getWaterEstimationCharge method by commenting out an early return statement, allowing for further processing when totalUOM is zero. These updates improve user experience and maintain the overall functionality of the application.

Changes

File Change Summary
frontend/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/hrms/src/pages/EmployeeDetails.js Added access control check for DIVISION_ADMIN, streamlined rendering of department and designation rows, and modified the submitAction function.
municipal-services/ws-calculator/src/main/java/org/egov/wscalculation/service/EstimationService.java Commented out early return for totalUOM == 0.0 in getWaterEstimationCharge, altering control flow to allow further processing.

Possibly related PRs

  • Develop #946: The SearchUserForm.js file introduces a new constant DIV_ADMIN to check user access, which is directly related to the new access control check for DIVISION_ADMIN in EmployeeDetails.js.

Suggested reviewers

  • pradeepkumarcm-egov

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
Access checks now never stop.
With a click, the village glows,
Water charges flow like prose.
Changes made with care and cheer,
Hop along, the path is clear! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@pradeepkumarcm-egov pradeepkumarcm-egov merged commit 861db5e into master Sep 23, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants