[HCMPRE-586] plan facility search API #899
Conversation
palak-egov
requested review from
kavi-egov and
sathishp-eGov
as code owners
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new set of classes and interfaces for managing plan facilities within a health services application. Key components include the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/PlanFacilityRepository.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...th-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/impl/PlanFacilityRepositoryImpl.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...th-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/impl/PlanFacilityRepositoryImpl.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...th-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/impl/PlanFacilityRepositoryImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/service/PlanFacilityService.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/service/PlanFacilityService.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/service/PlanFacilityService.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/service/PlanFacilityService.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/service/PlanFacilityService.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
palak-egov
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 28
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/PlanFacilityRepository.java (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/impl/PlanFacilityRepositoryImpl.java (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/querybuilder/PlanFacilityQueryBuilder.java (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/rowmapper/PlanFacilityRowMapper.java (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/service/PlanFacilityService.java (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/util/ServiceUtil.java (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/controllers/PlanFacilityController.java (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacility.java (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacilityRequest.java (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacilityResponse.java (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacilitySearchCriteria.java (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacilitySearchRequest.java (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/resources/application.properties (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/resources/db/migrate.sh (1 hunks)
- health-services/plan-service/src/main/resources/db/migration/main/V20240923113045__plan_facility_create_ddl.sql (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (6)
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/PlanFacilityRepository.java (2)
Learnt from: Taniya-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#914 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/impl/PlanFacilityRepositoryImpl.java:22-33 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T13:12:05.028Z Learning: In this codebase, exception handling in repositories follows a consistent approach across files. Enhancements to exception handling are deferred to maintain uniformity.Learnt from: Saloni-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#906 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/PlanFacilityRepository.java:10-12 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T08:10:11.360Z Learning: In this codebase, `update` methods in repositories are designed not to return any value.health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/impl/PlanFacilityRepositoryImpl.java (2)
Learnt from: Taniya-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#914 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/impl/PlanFacilityRepositoryImpl.java:22-33 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T13:12:05.028Z Learning: In this codebase, exception handling in repositories follows a consistent approach across files. Enhancements to exception handling are deferred to maintain uniformity.Learnt from: Saloni-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#906 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/PlanFacilityRepository.java:10-12 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T08:10:11.360Z Learning: In this codebase, `update` methods in repositories are designed not to return any value.health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/service/PlanFacilityService.java (4)
Learnt from: Taniya-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#914 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/impl/PlanFacilityRepositoryImpl.java:22-33 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T13:12:05.028Z Learning: In this codebase, exception handling in repositories follows a consistent approach across files. Enhancements to exception handling are deferred to maintain uniformity.Learnt from: Taniya-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#914 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/service/PlanFacilityService.java:13-19 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T14:26:23.995Z Learning: In this codebase, the `final` keyword is not required for dependency-injected fields in services.Learnt from: Taniya-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#914 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/controllers/PlanFacilityController.java:26-36 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T18:13:52.611Z Learning: In this codebase, when creating resources via POST requests, HTTP status 202 Accepted is intentionally used as per the requirements.Learnt from: Saloni-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#906 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/PlanFacilityRepository.java:10-12 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T08:10:11.360Z Learning: In this codebase, `update` methods in repositories are designed not to return any value.health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/controllers/PlanFacilityController.java (3)
Learnt from: Taniya-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#914 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/controllers/PlanFacilityController.java:26-36 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T18:13:52.611Z Learning: In this codebase, when creating resources via POST requests, HTTP status 202 Accepted is intentionally used as per the requirements.Learnt from: Saloni-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#906 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/controllers/PlanFacilityController.java:24-34 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T11:15:18.213Z Learning: In this codebase, when updating plan facilities, `HttpStatus.ACCEPTED` (202) is intentionally used in `PlanFacilityController` as per the requirements.Learnt from: Saloni-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#906 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/controllers/PlanFacilityController.java:30-34 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T11:00:34.017Z Learning: In this codebase, exceptions are already handled globally, so explicit error handling in controllers is not necessary.health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacility.java (4)
Learnt from: Saloni-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#906 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacility.java:61-67 Timestamp: 2024-09-27T04:31:09.991Z Learning: In the `addServiceBoundariesItem` method in `PlanFacility.java`, it's acceptable to initialize `serviceBoundaries` if it's null without adding a null check for `serviceBoundariesItem`.Learnt from: Taniya-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#914 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacility.java:1-69 Timestamp: 2024-09-27T02:31:33.207Z Learning: In the `PlanFacility` model, the `active` field is set to `true` during creation, so it does not need to be initialized to `true` in the class definition.Learnt from: Saloni-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#906 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacility.java:28-59 Timestamp: 2024-09-27T04:33:06.202Z Learning: In this project, the `additionalDetails` field is intentionally typed as `Object`, and it's the accepted approach.Learnt from: Taniya-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#914 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/service/PlanFacilityService.java:13-19 Timestamp: 2024-09-26T14:26:23.995Z Learning: In this codebase, the `final` keyword is not required for dependency-injected fields in services.health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacilitySearchRequest.java (1)
Learnt from: Taniya-eGov PR: egovernments/health-campaign-services#914 File: health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/facility/FacilitySearchRequest.java:15-19 Timestamp: 2024-09-27T04:37:54.293Z Learning: In the `FacilitySearchRequest` class, the JSON property for `facilitySearchCriteria` should remain as `Facility` to maintain consistency with the existing API contract and avoid confusing existing API consumers.
🪛 Shellcheck
health-services/plan-service/src/main/resources/db/migrate.sh
[info] 3-3: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
[info] 3-3: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
[info] 3-3: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
[info] 3-3: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
[info] 3-3: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
🔇 Additional comments (43)
health-services/plan-service/src/main/resources/db/migrate.sh (1)
3-3:⚠️ Potential issueClarify the reason for changing from 'migrate' to 'repair'
The Flyway command has been changed from 'migrate' to 'repair'. This is a significant alteration that changes the behavior of the script:
- 'migrate' applies pending migrations to the database.
- 'repair' fixes the schema history table without applying migrations.
This change could have substantial impacts on the database state and migration process. Could you please provide the rationale behind this modification? Are there specific issues with the schema history table that necessitate this change?
To understand the current state of migrations, please run the following command:
This will provide information about applied and pending migrations, which can help in determining whether 'repair' is necessary.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck
[info] 3-3: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
[info] 3-3: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
[info] 3-3: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
[info] 3-3: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
[info] 3-3: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting.
(SC2086)
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/PlanFacilityRepository.java (5)
1-5: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package declaration and imports are correctly defined and relevant to the interface's purpose.
7-7: LGTM: Interface declaration is well-defined.The
PlanFacilityRepositoryinterface is properly declared as public and follows Java naming conventions.
8-8: LGTM:createmethod signature is appropriate.The
createmethod is correctly defined as a void method, which aligns with the repository pattern and the codebase's conventions for similar operations.
10-12: LGTM:searchandupdatemethods are well-defined.Both method signatures are appropriate for their respective operations:
- The
searchmethod returns aList<PlanFacility>and takes aPlanFacilitySearchCriteriaparameter, which is suitable for a search operation.- The
updatemethod is correctly defined as void, aligning with the codebase's conventions for update operations.It's good to see that the previous feedback about renaming the
planSearchCriteriaparameter has been addressed.
1-13: Overall assessment: Well-structured repository interface.The
PlanFacilityRepositoryinterface is well-designed and adheres to Java conventions and the codebase's patterns. It provides a clear contract for implementing classes, covering the essential operations for plan facilities (create, search, and update). The method signatures are consistent with the established conventions in the project.Good job on implementing the feedback from previous reviews and maintaining consistency with the codebase's standards.
health-services/plan-service/src/main/resources/db/migration/main/V20240923113045__plan_facility_create_ddl.sql (3)
1-3: LGTM: Table creation and primary key constraint.The table name
plan_facility_linkageaccurately reflects its purpose. Theidcolumn as varchar(64) is suitable for UUID storage, which is a good practice for distributed systems. The primary key constraint is correctly defined.Also applies to: 15-15
3-8: Addressing past comment on varchar usage.Regarding the past comment questioning the use of varchar for a specific column, it's worth noting that varchar is used consistently across multiple columns in this table. This is a common practice, especially for columns that might store UUIDs or other string-based identifiers.
If there are concerns about the use of varchar for any specific column, please clarify which column is in question and provide more context about the expected data type or storage requirements.
4-7: Verify theresiding_boundarycolumn definition.The column definitions and foreign key constraints for
tenant_id,plan_configuration_id, andfacility_idlook good. The use of varchar(64) is consistent and appropriate for these columns.However, the
residing_boundarycolumn is defined similarly but doesn't have a foreign key constraint. If this column is supposed to reference another table (e.g., a boundaries table), consider adding a foreign key constraint. If it's intentionally not referencing another table, please confirm that this is the desired behavior.To verify if there's a boundaries table that
residing_boundaryshould reference, run:Also applies to: 16-17
✅ Verification successful
The
residing_boundarycolumn is correctly defined without a foreign key constraint.The
residing_boundarycolumn is defined asvarchar(64)and does not reference another table, as confirmed by the codebase analysis. If this is the intended design, no further action is required.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for existence of a boundaries table rg --type sql 'CREATE TABLE.*boundar(y|ies)'Length of output: 46
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for foreign key constraints referencing 'residing_boundary' rg --type sql 'FOREIGN KEY.*residing_boundary'Length of output: 48
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacilityRequest.java (3)
1-11: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are correct.The package declaration and imports are appropriate for the class requirements. All necessary imports are present, and there are no unused imports.
15-20: LGTM: Appropriate use of annotations.The class-level annotations are well-chosen:
@Validatedenables validation support.- Lombok annotations (
@Data,@AllArgsConstructor,@NoArgsConstructor,@Builder) effectively reduce boilerplate code.
This combination is suitable for a DTO (Data Transfer Object) class.
1-30: Formatting looks good: Addressing past review comment.Regarding the previous comment about formatting the class with proper spaces:
- The current formatting appears consistent and follows standard Java conventions.
- There are no obvious formatting issues in the provided code.
If there were specific formatting concerns in the previous version, they seem to have been addressed in this iteration.
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacilitySearchRequest.java (2)
1-11: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are correct.The package declaration and imports are appropriate for the class being defined.
1-30: Formatting issues have been resolved.The formatting issues mentioned in the previous review (two spaces at the end and no space at the top) have been addressed in this version of the file. The overall formatting of the class looks good now.
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/util/ServiceUtil.java (2)
1-7: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package declaration and imports are correctly specified for the intended functionality. Good job on including only the necessary imports.
1-23: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider moving this functionality to an existing utility class.
A previous review comment suggested moving this function to an existing
commonUtilclass. This could improve code organization and reduce duplication. However, we need more information about thecommonUtilclass and its location.To make an informed decision, please run the following script to locate the
commonUtilclass and examine its contents:After reviewing the results, consider whether it's appropriate to move the
validateStringAgainstRegexmethod to thecommonUtilclass. If you decide to move it, ensure to update all references to this method in other parts of the codebase.health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacilitySearchCriteria.java (4)
1-12: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are correct and well-organized.The package declaration and imports are appropriate for the class implementation. All necessary dependencies are included without any redundant or unused imports.
1-39: LGTM: Overall structure and design are well-suited for a search criteria class.The
PlanFacilitySearchCriteriaclass is well-structured and follows good design principles:
- Encapsulation is maintained with private fields and Lombok-generated accessors.
- The builder pattern (via @builder) allows for flexible and readable object creation.
- Immutability is ensured by default through the @DaTa annotation, which is suitable for a criteria object.
- The use of Set for ids is efficient for unique id searches.
The class effectively serves its purpose as a search criteria object for plan facilities.
39-39: Resolved: New line added at the end of the file.The previous comment about a missing new line at the end of the file has been addressed. The file now correctly ends with a new line, which is a good practice for version control systems and some compilers.
1-39: Overall assessment: Well-implemented search criteria class with room for minor enhancements.The
PlanFacilitySearchCriteriaclass is well-designed and implements the necessary functionality for searching plan facilities. It makes good use of Lombok, Jackson, and validation annotations to create a clean and functional search criteria object.Key strengths:
- Appropriate use of annotations for JSON mapping, validation, and boilerplate code generation.
- Well-structured fields with clear purposes.
- Use of generics and appropriate data structures (e.g., Set for ids).
Suggested enhancements:
- Add more specific validation constraints to ensure data integrity.
- Include Javadoc comments for better code documentation.
- Consider using @JsonInclude to optimize JSON output.
- Add @ToString.Exclude for potentially large collections to prevent performance issues in logging.
These enhancements would further improve the robustness, maintainability, and efficiency of the class. Overall, the implementation provides a solid foundation for the plan facility search API.
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacilityResponse.java (3)
1-23: LGTM: Class structure and annotations are well-defined.The class structure is appropriate for a response model. The use of Lombok annotations (
@Data,@AllArgsConstructor,@NoArgsConstructor,@Builder) effectively reduces boilerplate code. The@Validatedannotation is a good practice for ensuring data integrity in validation contexts.
25-30: LGTM: Fields are well-defined and properly annotated.The
responseInfoandplanFacilityfields are appropriately defined for a response model. The use of@JsonPropertyensures proper JSON handling, and the@Validannotation onplanFacilityallows for cascading validation, which is a good practice.
1-44: Overall, well-structured response model with minor improvements suggested.The
PlanFacilityResponseclass is well-designed for its purpose as a response model. It uses appropriate annotations, has well-defined fields, and provides a clear structure for the response data. The main suggestion for improvement is to remove the redundant builder methods and rely on the Lombok-generated builder, which would simplify the class without losing functionality.To further enhance the class:
- Consider adding documentation comments for the fields to improve code readability.
- If specific validation rules are required, consider adding validation annotations (e.g.,
@NotNull,@Size) to the fields.- Ensure that the
PlanFacilityclass (not shown in this file) is also well-structured and properly annotated.health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/controllers/PlanFacilityController.java (3)
18-20: LGTM: Class declaration and annotations are correct.The
PlanFacilityControllerclass is properly annotated with@Controllerand@RequestMapping("plan"), following best practices for Spring MVC controllers.
1-28: Overall, the implementation ofPlanFacilityControlleris well-structured and follows Spring MVC best practices.The controller correctly handles the plan facility search operation. A few minor improvements were suggested:
- Consider using constructor injection for
PlanFacilityService.- Verify the HTTP status code usage for consistency with other search endpoints in the codebase.
These suggestions aim to enhance the code's maintainability and consistency but don't impact the current functionality.
23-27: LGTM: Method implementation is correct. Verify HTTP status usage.The
searchPostmethod is well-implemented with proper request mapping, validation, and response handling. However, there's a consideration regarding HTTP status codes:
- The current implementation uses
HttpStatus.OK(200), which is appropriate for successful search operations.- Previous learnings indicate that
HttpStatus.ACCEPTED(202) is intentionally used for creating resources via POST requests in this codebase.Since this is a search operation and not a resource creation, the current status (200) seems appropriate. However, it might be worth verifying if there are any specific requirements for using 202 in search operations as well.
To ensure consistency across the codebase, you may want to check other search endpoints:
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/service/PlanFacilityService.java (3)
11-14: LGTM!The class declaration and field look good. The
@Serviceannotation is correctly applied, and thePlanFacilityRepositoryfield follows the codebase conventions for dependency injection.
16-18: LGTM!The constructor is well-implemented, properly injecting the
PlanFacilityRepositorydependency.
26-33: LGTM!The core implementation of the
searchPlanFacilitymethod looks good. It correctly delegates the search to the repository and builds the response using theResponseInfoUtil.health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacility.java (5)
20-25: LGTM: Class structure and annotations are appropriate.The use of Lombok annotations (@validated, @DaTa, @AllArgsConstructor, @NoArgsConstructor, @builder) is appropriate for this model class, reducing boilerplate code and ensuring proper validation.
51-52: LGTM: Use of Object type for 'additionalDetails'.The use of Object type for the 'additionalDetails' field is appropriate in this context, as it allows for flexible additional data storage. This approach is consistent with the project's conventions.
61-67: LGTM: addServiceBoundariesItem method implementation.The method correctly initializes the list if it's null and adds the new item. Returning 'this' allows for method chaining, which is a good practice. This implementation is consistent with the project's conventions.
3-15: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate.The import statements include all necessary dependencies for Jakarta validation, Jackson annotations, Lombok, Spring validation, and the AuditDetails model. These imports are consistent with the class requirements.
59-60: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Remove extra blank line.
There's an unnecessary blank line at line 60. Consider removing it to maintain consistent formatting throughout the file.
private AuditDetails auditDetails = null; - public PlanFacility addServiceBoundariesItem(String serviceBoundariesItem) {Likely invalid or redundant comment.
health-services/plan-service/src/main/resources/application.properties (1)
12-12:⚠️ Potential issueSecurity and configuration management concerns
The change to the database password raises several issues:
- Hardcoding passwords in configuration files is a security risk and violates best practices.
- Committing environment-specific configurations (like local setup changes) to version control can lead to issues in different environments.
- The Flyway password (line 16) hasn't been updated, which could cause inconsistencies.
Consider the following recommendations:
- Use environment variables or a secure vault system for sensitive information like passwords.
- Keep environment-specific configurations separate from the main application.properties file.
- Ensure consistency across all database-related configurations.
Example of using environment variables:
spring.datasource.password=${DB_PASSWORD} spring.flyway.password=${DB_PASSWORD}Then set the
DB_PASSWORDenvironment variable in your local setup or deployment environment.This change appears to be a local setup modification, which aligns with the previous reviewer's concern about committing such changes.
To check if this is an isolated change or if there are other potential issues, let's scan the repository for hardcoded passwords:
#!/bin/bash # Search for potential hardcoded passwords in properties files echo "Searching for potential hardcoded passwords in properties files:" rg --type properties 'password\s*=\s*[^${}]' --glob '!**/target/**' # Search for potential hardcoded passwords in Java files echo "Searching for potential hardcoded passwords in Java files:" rg --type java 'setPassword\(' --glob '!**/target/**'This script will help identify if there are other instances of hardcoded passwords in the codebase that need to be addressed.
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/impl/PlanFacilityRepositoryImpl.java (5)
20-37: LGTM: Class structure and initialization look good.The class is properly annotated as a repository and uses constructor injection for dependency management, which is a good practice. The spacing issues mentioned in past comments seem to have been addressed.
39-42: Clarify the empty implementation of the create method.The
createmethod is currently empty. If this is intentional (e.g., to be implemented later), consider adding a TODO comment. If not, please provide the implementation.
66-69: Clarify the empty implementation of the update method.The
updatemethod is currently empty. If this is intentional (e.g., to be implemented later), consider adding a TODO comment. If not, please provide the implementation.
1-94: Consistent approach to exception handling noted.The implementation follows a consistent approach to exception handling across repository files, as noted in the learnings. This allows for centralized error handling at a higher level in the application architecture.
1-94: Overall, the implementation looks good with some minor improvements suggested.The
PlanFacilityRepositoryImplclass provides a solid implementation of thePlanFacilityRepositoryinterface. It follows good practices such as constructor injection, use of query builders, and custom row mappers. The two-step search process in thesearchmethod is an interesting approach that could benefit from a brief explanation.Key points for improvement:
- Clarify the empty implementations of
createandupdatemethods.- Consider using debug level for SQL query logging to enhance security in production environments.
- Add a brief comment explaining the rationale behind the two-step search process in the
searchmethod.These minor adjustments will enhance the code's clarity and maintainability.
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/rowmapper/PlanFacilityRowMapper.java (1)
29-62: Overall, the 'extractData' method is well-implementedThe method efficiently maps the
ResultSetto a list ofPlanFacilityobjects, correctly handling audit details and additional fields.health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/querybuilder/PlanFacilityQueryBuilder.java (2)
42-43: Add a blank line between methods for consistency.To maintain consistent formatting, please add a blank line between the closing brace of one method and the declaration of the next method.
68-69: Verify the necessity of usingLinkedHashSetfor residing boundaries.In the
buildPlanFacilitySearchQuerymethod, residing boundaries are converted to aLinkedHashSetbefore being added to the prepared statement. This removes duplicate boundaries but maintains insertion order. Please verify if eliminating duplicates is the intended behavior and if the order of boundaries affects the query results.Run the following script to check how
residingBoundariesare populated and whether duplicates are possible:
| service_boundaries varchar(2048), | ||
| additional_details JSONB, | ||
| active boolean, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider the structure of service_boundaries.
The additional_details column as JSONB and the active boolean column are well-defined and follow good practices.
However, the service_boundaries column is defined as varchar(2048), which is quite large. This suggests it might store multiple values or a complex structure. Consider if this data would be better stored in a separate table with a one-to-many relationship, or as a JSONB column for better querying capabilities.
If service_boundaries indeed stores multiple values, consider this alternative structure:
CREATE TABLE plan_facility_service_boundary (
id varchar(64) PRIMARY KEY,
plan_facility_linkage_id varchar(64),
boundary_id varchar(64),
FOREIGN KEY (plan_facility_linkage_id) REFERENCES plan_facility_linkage(id),
FOREIGN KEY (boundary_id) REFERENCES boundaries(id) -- Assuming a boundaries table exists
);This structure would allow for better data normalization and easier querying of individual service boundaries.
| created_by varchar(64), | ||
| created_time bigint, | ||
| last_modified_by varchar(64), | ||
| last_modified_time bigint, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM: Audit columns with a suggestion.
The audit columns (created_by, created_time, last_modified_by, last_modified_time) are well-defined and follow a common pattern for tracking creation and modification metadata.
While using bigint for timestamp storage is common and works well for Unix timestamps, consider using a native timestamp type for better readability and built-in date/time functions support.
Consider using TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE for created_time and last_modified_time:
created_time TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE,
last_modified_time TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE,This change would provide better date/time manipulation capabilities and timezone awareness.
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacilityRequest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
health-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/web/models/PlanFacilitySearchRequest.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...th-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/rowmapper/PlanFacilityRowMapper.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...th-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/rowmapper/PlanFacilityRowMapper.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...th-services/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/rowmapper/PlanFacilityRowMapper.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...vices/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/querybuilder/PlanFacilityQueryBuilder.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...vices/plan-service/src/main/java/digit/repository/querybuilder/PlanFacilityQueryBuilder.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Database Changes
plan_facility_linkagetable to manage the linkage between plans and facilities.Documentation