Update finalised download sheet #1759
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range comments (2)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js (2)
Line range hint
201-229: Refactor navigation handling to use React RouterThe current implementation directly manipulates browser history and dispatches synthetic events. Consider:
- Using React Router's navigation methods instead of direct window.history manipulation
- Consolidating duplicate navigation logic for START and EDIT actions
Example refactor using React Router:
- window.history.pushState( - { - microplanId: row?.id, - campaignId: row?.campaignId, - }, - "", - `/${window.contextPath}/employee/microplan/select-activity?microplanId=${row?.id}&campaignId=${row?.campaignId}` - ); - const navEvent = new PopStateEvent("popstate"); - window.dispatchEvent(navEvent); + const navigate = useNavigate(); + navigate(`/employee/microplan/select-activity`, { + state: { microplanId: row?.id, campaignId: row?.campaignId }, + search: `?microplanId=${row?.id}&campaignId=${row?.campaignId}` + });
Line range hint
201-229: Implement proper error handling for navigation actionsThe action handler should include error handling for failed navigation attempts and invalid parameters.
const onActionSelect = (key, row) => { + try { + if (!row?.id || !row?.campaignId) { + throw new Error('Invalid row data: missing id or campaignId'); + } switch (key) { case "START": // ... navigation logic break; default: console.log(value); break; } + } catch (error) { + console.error('Navigation failed:', error); + // Add error notification here + } };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
🔇 Additional comments (2)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js (2)
79-82: Verify ActionComponent props and error handling
The ActionComponent implementation looks cleaner, but ensure:
- All necessary props are passed to handle actions
- Error boundaries are implemented to handle potential failures
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ActionComponent usage patterns to verify consistent prop passing
ast-grep --pattern 'ActionComponent({ $_ })'Line range hint 201-229: Validate window.contextPath usage
The code uses window.contextPath without validation, which could lead to navigation issues.
| import _ from "lodash"; | ||
| import React, { useState, Fragment } from "react"; | ||
| import { Button as ButtonNew } from "@egovernments/digit-ui-components"; | ||
| import { Dropdown } from "@egovernments/digit-ui-components"; | ||
| import { DeleteIconv2, DownloadIcon, FileIcon, Button, Card, CardSubHeader, EditIcon, ArrowForward } from "@egovernments/digit-ui-react-components"; | ||
| import ActionComponent from "../components/actionComponent"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing ActionComponent implementation
The imported ActionComponent from "../components/actionComponent" is not found in the codebase. The component is referenced in UICustomizations.js but its implementation file appears to be missing. This could lead to runtime errors.
- The component is imported and used in
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/configs/UICustomizations.js - No implementation file exists at the expected relative path
../components/actionComponent - The component is used in a switch case for handling "ACTIONS"
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the ActionComponent implementation
The import statement is correctly placed, but let's verify the component implementation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify ActionComponent exists and check its implementation
fd actionComponent.js$ src/components/ --exec cat {}
Length of output: 190
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the ActionComponent file with different casing and extensions
fd -i actioncomponent src/components/
# Also search for any exports named ActionComponent
ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ ActionComponent'
# And check for any default exports that might be ActionComponent
ast-grep --pattern 'export default $_ ActionComponent'
Length of output: 248
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check the correct path structure
fd -t d micro-ui
# Then search for ActionComponent in all files
rg -l "ActionComponent"
# And get some context around its usage
rg -A 3 -B 3 "ActionComponent"
Length of output: 2176
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ActionComponentfor improved action handling in the user interface.MyMicroplanSearchConfigto streamline navigation based on selected actions.Bug Fixes
row.status.Refactor
additionalCustomizationsmethod for better data preparation and action management.