Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix the setup master , edit master button rendring logic #1940

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aaradhya-egov
Copy link
Contributor

@aaradhya-egov aaradhya-egov commented Nov 29, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced loading state management for improved user feedback during data loading.
    • Refined success and error pop-up messages for better clarity and communication.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted conditions for displaying loading indicators to ensure users are informed during asynchronous operations.

@aaradhya-egov aaradhya-egov requested a review from a team as a code owner November 29, 2024 06:35
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily focus on the SetupMaster component within SetupMaster.js. The conditional logic for displaying the loading state has been modified to include additional conditions, enhancing the loading indicator's visibility. Furthermore, the handling of success and error pop-ups has been refined, with clearer configurations for different scenarios during the execution of the handleSetupMaster function. Although the overall structure of the component remains unchanged, these adjustments aim to improve user feedback during asynchronous operations.

Changes

File Change Summary
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/sandbox/src/pages/employee/applicationMgmt/SetupMaster.js Modified loading state logic to check for additional conditions. Refined success and error pop-up configurations.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jagankumar-egov

🐇 In the land of code where rabbits play,
Changes are made in a splendid way.
Loaders now show when conditions are right,
Feedback is clearer, a delightful sight!
With pop-ups refined, success in the air,
Hopping along, we code without care! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range comments (3)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/sandbox/src/pages/employee/applicationMgmt/SetupMaster.js (3)

Line range hint 89-106: Enhance error handling in handleSetupMaster

The error handling in the onError callback could be improved:

  1. Console logging isn't helpful for users
  2. The error message shown to users is generic and doesn't include specific error details

Consider this improvement:

 onError: (error, variables) => {
-  console.log(error);
   setShowPopUp({
     key: "error",
     alertHeading: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR",
-    description: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR_DESC",
+    description: error?.message || "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR_DESC",
     subHeading: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR_SUBH",
     heading: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR_HEAD",
     secondaryText: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR_TEXT",
     iconFill: "red",
     customIcon: "",
     buttonLabel: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR_BUTTON_LABEL",
   });
+  Digit.Utils.notificationHandler.error(error?.message || "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR_DESC");
 },

Line range hint 192-236: Remove commented code

There are commented-out code sections that should be removed to maintain code cleanliness:

  • Commented table column configuration
  • Commented icon prop in Button component

Apply this cleanup:

-              // {
-              //   Header: "Type",
-              //   accessor: "type",
-              //   id: "type",
-              // },
               {
                 Header: "Description",
                 accessor: "description",
                 id: "description",
               },

              className="actionButton"
              label={isUserExist ? t("EDIT_MASTER") : t("SETUP_MASTER")}
              variation={"primary"}
-              // icon="ArrowForward"
              isSuffix={true}

Line range hint 19-21: Consider using a reducer for popup state management

The current popup state management using useState could be improved for better maintainability. The popup configurations are repeated in both success and error handlers.

Consider using a reducer to manage popup states:

const popupReducer = (state, action) => {
  switch (action.type) {
    case 'SHOW_SUCCESS':
      return {
        key: "success",
        alertHeading: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_SUCCESS_ALERT",
        description: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_SUCCESS_DESC",
        subHeading: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_SUCCESS_SUBH",
        heading: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_SUCCESS_HEAD",
        secondaryText: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_SUCCESS_TEXT",
        iconFill: "green",
        customIcon: "CheckCircle",
        buttonLabel: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SUCCESS_BUTTON_LABEL",
      };
    case 'SHOW_ERROR':
      return {
        key: "error",
        alertHeading: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR",
        description: action.payload?.message || "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR_DESC",
        subHeading: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR_SUBH",
        heading: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR_HEAD",
        secondaryText: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR_TEXT",
        iconFill: "red",
        customIcon: "",
        buttonLabel: "DEFAULT_MASTER_SETUP_ERROR_BUTTON_LABEL",
      };
    case 'HIDE':
      return null;
    default:
      return state;
  }
};

Then use it in your component:

-const [showPopUp, setShowPopUp] = useState(null);
+const [showPopUp, dispatch] = useReducer(popupReducer, null);

// In error handler:
-setShowPopUp({...})
+dispatch({ type: 'SHOW_ERROR', payload: error })

// In success handler:
-setShowPopUp({...})
+dispatch({ type: 'SHOW_SUCCESS' })

Also applies to: 89-126

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fb39080 and 45c12a8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/sandbox/src/pages/employee/applicationMgmt/SetupMaster.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/sandbox/src/pages/employee/applicationMgmt/SetupMaster.js (1)

Pattern **/*.js: check

🔇 Additional comments (1)
micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/sandbox/src/pages/employee/applicationMgmt/SetupMaster.js (1)

134-136: Verify the necessity of checking isUserExist === null

The loading condition has been expanded to include isUserExist === null. Let's verify if this additional check is necessary:

  1. isUserExist is initialized as null and updated in the useEffect hook when masterCount data is available
  2. The check prevents premature rendering before we know if master data exists
  3. This is a valid addition as it ensures the UI doesn't flicker between states
✅ Verification successful

Loading check for isUserExist === null is correctly implemented

The verification confirms that the loading check is necessary and properly implemented:

  • isUserExist is initialized as null and updated in a useEffect hook when masterCount data becomes available
  • The value is used to determine UI state (edit vs. setup buttons) and configuration through setupMasterConfig
  • The loading check prevents rendering before we know the master data status, avoiding UI flicker and potential errors
  • The implementation follows React best practices for handling async data loading states
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other components that might depend on isUserExist
ast-grep --pattern 'isUserExist = $_'

Length of output: 39


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find usages of isUserExist
rg "isUserExist" -A 3 -B 3

Length of output: 5461


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check where isUserExist is being set
rg "setIsUserExist\(" -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 1460

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant