CSS Changes to summary #1742
CSS Changes to summary #1742
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@abishekTa-egov has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 31 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to multiple files primarily focused on modifying CSS class names and updating stylesheet links for health-related UI components. The stylesheet link in both Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range comments (10)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/HeaderComp.js (3)
Line range hint
12-14: Fix className inconsistency and style prop formatting.
- The className "header-style" should be updated to "mp-header-style" to maintain consistency with other components as mentioned in the summary.
- The styles prop needs proper spacing.
- <Header className="header-style"styles={mergedStyles}> + <Header className="mp-header-style" styles={mergedStyles}>
Line range hint
11-15: Remove unnecessary whitespace.There's excessive whitespace around the Header component that should be cleaned up.
return ( - - <Header className="mp-header-style" styles={mergedStyles}> - {t(title)} - </Header> - + <Header className="mp-header-style" styles={mergedStyles}> + {t(title)} + </Header> );
Line range hint
8-9: Consider adding JSDoc comments for better documentation.Adding JSDoc comments would improve component documentation by clearly describing the props and their purposes.
+/** + * HeaderComp - A reusable header component with customizable styles + * @param {string} title - The title text to be displayed (will be translated) + * @param {Object} styles - Custom styles to be applied to the header (default: {marginBottom: "0rem"}) + * @returns {JSX.Element} Header component + */ const HeaderComp = ({ title, styles = { marginBottom: "0rem" } }) => {health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/subBoundaryView.js (1)
Line range hint
6-91: Consider adding error boundaries for robust error handling.While the component structure is well-organized, adding error boundaries would improve the robustness of the component, especially when handling potential rendering errors in the chips section.
Consider wrapping the component content with an error boundary:
import { ErrorBoundary } from '@egovernments/digit-ui-components'; const SubBoundaryView = ({ title, arr, style, editHandler, isEditable }) => { // ... existing state and handlers ... return ( <ErrorBoundary> <div> {/* ... existing component content ... */} </div> </ErrorBoundary> ); };health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/DataMgmtComponent.js (2)
Line range hint
44-47: Consider refactoring URL parameter handling.The URL parameter manipulation logic is duplicated in both edit button handlers. Consider extracting this into a reusable function to improve maintainability.
+const handleEdit = (key) => { + const urlParams = Digit.Hooks.useQueryParams(); + urlParams.key = key; + const updatedUrl = `${window.location.pathname}?${new URLSearchParams(urlParams).toString()}`; + history.push(updatedUrl); +}; -onClick={(e) => { - const url = Digit.Hooks.useQueryParams(); - const urlParams = Digit.Hooks.useQueryParams(); - urlParams.key = '4'; - const updatedUrl = `${window.location.pathname}?${new URLSearchParams(urlParams).toString()}`; - history.push(updatedUrl); -}} +onClick={() => handleEdit('4')} // Similarly update the second onClick handler to use handleEdit('5')Also applies to: 91-94
Line range hint
44-47: Remove unused variable declarations.The
urlvariable is declared but never used in both edit button handlers.onClick={(e) => { - const url = Digit.Hooks.useQueryParams(); const urlParams = Digit.Hooks.useQueryParams(); urlParams.key = '4'; const updatedUrl = `${window.location.pathname}?${new URLSearchParams(urlParams).toString()}`; history.push(updatedUrl); }}Also applies to: 53-56
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/components/microplan.scss (2)
Line range hint
127-165: Consider using responsive units for better mobile support.The table-like layout is well structured, but the fixed width units (
20rem) might cause layout issues on mobile devices. Consider using relative units or media queries for better responsiveness..as-key-cell { font-weight: bold; - min-width: 20rem; + min-width: 30%; background-color: #fff; overflow: hidden; text-overflow: ellipsis; white-space: nowrap; } + @media screen and (max-width: 768px) { + .as-key-cell { + min-width: 40%; + } + .as-value-cell { + width: 60%; + } + }
Line range hint
199-241: Optimize SCSS using nesting for better maintainability.The pagination controls are well-structured, but the CSS could be more maintainable using SCSS nesting capabilities.
.pagination-controls { display: flex; justify-content: space-between; align-items: center; padding: 1rem; border-top: 1px solid #ccc; margin-top: 1rem; font-size: 0.9rem; + label { + display: flex; + align-items: center; + gap: 0.5rem; + } + select { + padding: 0.3rem; + font-size: 0.9rem; + border-radius: 4px; + border: 1px solid #ccc; + } + div { + display: flex; + align-items: center; + gap: 0.5rem; + } + button { + background: none; + border: none; + color: #007bff; + cursor: pointer; + font-size: 0.9rem; + &:disabled { + color: #ccc; + } + &:hover:not(:disabled) { + text-decoration: underline; + } + } }health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js (2)
Line range hint
188-190: Simplify the edit button visibility condition.The current condition
!(setupCompleted === 'true')could be simplified for better readability and type safety.Consider this improvement:
- {!(setupCompleted === 'true') && + {setupCompleted !== 'true' &&Or better yet, if
setupCompletedis meant to be a boolean:- {!(setupCompleted === 'true') && + {!setupCompleted &&
Line range hint
191-201: Fix duplicate hook calls in onClick handler.The code calls
Digit.Hooks.useQueryParams()twice unnecessarily, which violates React hooks best practices and could lead to unnecessary re-renders.Apply this fix:
onClick={(e) => { - const url = Digit.Hooks.useQueryParams(); const urlParams = Digit.Hooks.useQueryParams(); urlParams.key = '9'; urlParams.internalKey = internalKey + 1; const updatedUrl = `${window.location.pathname}?${new URLSearchParams(urlParams).toString()}`; history.push(updatedUrl); }}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/package.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/public/index.html(1 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/components/microplan.scss(1 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/AssumptionsList.js(1 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/DataMgmtComponent.js(2 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/FormulaConfigScreen.js(1 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/FormulaView.js(0 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/HeaderComp.js(1 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js(1 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/subBoundaryView.js(1 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js(1 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/public/index.html(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/FormulaView.js
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (7)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/AssumptionsList.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/DataMgmtComponent.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/FormulaConfigScreen.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/HeaderComp.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/subBoundaryView.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
📓 Learnings (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js (1)
Learnt from: Ramkrishna-egov
PR: egovernments/DIGIT-Frontend#1670
File: health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js:156-160
Timestamp: 2024-10-25T09:24:29.878Z
Learning: In the `UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper` component, since the `ShowMoreWrapper` is rendered within the cell, additional checks or row-specific state management are not required.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/HeaderComp.js (1)
Line range hint 1-18: Verify the impact of style changes across components.
The change in default styles and class names might affect the layout in other components using this header.
Let's verify the usage of this component and potential style conflicts:
✅ Verification successful
Style changes in HeaderComp are safe and consistent with existing usage
The verification shows that:
- The default style
marginBottom: "0rem"aligns with existing usage patterns across the codebase - All components using HeaderComp already pass custom styles through the
stylesprop, primarily for color and margin adjustments - The
header-styleclass is only used within the HeaderComp component itself and doesn't conflict with other components - The style changes maintain backward compatibility as they preserve the existing styling behavior while allowing component-specific customization
The changes are well-contained and follow the established pattern of style customization in the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for HeaderComp usage across the codebase
echo "Checking HeaderComp usage patterns:"
rg -l "HeaderComp" --type js
# Search for potentially conflicting class names
echo "\nChecking for potential class name conflicts:"
rg -l "header-style" --type scss --type css
Length of output: 1387
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage of HeaderComp in the files to understand style patterns
echo "Checking HeaderComp usage in files:"
rg "HeaderComp" -A 3 -B 1 --type js
# Let's also check for any CSS/SCSS files in the microplan module
echo "\nChecking for style files in microplan module:"
fd -e css -e scss . health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/
# Let's check the Header component from digit-ui-react-components to understand default styling
echo "\nChecking Header component usage from digit-ui-react-components:"
rg "Header.*style" --type js health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/
Length of output: 20835
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/public/index.html (2)
19-19: Ensure version consistency across the application.
Since this is part of a health micro-UI, verify that all related components are using compatible versions.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for version consistency across health-related components
# Test: Look for other health-related package versions in HTML files
rg -l "digit-ui-health" | xargs rg "@[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"19-19: Verify the availability and compatibility of the new CSS version.
The CSS version update from 0.1.18 to 0.1.19 needs verification to ensure the new version exists and maintains compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Version update is consistent and properly synchronized
The verification confirms:
- The package.json correctly defines version 0.1.19
- Both the example and main public/index.html files use the same version (0.1.19)
- The version update is properly reflected across the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and content of the new CSS version
# Test 1: Check if the new version exists and is accessible
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}" https://unpkg.com/@egovernments/[email protected]/dist/index.css
# Test 2: Compare package versions in package.json files
fd package.json --exec grep -l "digit-ui-health-css"
Length of output: 1810
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the version consistency across the codebase and check package.json content
cat health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/package.json
# Also check if both example and main public/index.html files are in sync
diff health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/public/index.html health/micro-ui/web/public/index.html
Length of output: 3276
health/micro-ui/web/public/index.html (1)
13-13: Verify consistent CSS version updates across files.
The AI summary mentions similar updates in health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/public/index.html. Let's verify this for consistency.
✅ Verification successful
CSS version is consistent across both index.html files
Both files are using the same version @0.1.19 of the @egovernments/digit-ui-health-css package:
health/micro-ui/web/public/index.htmlhealth/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/public/index.html
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if both index.html files have been updated to the same CSS version
# Test: Search for health CSS version references in both files
echo "Checking CSS versions in index.html files:"
rg --type html "digit-ui-health-css@"
Length of output: 453
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/subBoundaryView.js (1)
22-22: LGTM! Good namespace improvement.
The class name change from 'header-container' to 'mp-header-container' is a good practice as it helps prevent CSS class name collisions by namespacing the styles specific to the microplan module.
Let's verify the CSS updates:
✅ Verification successful
CSS class name change is properly implemented
The verification shows that:
- The new
mp-header-containerclass exists in the correct stylesheet athealth/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/components/microplan.scss - The class name change is consistently applied across multiple microplan module components
- The old
header-containerclass is still used in other modules (campaign-manager, workbench-hcm) but with their own namespaces (e.g.,wbh-header-container), which follows the same pattern of module-specific prefixing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the CSS class has been properly updated in stylesheet files
# and ensure no old class names remain
# Search for any remaining usage of the old class name
echo "Checking for any remaining usage of old class name 'header-container':"
rg -l 'header-container' --type css --type scss
# Search for the new class name to confirm it exists in stylesheets
echo "Verifying new class name 'mp-header-container' exists in stylesheets:"
rg -l 'mp-header-container' --type css --type scss
Length of output: 468
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find CSS/SCSS files and their content
# First, find all potential stylesheet files
echo "Finding all CSS/SCSS files:"
fd "\.(css|scss)$"
# Then search for both class names in all files (not just CSS/SCSS)
# to catch any inline styles or styled-components
echo -e "\nChecking for old class name 'header-container':"
rg "header-container"
echo -e "\nChecking for new class name 'mp-header-container':"
rg "mp-header-container"
# Also check for any styled-components usage
echo -e "\nChecking for styled-components usage:"
rg "styled\." -A 2
Length of output: 16830
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/DataMgmtComponent.js (1)
71-71: LGTM! Consistent class naming.
The class name change here maintains consistency with the previous instance, ensuring uniform styling across both Population and Facilities sections.
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js (1)
Line range hint 1-248: Verify stylesheet version compatibility.
The AI summary mentions a stylesheet version update from 0.1.18 to 0.1.19. Ensure that the inline styles in this component are compatible with any global style changes introduced in the new version.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the specific style changes between versions 0.1.18 and 0.1.19.
Let me check the actual content of the CSS file to understand the style definitions.
Based on the analysis of the CSS files and changes between versions, I can now provide the final response:
No stylesheet compatibility issues found.
The inline styles used in the SummaryScreen component are fully compatible with both versions of the stylesheet (0.1.18 and 0.1.19). The component uses standard inline style properties for margins, padding, and colors that are not affected by the stylesheet version change. The .campaign-preview-edit-container class used in the component maintains the same styling definitions across versions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any style-related changes in package.json or other config files
rg -g "package.json" -g "*.html" "0.1.1[89]"
Length of output: 453
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any inline style related changes in the component
rg -g "*.css" -g "*.scss" "\.campaign-preview-edit-container|DATA_VALIDATION_RULE" health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/
# Check git history for CSS changes between versions
git log --oneline -p health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/ | rg "0\.1\.1[89]|campaign-preview|DATA_VALIDATION_RULE"
Length of output: 618
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the content of the CSS file containing campaign-preview styles
cat health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/index.scss
# Check if there are any breaking changes in the stylesheet between versions
git diff $(git rev-list -n 1 --before="2024-01-01" HEAD) HEAD -- health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/index.scss
Length of output: 43131
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/UserAccessMgmtTableWrapper.js (1)
186-186: LGTM: CSS class name change follows consistent naming pattern.
The change from 'header-container' to 'mp-header-container' follows a good practice of namespacing CSS classes to prevent style conflicts.
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/HeaderComp.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/example/public/index.html
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/AssumptionsList.js
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...o-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/FormulaConfigScreen.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ const FormulaConfigScreen = ({ customProps, setupCompleted }) => { | |||
| {Object.keys(dictionary).length > 0 && ( | |||
| Object.keys(dictionary).map((category, ind) => ( | |||
| <Fragment key={category}> | |||
| <div className="header-container"> | |||
| <HeaderComp title={t(String(category))} /> | |||
| <div className="mp-header-container"> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Update the remaining .header-container class in campaignCycle.scss
The class name change from header-container to mp-header-container is incomplete. While the new class exists in microplan.scss, the old class name is still being used in:
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/pages/employee/campaignCycle.scss
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify consistent class name updates across stylesheets.
The class name change from header-container to mp-header-container looks good as it helps prevent CSS naming conflicts. Let's verify that the corresponding stylesheet has been updated.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the old class name still exists in any stylesheets and verify the new class exists
# Expected: No occurrences of the old class name, at least one occurrence of the new class name
echo "Checking for old class name..."
rg -g "*.{css,scss}" "\.header-container"
echo "Verifying new class name exists..."
rg -g "*.{css,scss}" "\.mp-header-container"
Length of output: 459
| @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ export const DataMgmtComponent = ({ customProps, setupCompleted }) => { | |||
| return ( | |||
| <> | |||
| <Card style={{ marginBottom: "1rem" }}> | |||
| <div className="header-container"> | |||
| <div className="mp-header-container"> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
CSS class name change requires broader updates
The class name change from "header-container" to "mp-header-container" is part of a larger pattern that needs to be consistently applied. The search results show:
- The new "mp-header-container" class is already being used in multiple microplan module files
- However, "header-container" is still present in several files across different modules (workbench-hcm, campaign-manager, hcm-microplanning)
- The CSS is defined in
packages/css/src/components/microplan.scss
To maintain consistency:
- Update remaining instances in microplan module files
- Consider similar namespace prefixing for other modules using this class
- Ensure CSS selectors in microplan.scss are updated to match
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify CSS cascade impact.
The class name change from "header-container" to "mp-header-container" follows good practice by adding a module-specific prefix. This helps prevent CSS naming collisions.
Let's verify if there are any remaining instances of the old class name that might need updating:
Let me also check for the new class name to understand its usage:
And let's check the specific file content to understand the context better:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of the old class name
rg "header-container" --type js --type jsx
Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of the old class name, using ripgrep without file type restrictions
rg "header-container" -l
Length of output: 1324
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the new class name pattern
rg "mp-header-container" -l
Length of output: 626
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# View the component file content
cat "health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/DataMgmtComponent.js"
Length of output: 5143
| .mp-header-container { | ||
| display: flex; | ||
| justify-content: space-between; | ||
| align-items: center; | ||
| margin-bottom: 1rem; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider adding vertical spacing.
The class renaming and flex layout properties look good. However, consider adding some vertical spacing (margin-bottom) to maintain consistent layout rhythm with the content below.
.mp-header-container {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: center;
+ margin-bottom: 1rem;
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| .mp-header-container { | |
| display: flex; | |
| justify-content: space-between; | |
| align-items: center; | |
| margin-bottom: 1rem; | |
| } | |
| .mp-header-container { | |
| display: flex; | |
| justify-content: space-between; | |
| align-items: center; | |
| margin-bottom: 1rem; | |
| } |
| @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ const SummaryScreen = ({ props: customProps }) => { | |||
| sections: [ | |||
| { | |||
| type: "DATA", | |||
| cardHeader: { value: t("CAMPAIGN_DETAILS"), inlineStyles: { marginTop: 0, marginBottom: "0.5rem", fontSize: "1.5rem" } }, | |||
| cardHeader: { value: t("CAMPAIGN_DETAILS"), inlineStyles: { marginTop: 0, marginBottom: "1rem", fontSize: "1.5rem" } }, | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider moving inline styles to a CSS module or styled-components.
While the margin adjustment is valid, having inline styles scattered throughout the component makes it harder to maintain consistent styling across the application. This is especially important for header styles that should be consistent across different sections.
Consider extracting these styles to a dedicated CSS module or using styled-components:
// styles.module.css
.cardHeader {
margin-top: 0;
margin-bottom: 1rem;
font-size: 1.5rem;
}
// Component
cardHeader: { value: t("CAMPAIGN_DETAILS"), className: styles.cardHeader }
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/Response.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/Response.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
| <Button | ||
| style={{ margin: "0.5rem", marginLeft: "6rem" }} | ||
| className="microplan-response-button" | ||
| variation="secondary" | ||
| label={t(back)} | ||
| icon={"ArrowBack"} | ||
| onClick={() => { | ||
| const backlink = state?.backlink || `/${window.contextPath}/employee/`; | ||
| history.push(backlink); | ||
| }} | ||
| /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Move inline styles to CSS file for better maintainability.
The Button implementation looks good, but the inline styles should be moved to CSS for better maintainability and consistency.
Consider moving the inline styles to your CSS file:
-<Button
- style={{ margin: "0.5rem", marginLeft: "6rem" }}
- className="microplan-response-button"
+<Button
+ className="microplan-response-button back-button"Then in your CSS:
.back-button {
margin: 0.5rem;
margin-left: 6rem;
}| const backlink = state?.backlink || `/${window.contextPath}/employee/`; | ||
| history.push(backlink); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider using path.join for backlink construction.
The backlink path construction could be made more robust by using proper path joining.
Consider this improvement:
-const backlink = state?.backlink || `/${window.contextPath}/employee/`;
+const defaultPath = [window.contextPath, 'employee'].join('/');
+const backlink = state?.backlink || `/${defaultPath}`;This approach:
- Prevents double slashes
- Makes path construction more maintainable
- Is less error-prone
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const backlink = state?.backlink || `/${window.contextPath}/employee/`; | |
| history.push(backlink); | |
| const defaultPath = [window.contextPath, 'employee'].join('/'); | |
| const backlink = state?.backlink || `/${defaultPath}`; | |
| history.push(backlink); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/FormulaConfigScreen.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/FormulaConfigScreen.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
| <div className="mp-header-container"> | ||
| <HeaderComp title={t(String(category))} styles={{marginBottom:"1rem"}} /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Class name inconsistency found in CampaignBoundary.js
The class name update from 'header-container' to 'mp-header-container' is not consistent across the microplan module. Found one file still using the old class name:
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/CampaignBoundary.jsstill usesheader-containerinstead ofmp-header-container
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Class name update and margin styling look good.
The changes align with the PR objectives:
- Class name updated to prevent CSS naming conflicts
- Margin styling properly implemented with correct spelling
Let's verify the class name update is consistent across the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify class name updates across the codebase
# Expected: No occurrences of old class name in microplan-related files
# Check for any remaining instances of the old class name in microplan-related files
echo "Checking for old class name in microplan files..."
rg -g "microplan/**" "header-container"
# Verify the new class name exists in stylesheet
echo "Verifying new class name in stylesheets..."
rg -g "*.{css,scss}" "\.mp-header-container"
Length of output: 544
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more accurate search pattern for microplan files
echo "Checking for old class name in microplan files..."
rg -g "**/{microplan,Microplan}/**" "header-container"
# Let's also check the actual implementation of mp-header-container in the stylesheet
echo "Checking mp-header-container implementation..."
rg -A 5 "\.mp-header-container" health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/css/src/components/microplan.scss
Length of output: 1575
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range comments (1)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js (1)
Line range hint
134-197: Critical: Duplicate FormulaConfigScreen components detected.The component contains two identical cards (card5 and card8) that both render the FormulaConfigScreen component with the same props. This duplication could lead to:
- Confusion in navigation
- Potential state management issues
- Unnecessary re-renders
Consider removing one of the duplicate cards. If they serve different purposes, consider:
- Renaming them to reflect their distinct purposes
- Adding comments to explain the difference
- Using different components if they truly serve different purposes
- { - navigationKey: "card8", - noCardStyle: true, - sections: [ - { - type: "COMPONENT", - noCardStyle: true, - component: "FormulaConfigScreen", - props: { - customProps: customProps, - setupCompleted: setupCompleted - }, - }, - ], - },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/FormulaConfigScreen.js(2 hunks)health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/FormulaConfigScreen.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js (1)
Pattern **/*.js: check
🔇 Additional comments (4)
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/components/FormulaConfigScreen.js (2)
42-42: LGTM! Card wrapper improves visual structure.
The replacement of Fragment with Card component and consistent margin spacing enhances the visual hierarchy of the sections.
Also applies to: 71-71
43-44: LGTM! Header styling changes look good.
The header container styling has been properly updated with:
- Namespace-prefixed class name to prevent CSS conflicts
- Correct margin spacing for better visual hierarchy
health/micro-ui/web/micro-ui-internals/packages/modules/microplan/src/pages/employee/SummaryScreen.js (2)
33-33: Skip comment as there's an existing review.
135-135: LGTM! The noCardStyle property is consistent with other cards.
The addition of noCardStyle: true follows the established pattern used in other card configurations.
CSS Changes to summary
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Style
.header-containerclass to.mp-header-containeracross multiple components for consistent styling.Bug Fixes